Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Jonathan Davies' verdict on Warren Gatland's six wins from 22 run

Wales boss Warren Gatland looks on prior to the Autumn Nations Series loss to Fiji (Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

Legendary Wales out-half Jonathan Davies has given his verdict on Warren Gatland’s rotten run in his second stint as national team head coach. The Kiwi enjoyed enormous success during his initial period in charge, winning four Six Nations titles (three were Grand Slams) and guiding them to Rugby World Cup semi-finals in 2011 and 2019.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, Gatland’s second coming as Wales boss has been terrible as just six wins in 22 matches have been recorded and they are currently on a record-equalling run of 10 straight losses with Australia preparing to visit Cardiff next Sunday.

Wales were humbled 19-24 last Sunday at Principality Stadium, leaving them ranked 11th in the world and igniting calls for Gatland to be sacked. Mike Phillips and Jamie Roberts are just two former Gatland players critical of the current lack of success, and Davies has now joined the debate.

Writing in his latest walesonline.co.uk column, the retired dual code star said criticism of Gatland was valid. “You have got to take the rough with the smooth. He has taken all the glory of Grand Slams and Six Nations titles, but when you are on a run like this, the buck stops with the coach. He understands that.

“He seems to have the backing of everybody. He made that clear after the Italy game in this year’s Six Nations. He was clever enough to offer his resignation after the game and they said no.

22m Entries

Avg. Points Scored
2.1
9
Entries
Avg. Points Scored
2.3
9
Entries

“But the pressure is building and it all depends on these next two games. Then you probably have a decision to make for the Six Nations, either before it or after it. I don’t think you can sack him now, but it’s not looking good with the way they are.

“You have got the best team in the world [South Africa] coming over and a rejuvenated Australian side. It’s down to the Welsh Rugby Union, really. They are the ones that brought him back and gave him a big contract.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Davies went on to analyse the Wales performance versus Fiji before returning to the topic of whether Gatland is the best coach to take the team forward. “Whatever happens in the rest of the autumn, Gatland will surely be thinking about if he can take Wales forward anymore?

“He talks a good game, speaking about the positives afterwards. But it’s hard to take the positives when you have just lost control of the match against Fiji. It’s a pressure pot and the pressure is certainly building.

“It’s all down to getting that elusive result. That is only going to get more elusive, purely because of the teams you are playing against. Joe Schmidt looks like he knows what he is doing. He has won five out of 10 with the Wallabies. For context, Gatland has won six out of 22… Frankly, they are in a very, very tough place.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search