Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Jones: The world domination reasons why he decided to stick with England

Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

Eddie Jones has claimed England’s recent Six Nations form has restored his belief that he can make his team the best the world has ever seen.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Australian has the highest win ratio – 78 per cent – in the history of England coaches, winning 42, drawing one and losing just eleven of his 54 outings in charge since succeeding Stuart Lancaster following the 2015 World Cup.

(Continue reading below…)

Big Jim and Goodey catch up with Darren Childs on The Rugby Pod to discuss the likelihood of the Gallagher Premiership season being resumed

Video Spacer

Two of those defeats were of recent vintage, the World Cup final loss last November to South Africa in Yokohama and the Six Nations opener away to France.

However, what he saw in the weeks following the February 2 defeat in Paris – wins over Scotland, Ireland and Wales to secure the Triple Crown – convinced him he has what it takes to make England better than any side has ever been. 

“That is what we want to achieve,” he said during a conference call from Japan after the RFU confirmed Jones has extended his contract and will coach England though to the 2023 World Cup in France. 

“It’s an aspirational goal because you don’t play one game and you are the greatest team. But we want to aspire to be a team that everyone remembers. We have played some good rugby over the last four years and can play even better rugby in the next three years. That is the challenge ahead.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Having done the four years I felt the project hasn’t been finished yet. There is still a lot of growth in the team and the last Six Nations, as I discussed previously, I wanted to make sure that I could still have an effect on the team, still improve the team.

“I think I can do that and therefore it is a good fit for me to continue because we have got a lot of growth left. We are still a relatively young side and I can still add to the growth of the team.

“At the end of the World Cup, you have got to make an assessment of whether you can continue to develop the team and whether as a coach you can be effective. 

“Therefore the Six Nations for me was quite important. I wanted to make sure if I was going to continue I could have an effect on the team and I believe I can. That is the reason I have decided to continue and accepted the kind offer from the RFU.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Jones remains in the dark as to when England’s next match will be, RFU CEO Bill Sweeney suggesting it won’t be until the end of April when a final decision is taken on whether the July tour to Japan can go ahead due to the coronavirus pandemic that led to the postponement of England’s last outing, the March 14 Six Nations trip to Italy.

Jones sounded like he was taking the scheduling uncertainty in his stride. “It comes back to the fact that it’s about controlling what you can control. Our problems are quite insignificant compared to the problems around the world so we have got to keep things in perspective.

“When we get the opportunity to play we want to play with passion, we want to play with pride and we want to give people something to enjoy and that has got to be our target. In the meantime, we have just got to play our roles in being good citizens and help support as much as we can.”

WATCH: Billy Vunipola chats to Jim Hamilton in the latest episode of The Lockdown, the new RugbyPass series

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 26 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

149 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

149 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search