Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

‘Where’s the leadership’: Justin Marshall reacts to All Blacks’ ‘worrying’ defeat

In the early hours of Saturday morning, the sun defiantly rose over London in the wake of the All Blacks disastrous loss to the Springboks at Twickenham.

Former New Zealand halfback Justin Marshall has questioned the All Blacks’ leadership after their “worrying” 35-7 loss to South Africa ahead of next month’s Rugby World Cup.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was one of the darkest days in the history of the All Blacks. Playing against the world champion Springboks at Twickenham on Friday, the New Zealanders fell to a record-setting defeat.

First-half tries to Siya Kolisi and Kurt-Lee Arendse set the tone for the Boks, but a red card – which was the result of two yellow cards – to Scott Barrett was the final nail in the All Blacks’ coffin.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Much to the surprise of commentator Justin Marshall, the All Blacks continued to make the same mistakes time and time again during the second term as they succumbed to a disastrous defeat.

“I was really surprised to be honest, mate, that the All Blacks struggled the way they did,” Marshall said on The Platform. “They pretty much got ambushed by a side that came out super physical, super committed, was massively positive.

“I think I said during the commentary that Siya Kolisi turned down many kicking opportunities to try and accumulate points which sometimes South Africa tend to do to go for more.

“Eventually that led to obviously yellow, red cards, and the All Blacks just not being able to maintain the intensity that South Africa brought to the game.

Points Flow Chart

South Africa win +28
Time in lead
0
Mins in lead
64
0%
% Of Game In Lead
80%
67%
Possession Last 10 min
33%
7
Points Last 10 min
0

ADVERTISEMENT

“We’ve spoken for the last two weeks, three weeks mate that we needed to get our number one side out there, and needed to go out there and flex our muscles and make a statement about intent of Rugby World Cup.

“Credit to Ian Foster he named a full-strength side to a degree but they just weren’t up for it. They just mentally weren’t there and I can’t understand why.”

With coach Ian Foster at the helm, the All Blacks recorded big wins over Argentina, South Africa and Australia on their way to another Rugby Championship crown last month.

The All Blacks also claimed the Freedom Cup and Bledisloe Cup as they charged into last Friday’s Test on the back of four wins from as many starts. They looked good, very good to start their international season.

ADVERTISEMENT

But that’s what made the 35-7 scoreline so surprising. Nobody expected the Springboks to inflict such pain and despair about the All Blacks and their supporters, but records are made to be broken.

“There’s been too much read into how well the All Blacks went in The Rugby Championship in terms of how far they had come,” Marhsall added.

“I certainly feel that South Africa really did their homework. They looked at what happened to them at Mt Smart, they brought a completely different style of defence… they were a different beast.

“When you get that in the opposition, and there is a change in their DNA and the way that they’re playing, then you’ve got to recognise that really quickly and adjust and that’s exactly what the All Blacks didn’t do, they did the opposite.

Related

“They looked stunned, they looked shocked, they looked clueless as to how they could find a way to break down the aggressive line speed that South Africa brought.”

Coach Foster named a near full-strength side to take on the Boks, too, which is “worrying” going into the Rugby World Cup.

All Blacks Brodie Retallick and Shannon Frizell missed the Test due to injury, but the rest of the starting side was practically at full strength.

“The All Blacks, which is worrying…the side they put out was full of experience, been to World Cups before, there’s enough personnel out there to know, ‘Okay, the opposition is doing this to us, we’ve got to adjust, we’ve got to adapt’ (and) didn’t.

“That’s the thing that really bemused me; the fact they weren’t able to combat it and just simply continued to do the same things that revolved around them making the same mistakes and getting themselves under the same pressure and huge ill-discipline because they weren’t coping.

“Where’s the leadership?”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

19 Comments
K
Kathy 479 days ago

Agree with Justin re leadership, however Sam Cane should never have been picked as Captain from the start..

M
Mike 480 days ago

Wrong coach, wrong captain, wrong fullback. What gets me is there was no evidence of a Plan B or C from Sam Cane, he's so one dimensional. Someone like McCaw always adapted superbly onfield when things were going wrong and so can Sam Whitelock who should always have kept the captaincy. France v South Africa for the final - vive le France!!

G
Greg 480 days ago

Agree with Justin. If Cane isn't there for his leadership attributes - and he can't be on the evidence of Dunedin and Twickenham - then what is he doing there? Noticeable in Dunedin that it was Whitelock who led by example in the second half. Cane is lost when the shit hits the fan. WTF were those winks about?

C
Chesterfield 480 days ago

Where was Marshall’s leadership when he allowed himself to get assaulted off the pitch trying to milk penalties and lost another World Cup game. If he spent less time being a shock jock, mouthy git he might have been more successful in winning tournaments.

M
Miha 480 days ago

Justin Marshall is a goose commentator- we are targeted from the outset from officialdom like we have a larger magnifying set of eyes on every single play and believe me if they can spot anything that remotely conceivable look like an infringement or error they go straight to TMO I thought World Rugby already laid restrictions on TMO involvement the only referee that ever had the balls of he’s own conviction was Nigel Owens and southern hemisphere refs this World Cup is going to be a shit storm - 37 minutes of actual play out of 137 minutes if game time how the F#%*k is that entertaining just say it Marshall the adjudication is an an abomination and needs a rocket up where the sun don’t shine - there ya go I said it “and ya can take that to the bank” remembered that line from a movie ha ha ha

T
Tristan 480 days ago

It's been an unfortunate trait of AB teams for many years that they appear unable to react to winning opposition strategy by changing their own game plan on the hoof. It seems that they train to play a certain way and then that's it, there simply isn't a plan b.

k
kiwinige 480 days ago

Well we got rugby league from the wingers who wanted to have less set pieces so maybe we should have set piece Union with no backline ?

S
Sherry 480 days ago

A bad day at the office. Get over it.

T
Toddy 480 days ago

Marshy is right, they were played off the park in every facet. Plus the 7-1 split probably got inside their heads. It's definitely worrying for kiwi fans

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search