Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Karmichael Hunt's rugby career set to be in limbo as Reds prepare for release

Karmichael Hunt poses for a photograph for the Queensland Reds after his signing. (Photo by Matt Roberts/Getty Images)

The Queensland Reds look set to move on from Karmichael Hunt, according to reports by the Sydney Morning Herald.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Reds and Hunt’s management are close to finalising an agreement to release him from the final year of his contract at Ballymore in 2019, and it could be done by Christmas.

Hunt is still contracted to Rugby Australia after agreeing to an extension shortly before his second drugs controversy almost a year ago. With Brad Thorn’s hardline stance towards off-field behaviour involving illicit substances forcing Hunt to play club rugby, he was unlikely to play for the Reds again while Thorn was there.

Despite having a contract with RA, without a Super Rugby contract it is unclear what Hunt will do in the interim. The Waratahs have been suggested as a landing spot for Hunt with Wallabies coach Michael Cheika still holding an interest in Hunt’s potential.

The release would officially spell the end of one of the worst signings in Reds history, as they doubled-down on Hunt but didn’t receive the value of his contract as one of the highest paid players in Australia.

The original signing at the back end of 2014 on a reported whopping $600,000 per year over 3-years was a massive risk for a 28-year-old Hunt attempting to make a code-switch at such a late stage in his career. The Reds coughed up every dollar as Rugby Australia did not endorse a top-up arrangement at the time.

Under the misguided direction of Richard Graham, the Reds floundered and Hunt’s transition to rugby in 2015 quickly underdelivered. Just weeks into the new season Hunt became embroiled in a drugs scandal from his time in the AFL on the Gold Coast, however, the Reds kept Hunt on the books and suspended him for six weeks in addition to a $30,000 fine.

ADVERTISEMENT

The suspension limited any chance that his first season would yield success and effectively became a write-off. Hunt’s performances marginally improved over the following two seasons and he was able to earn a Wallabies debut in 2017. With the Reds in turmoil and in the middle of a coaching turnstile, the first contract was overall an underwhelming failure considering the money spent.

Rugby Australia came to the table a second time around, enabling the Reds to re-sign the 30-year-old Hunt on a reduced two-year deal. The signing was announced only a month before Hunt’s second drugs scandal in December 2017.

His Spring tour with the Wallabies in November 2017 was the last time he played a professional rugby game, as he was omitted from the entire Reds 2018 season. His return to the field came in July as Souths Rugby Club in Brisbane opened the door for Hunt to play club rugby.

The four-year Hunt-saga looks to be finally coming to a conclusion for the Reds who gambled and lost on the former NRL star.

ADVERTISEMENT

In other news:

Video Spacer

 

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search