Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Kiwi columnist blasted for 'disgusting' take on women's rugby

(Photo / Getty Images)

A Kiwi columnist has been blasted on social media for his take on the women’s game in a respected New Zealand rugby magazine.

ADVERTISEMENT

Writing for Rugby News, radio personality Sam Casey described New Zealand Rugby’s [NZR] investment in women’s rugby as “hush money” as he claimed “there is absolutely no rhyme or reason as to why the Black Ferns or Black Ferns Sevens girls get paid the amount they do”.

Casey also took issue with the fact that the Farah Palmer Cup went ahead last year while other rugby programmes – such as the Heartland Championship, New Zealand Under 20s, New Zealand sevens and New Zealand Schools teams – were cut due to the financial impact of COVID-19.

Video Spacer

Quinn Tupaea named to start for All Blacks and partners Rieko Ioane against Tonga

Video Spacer

Quinn Tupaea named to start for All Blacks and partners Rieko Ioane against Tonga

“Need I remind you that during that time, hard-working Kiwis employed by NZR were losing their jobs, our national game was bleeding cash, but yet they [women rugby players] saw fit to jump up and down kicking and screaming until they got what they wanted,” Casey wrote in a column headlined ‘Hands Out, Not Up’.

“The cost of running some Probables vs Possibles game for the Black Ferns and the Farah Palmer Cup competition would be enormous, both of which are run at a huge loss.

“Yet the women didn’t have the decency to see that, during COVID-19 times, such fixtures were most definitely a luxury and not a necessity?”

In 2018, a landmark deal was reached between NZR and the New Zealand Rugby Players’ Association that would ensure 30 Black Ferns employed by NZR will receive annual retainers of between $15,000 and $30,000 in addition to their weekly assembly fees of $2000.

ADVERTISEMENT

By comparison, New Zealand’s top All Blacks reportedly earn close to $1m per annum, while reports from last year suggest regular, lesser-profile All Blacks command between $450,000 and $600,000 per year.

Furthermore, the All Blacks receive weekly assembly fees of $7500 for every week they are in camp, while the triumphant 2015 World Cup were paid a winning bonus of $160,000.

The Black Ferns, meanwhile, were paid nothing at the time of their 2017 World Cup success in the United Kingdom.

Fully contracted Super Rugby players in New Zealand are also paid between $75,000 to $195,000 per year.

ADVERTISEMENT

There is currently no women’s Super Rugby competition in New Zealand, although the Blues and Chiefs staged the first-ever women’s Super Rugby match in the country in a one-off fixture two months ago.

Casey went on to take aim at Wellington Farah Palmer Cup player and outspoken women’s rugby advocate Alice Soper for her effort to “publicly spray NZR about doing everything possible to ensure the All Blacks play, but not the Black Ferns”.

In an interview with RNZ last May, Soper called on NZR to be more transparent about the future of the Farah Palmer Cup amid uncertainty brought on by COVID-19.

“Our game is only going to get better, we are not even near the full potential yet so don’t cut us off now we are just getting started,” she said at the time.

“People were really starting to look at what our potential was and now it is not a question of will we play on a main field, it’s a question of will we get to play and that sucks.”

However, Casey labelled her as “detached from reality” as he described New Zealand’s national women’s teams and the Farah Palmer Cup as “nothing but a cost”.

“She [Soper] honestly believed that during such horrific economic times, the NZR shouldn’t have prioritised the biggest money spinners in the game, the ones that pay for the competition she plays in, the ones that pay the wages of the Black Ferns, over teams that are nothing but a cost. It’s astounding.”

Casey claimed “a lot of the revenue earners, the All Blacks and Super Rugby players of this country, are well and truly fed up” as he called on NZR to “take care of those who make the game in this country what it is”.

He suggested other All Blacks are in line to follow Ngani Laumape abroad after feeling “short-changed” as a result of the “hush money being given to women’s game”.

“My advice to NZR is that it needs to stop being held to ransom. Enough of the hush money. If it starts to become all too much, get yaself [sic] a pair of earplugs.”

Casey’s column attracted plenty of criticism on Twitter after Soper described the piece as a “90s style throwback” when she shared it to her 2,437 followers on Thursday.

“Imagine being so powerful, that a dude you don’t know is still mad about an opinion you expressed (and still stand by!) over a year ago,” she said.

“Turns out, I’m that powerful in Sam Casey’s mind. Thanks for the publicity baaaabes!”

Soper’s tweet has, at the time of writing, drawn 131 likes, 19 retweets and 22 replies, most of which have condemned Casey for his article.

“Absolutely disgusting column. Backwards redneck stuff. A lot of good blokes out there support the women’s game but too many are like Sammy here,” one user wrote.

“WTF did I just read? Words fail me. What a dick,” another wrote.

The column evoked a retweet from Sky Sport commentator Taylah Johnson, a Samoa and Counties Manukau women’s representative, who captioned her tweet with a vomiting emoji.

Canterbury women’s cricket representative Kristy Havill also retweeted the column, of which she said was “disheartening to read on a number of levels”.

One Twitter user invited Casey to “run it straight” at Soper, while others questioned the “chauvinistic rabble” of “someone who’s claim to fame is taking an All Black into the wrong student flat”.

In 2018, Casey made headlines when police were called to a Dunedin student flat in the early hours of a Sunday morning after he and All Blacks star Jordie Barrett entered the property eating McDonald’s mistakenly thinking it was a friend’s place.

Before that, Casey rose to prominence for his infamous pre-match speeches for the Highlanders during their play-offs run in the lead-up to their first-ever Super Rugby title in 2015.

Formerly a host of Highlanders TV and radio presenter for NZME, Casey has joined newly-formed radio station SENZ as a producer for the station’s 4-7pm show, which is hosted by Sky Sport presenter Kirstie Stanway and ex-All Blacks first-five Stephen Donald.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 5 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

7 Go to comments
J
JW 9 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Watch: Retallick scores, Perenara makes Black Rams debut -Japan Rugby League One Retallick scores; Perenara makes debut -Japan Rugby League
Search