Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Jonny May banned after 'highly reckless' tackle on Ollie Lawrence

(Photo by Patrick Khachfe/Getty Images)

Jonny May, the Gloucester winger who recently announced his Test rugby retirement, has copped a three-game ban after getting cited for dangerous play during his club’s Gallagher Premiership defeat last Friday at home to Bath.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Steve Borthwick Rugby World Cup selection favourite made head contact with England colleague Ollie Lawrence during the early part of his club’s 45-27 loss at Kingsholm.

A disciplinary hearing was held on Tuesday and the verdict emerged on Wednesday afternoon. The 33-year-old May admitted the offence and was suspended for three games, a sanction that will be reduced to two if he attends World Rugby tackle school.

Video Spacer

England v South Africa

Watch highlights, reaction and more at RugbyPass TV

Watch Free

Video Spacer

England v South Africa

Watch highlights, reaction and more at RugbyPass TV

Watch Free

Successful completion of that initiative would free him to take part in Gloucester’s December 2 game away to Bristol after missing this Sunday’s trip to Exeter and the November 25 game at home to Leicester, his former club.

The 10-page written verdict accompanying the RFU media release included a letter written by Bath’s head of medical services, Rory Murray. It read: “I can confirm that Ollie Lawrence sustained a broken nose from the shoulder-to-head collision in the first half of the Gloucester vs Bath game.

Related

“Prior to this incident, Ollie had no previous nasal issues, nor any predisposing factors. This fracture is solely a result of the injury sustained in the game.”

A follow-up email added: “Undisplaced nasal fracture confirmed. Ollie Lawrence will remain fit for selection. He will not miss any upcoming fixtures arising from this injury.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Lawrence, in a WhatsApp message provided as evidence, stated: “During the early minutes of last night’s game, I was hit off the ball at a ruck in the face by Jonny May. He came from distance and there was a head-on-head collision.

“My nose was broken/fractured during the incident and that will obviously be with me for my career. I don’t believe it was intentional at all but the facts are the facts. Deal with it as you may.”

In his evidence, May explained in a written statement: “I did feel contact to my head, but at the time I was unaware I had made head contact with Bath 13. Due to the dynamic nature of play (linebreak, try-scoring opportunity), players are moving at speed and the change of picture changes my decision from looking to receive an offload to clearing out a defender.

“I admit I made contact with Bath 13 (head-on-head). I had no intention of hurting or making contact with Ollie Lawrence’s head. I apologise for the incident which, due to the dynamic nature of play, the change of picture and my adjustment to this all in a fraction of a second, I fail to reduce my height appropriately.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I’m relieved that Ollie was able to continue and finish the match, although I apologise for the injury caused to him. I pride myself on my work ethic and developing my game, and I will be working on my decision-making and attacking breakdown technique in training, and I will ensure I continue to improve in this area.”

In reaching its verdict, the disciplinary committee outlined: “The panel gave serious and prolonged consideration to whether this incident merited a top-end entry point. Jonny May’s actions were not intentional but were highly reckless.

“He targeted a player who was not part of a ruck and made direct head-to-head contact with sufficient speed to drive Ollie Lawrence off his feet and back over his own try line. Jonny May made little, if any, attempt to lower his body height and in targeting a player who was not part of the breakdown, his actions were always illegal.

“Jonny May had a clear line of sight to the incident and, as such, there are no factors which might excuse, even in part, the recklessness of his actions.”

  • Click here to read the 10-page disciplinary hearing short judgment form
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 50 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Young Highlanders tested by Jamie Joseph's preseason Jamie Joseph testing young Highlanders
Search