Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Joe Schmidt’s ‘frustration’ as Wallabies fall short in another loss to Boks

Joe Schmidt, coach of the Wallabies looks on before the team photo during a Wallabies captain's run at Optus Stadium on August 16, 2024 in Perth, Australia. (Photo by Paul Kane/Getty Images)

Two days out from the Wallabies Test against the Springboks in Perth, halfback Nic White described the visitors as “the benchmark.” South Africa are the current men’s world champions and they’d taken their game to another level against Australia the weekend before.

ADVERTISEMENT

Kurt-Lee Arendse was almost untouchable as the winger with fast feet crossed for a decisive double at Suncorp Stadium on August 10. Those tries went a long way to helping the Boks claim their first win at the Brisbane venue in more than a decade.

Coach Rassie Erasmus made headlines a few days after that dominant 33-7 victory by naming a new-look side to take on the same foe at Optus Stadium. While the team boasted World Cup-winning talent, 10 changes to a First XV is always going to make headlines.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

While some fans and media outlets branded that Springboks outfit as the ‘B team’ going into the second Test, it didn’t seem to change either team’s approach. This was still international rugby after all, and both sides were desperate to get the job done on Saturday.

But when the full-time whistle sounded, Australia had lost again. Only six points separated the teams with 34 minutes to play but the Boks ended up running away with a 30-12 win. It was a result that left coach Joe Schmidt feeling a bit frustrated later that night.

“It’s a little bit of confidence and a little bit of frustration because when we got to 18-12, and it stayed like that for just a little while, we had a couple of half-opportunities to potentially build pressure or capitalise on opportunity that we didn’t take,” Joe Schmidt told reporters.

“If you don’t get those and you don’t grab those and you don’t create a little bit of doubt in their mind that we’re close enough and dangerous enough, then that a little bit of frustration.

ADVERTISEMENT

“But as I said, first half, I felt we fought really, really hard. We end up with a few good line breaks and a few opportunities… when Max (Jorgensen) did his (line break), there was that little bit of space behind there to look for if he could’ve found it.

“For us, it would’ve put us potentially back to 23-19 and then you’re right in the game again. We got so much good support today that I’m sure people would have been really excited about and obviously so would we.”

Points Flow Chart

South Africa win +18
Time in lead
13
Mins in lead
65
16%
% Of Game In Lead
81%
42%
Possession Last 10 min
58%
0
Points Last 10 min
7

Flyhalf Noah Lolesio kicked a penalty goal in the 46t minute to cut the Springboks’ lead down to an 18-12 margin. But two quick tries to replacement hooker Malcolm Marx took away any hopes of what would’ve been a surprising Wallabies win.

That leaves Australia at the bottom of The Rugby Championship standings after two rounds. They’re the only team yet to claim a victory in this year’s competition, with Argentina and New Zealand splitting their series in Aotearoa with one win each.

ADVERTISEMENT

While the Wallabies showed signs of improvement – with Angus Bell impressing in the first half, and so did Noah Lolesio in the No. 10 jumper – “it’s not going to get any easier.” All four teams have a week off but Australia will have one eye on their Tests in Argentina.

The Wallabies will take on Los Pumas in two Tests, while the Springboks host the All Blacks. Argentina will be riding a wave of confidence after stunning New Zealand in Wellington recently, and they’ll be eager to return to winning ways after losing at Eden Park.

“Firstly, they are a great bunch of men and they are incredibly proud to play for their country and incredibly disappointed not to be successful when they are playing for their country,” Schmidt explained.

“One of the things about this competition is it’s not going to get any easier. We play three of the four semi-finalists (from last year’s Rugby World Cup) and we weren’t one of them so it doesn’t get easier going to Argentina next.

“They’ll be disappointed with their first-half earlier tonight but that demonstrated just how tough they can be to beat when they toppled the All Blacks and didn’t even give them a bonus point.

“I’ve known (Argentina coach) Felipe Contepomi for a long time, I have a lot of respect for his rugby intellect and he’s a top man. Being friends certainly stops at kick-off, though, so they won’t be taking it easy on us and we’ll try to make things difficult for them.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

11 Comments
F
FC 125 days ago

Fall short?

Try, "Humiliated by a below par Springbok B team"

M
MO 125 days ago

It’s going to take time for Joe to put his imprint on this team - after Eddie Jones debacle

M
Michael86 125 days ago

No one told him to go coach that team.

O
OJohn 125 days ago

He's just greedy for more money for his retirement to look after his family, with any easy job with no requirement to perform, by always saying he's building and he should be employed for the long term.

We have seen this bs from kiwi coaches every time. It's designed to keep Australia down.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 11 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

147 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

147 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search