Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Just one Harlequins change as they look to reel in 14-point margin

(Photo by Steve Bardens/Getty Images for Harlequins)

Gallagher Premiership champions Harlequins have made just one change to their team to face Montpellier in this Saturday’s Heineken Champions Cup rematch in London, Will Evans coming into the XV at openside in place of Tom Lawday. It was last April when Evans fractured a tibia and he made his comeback last month after eleven months out. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Both those games were in the Premiership Rugby Cup against London Irish and Sale, but the back-rower Evans will now massively step up his comeback with a European start for Harlequins in a second leg game they go into trailing by a 14-point margin following last Sunday’s 40-26 first leg defeat in France.   

The Harlequins team announcement release read: “There is just one change to the matchday 23 as Will Evans replaces Tom Lawday in a straight swap in the number seven jersey. After scoring his first Heineken Champions Cup try, George Hammond retains his place as blindside flanker and the tight five remains the same with Quins looking to reduce a 14-point deficit.

Video Spacer

The Honey Badger – Nick Cummins joins Ryan and Max | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 29

Video Spacer

The Honey Badger – Nick Cummins joins Ryan and Max | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 29

“Harlequins’ backline is unchanged after an impressive last 30 minutes in Montpellier which saw the London side run in four tries. Similarly to the backs, Quins’ impact players remain untouched with all eight retaining their places in the matchday squad from last weekend.”

Scrum coach Adam Jones added: “If you look back at our results over the last 18 months or so it’s clear to see that it’s never over. The first-half performance wasn’t good enough, but to be only 14 points down overall with the score being 34-0 after 50 minutes is not too bad. 

Related

“Montpellier probably felt they needed more of a 21-point lead so I’m sure they will be a bit frustrated, but we know they are still going to be tough opponents back at The Stoop. We know we’re only at half-time in the tie due to the new format in the last 16 stage, but it’s up to us to reduce the deficit and we can’t afford to make the mistakes that we made in the first 40 out in Montpellier last weekend.”

HARLEQUINS (vs Montpellier, Saturday)
1. Joe Marler
2. Jack Walker
3. Will Collier
4. Matt Symons
5. Hugh Tizard
6. George Hammond
7. Will Evans
8. Alex Dombrandt (capt)
9. Danny Care
10. Marcus Smith
11. Cadan Murley
12. Andre Esterhuizen
13. Joe Marchant
14. Louis Lynagh
15. Huw Jones

ADVERTISEMENT

Replacements:
16. Joe Gray
17. Simon Kerrod
18. Wilco Louw
19. Matas Jurevicius
20. Luke Wallace
21. Lewis Gjaltema
22. Will Edwards
23. Nick David

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search