Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

WRU was an 'unforgiving, even vindictive' environment - Key questions answered

By PA
(Photo by Catherine Ivill/Getty Images)

The Welsh Rugby Union has been left reeling by a damning independent review into behaviour at all levels within the organisation.

ADVERTISEMENT

The review, which was launched in February this year, followed a BBC programme that reported allegations of racism, sexism, misogyny and homophobia connected to the governing body.

Here, the PA news agency looks at the issues.

What was the starting point?

A BBC programme aired in January 2023 probed the culture at the WRU and saw a number of its former employees make accusations about their time at the organisation. Charlotte Wathan, general manager of women’s rugby until her resignation in early 2022, claimed offensive comments by a colleague left her in tears and feeling sick, while another unnamed contributor says she was left contemplating suicide by her experiences of bullying and sexism at work. Incidents of racism and homophobia were also alleged.

Related

What was the immediate fall-out?

WRU chief executive Steve Phillips resigned from his post later that month, with former Wales rugby international and Olympic hurdler Nigel Walker taking over the role on an interim basis. The WRU also announced an independent review would be commissioned, and Walker said: “You come up for a compelling argument for change because where we are now is not sustainable. If we are not prepared to change, the future of Welsh rugby and the Welsh Rugby Union is in danger. I can’t put it any more bluntly than that.”

What form did the review panel take and what was its remit?

The panel was chaired by former Court of Appeal judge Dame Anne Rafferty, with ex-England rugby international Maggie Alphonsi and Quentin Smith also appointed. David Lawson acted as counsel to the inquiry. Under its terms of reference, the panel’s role was to investigate allegations of sexism, misogyny, homophobia and racism. The panel’s scope included covering culture of the WRU, actions and behaviour at all levels within the WRU, the extent to which employees felt able to voice concerns or challenge inappropriate and discriminatory language and behaviour, effectiveness of the WRU’s whistleblowing policy procedures and the WRU’s actions in response to individual complaints set out in the BBC Wales programme.

What did the panel discover?

A 134-page report was published on November 14. The report found that the WRU was an “unforgiving, even vindictive” environment to work in for some of its employees, and witnesses interviewed reported feelings of powerlessness and fear, with the review identifying a workplace that “contained elements of bullying and discrimination” and was experienced as “toxic” by some employees. Examples of discrimination reported included the sharing of gossip that a female staff member had “slept her way” into her job, use of the phrase “hello sugar t***” and the use of slurs about women in same-sex relationships.

What has been recommended and what is the WRU’s response?

The panel made 36 recommendations, including a need for more transparency. The WRU was urged to align clearly and publicly with inclusion and diversity, and the report also called for further investment in the women’s and girls’ game, with spending in line with other unions after the review found it was not “properly supported and developed”. The WRU had already committed to ensuring that all of the recommendations are actioned, and WRU chair Richard Collier-Keywood said: “We have let people down. We have to do better and we will.”

Has the WRU already started making changes?

Yes. In June, Collier-Keywood became the WRU’s first independently-appointed chair – previous chairs were elected by the WRU’s member clubs – and the WRU’s first female chief executive Abi Tierney will start work in January. A reformed WRU board will include a combination of appointed and elected directors. Six of the appointed directors have been announced, with four of them being women. Collier-Keywood says that progress has been made on improving employment practices. The WRU’s women’s high-performance programme, meanwhile, has received significant investment, with 32 full-time playing contracts now in place. A wider strategy for women’s and girls’ rugby will be delivered in 2024.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
BeamMeUp 1 hour ago
The Springboks have something you don't have

A few comments. Firstly, I am a Bok fan and it's been a golden period for us. I hope my fellow Bok fans appreciate this time and know that it cannot last forever, so soak it all in!


The other thing to mention (and this is targeted at Welsh, English and even Aussie supporters who might be feeling somewhat dejected) is that it's easy to forget that just before Rassie Erasmus took over in 2018, the Boks were ranked 7th in the world and I had given up hope we'd ever be world beaters again.


Sport is a fickle thing and Rassie and his team have managed to get right whatever little things it takes to make a mediocre team great. I initially worried his methods might be short-lived (how many times can you raise a person's commitment by talking about his family and his love of his country as a motivator), but he seems to have found a way. After winning in 2019 on what was a very simple game plan, he has taken things up ever year - amazing work which has to be applauded! (Dankie Rassie! Ons wardeer wat jy vir die ondersteuners en die land doen!) (Google translate if you don't understand Afrikaans! 😁)


I don't think people outside South Africa fully comprehend the enormity of the impact seeing black and white, English, Afrikaans and Xhosa and all the other hues playing together does for the country's sense of unity. It's pure joy and happiness.


This autumn tour has been a bit frustrating in that the Boks have won, but never all that convincingly. On the one hand, I'd like to have seen more decisive victories, BUT what Rassie has done is expose a huge number of players to test rugby, whilst also diversifying the way the Boks play (Tony Brown's influence).


This change of both style and personnel has resulted in a lack of cohesion at times and we've lost some of the control, whereas had we been playing our more traditional style, that wouldn't happen. This is partially attributable to the fact that you cannot play Tony Brown's expansive game whilst also having 3 players available at every contact point to clear the defence off the ball. I have enjoyed seeing the Boks play a more exciting, less attritional game, which is a boring, albeit effective spectacle. So, I am happy to be patient, because the end justifies the means (and I trust Rassie!). Hopefully all these players we are blooding will give us incredible options for substitutions come next year's Rugby Championship and of course, the big prize in 2027.


Last point! The game of rugby has never been as exciting as it is now. Any of Ireland, New Zealand, South Africa, France, Argentina, Scotland, England & Australia can beat one another. South Africa may be ranked #1, but I wouldn't bet my house in them beating France or New Zealand, and we saw Argentina beating both South Africa and New Zealand this year! That's wonderful for the game and makes the victories we do get all the sweeter. Each win is 100% earned. Long may it last!


Sorry for the long post! 🏉🌍

12 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: Willie le Roux rumours ignite after Bok star spotted Fissler Confidential: Willie le Roux rumours ignite after Bok star spo
Search