Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Johann van Graan: Tigers have become Pumas in the way they play

BATH, ENGLAND - SEPTEMBER 20: Johann van Graan, Bath Head of Rugby, looks on prior to the Gallagher Premiership Rugby match between Bath Rugby and Northampton Saints at Recreation Ground on September 20, 2024 in Bath, England. (Photo by Patrick Khachfe/Getty Images)

Being very much his own man, Michael Cheika was never going to take much time in stamping his own mark on Leicester Tigers.

ADVERTISEMENT

Cheika’s infectious personality and motivational skills were evident in last weekend’s backs-against-the-wall 17-14 victory at Exeter, which was full of character.

It was the type of game that Leicester would arguably have lost under fellow Aussie Dan McKellar last season.

Video Spacer

Los Pumas backline coach Kenny Lynn talks about Tony Brown

Video Spacer

Los Pumas backline coach Kenny Lynn talks about Tony Brown

But Cheika’s opposing coach this weekend, Bath boss Johann van Graan, has spotted a tactical change as well as an emotional uplift.

The South African believes Cheika has augmented their traditional strengths by introducing a key element from his time with Argentina’s Pumas into the Leicester playbook.

“I don’t think the Tigers will change too much, I think they’ll stick with their DNA: a good scrum, a good maul and a very good defensive game – chop tackles and good on the floor,” van Graan said.

“One thing that they have definitely added to their game, if you look at how Argentina play, is that they are playing off 10 a bit more and they are kicking off 10 a bit more, which asks different questions. So we’ve got to adapt to that.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

Van Graan added: “I have a lot of respect for Michael and the Tigers. They’ve traditionally been one of the powerhouses of not only English rugby but European rugby, and I think looking from the outside, last season they were pretty close in the end. They have got some very good players.”

Bath have only made three changes to the team that started last Friday’s 38-16 win over champions Northampton – all in the pack, whereas for last season’s mid-winter trip to Welford Road they made a dozen and lost 35-22.

It was the only time last season in 18 rounds of regular rugby that Bath failed to take anything from the game.

Leicester also won at The Rec, after Jamie Shillcock held his nerve to kick the match-winning penalty, and van Graan is expecting a monumental battle with the Tigers.

ADVERTISEMENT

“You can speak about their results but they were not as far off as people might think.

“Michael has been around the block quite a few times with a few teams so he will certainly give them belief.

“But we can’t control that, we are running our own race, and that has been a real success story for us because we are just focusing on ourselves; we’re never too high, never too low.

“In short, we are coming up against very good opponents who got a very good win away at Exeter. They did in the last minute of the game and that takes some doing.

Kicks

14
Total Kicks
22
1:14
Kick To Pass Ratio
1:4.9

“It’ll be two teams that will what to impose their game on the opposition. What more can you ask for on a Sunday afternoon?

“Bath-Leicester, if you look at the history of it, it is generally one of the biggest games of the calendar.

“The last time we went up there we obviously didn’t win the game; we took some learnings out of that and we are positive about the weekend.”

Ross Molony comes into the second row to make his Bath debut, while openside Guy Pepper is handed his first start and is joined in a rejigged back row by Josh Bayliss, at six.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search