Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Jones puts pressure on Saturday's referee Pascal Gauzere after England's stuttering Italian job with the Frenchman in charge

(Photo by Chris Ricco/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

Eddie Jones is never shy of stirring the pot ahead of an England international and aside from describing the Ireland side that is coming to Twickenham as a United Nations XV, he has also put some heat on Saturday’s Autumn Nations Cup referee Pascal Gauzere. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The Frenchman was an assistant referee last week in Dublin when Ireland got their campaign off to a winning start against Wales. He now takes over the whistle from Mathieu Raynal, who will be an assistant along with Alexandre Ruiz in London. 

Ireland enjoyed dominance at the breakdown and in the scrum against the Welsh, winning a number of penalties, but Jones has moved to plant a seed in the French official’s mind by mentioning the need for the referee to be strong when adjudicating those two key areas where the Irish excelled last Friday.   

Video Spacer

England’s Tom Curry looks ahead to the breakdown battle versus Ireland

Video Spacer

England’s Tom Curry looks ahead to the breakdown battle versus Ireland

“The scrum contest is always challenging against Ireland,” said Jones, whose team have so far clinched the Six Nations title with a win over Italy and beaten Georgia in round one of the Nations Cup since they resumed playing.

“We have got a referee on the weekend who generally doesn’t reward the dominant scrum so it will be interesting to see how he looks at that area. We’ll need to be adaptable to his calls on it. 

Gauzere was in charge of that October 31 win over the Italians in Rome but it wasn’t all plain sailing for England as the penalty count was 13-all and it wasn’t until the closing stages that they pulled away on the scoreboard. England managed to win three scrum penalties off Italy but they were penalised on five occasions at the ruck, twice at the lineout, twice more at the maul, with the rest being on-the-ground infringements. A dozen of those penalties were against forwards.

Gauzere’s previous England appointment prior to Rome was the narrow February win over Scotland. “There is no use scrummaging if you can’t get a result out of it. But they [Ireland] have got a good scrum. (Cian) Healy has played 100 caps at loosehead so he has got to be hugely respected,” he continued before giving his opinion on Ireland tighthead Andrew Porter.

ADVERTISEMENT

“He has done really well. He has taken to Test rugby well, scrums in a fairly unusual way which may need some referee intervention so we’ll wait and see. I’ll leave that up to the referee.” 

Jones also made mention of the French ref when teeing up the battle of the back rows, England’s Tom Curry, Sam Underhill and Billy Vunipola up against Ireland’s CJ Stander, Peter O’Mahony and Caelan Doris. “They [Ireland] are the best poaching team in Europe, the highest poaching team in Europe. Guys like CJ Stander and Peter O’Mahony, they are both really good at the contest. We have got a referee that favours the contest, so that is going to be a real battle. 

“It’s a different Irish side. We are not sure what they are going to bring to the table. They have picked a heavy back row. Normally they pick more of a fetcher in there so that may allude to how they are going to play. We’ll just have to wait and see.”

https://twitter.com/RugbyPass/status/1329745448534413312

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 20 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

149 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

149 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’ under Razor Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’
Search