Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Kiwi rugby stars at odds over who should start for the All Blacks between Beauden Barrett and Richie Mo'unga

(Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images

As the debate rages on among New Zealand rugby followers as to who should start at first-five for the All Blacks between Beauden Barrett and Richie Mo’unga, two Kiwi stars have given their verdicts on the predicament.

ADVERTISEMENT

Much has been made about who should don the No. 10 jersey in New Zealand’s first test of the year against the Wallabies in Wellington on Sunday.

Mo’unga shone as arguably the form player of Super Rugby Aotearoa as he guided the Crusaders to their fourth title in as many years, but he is in direct competition with two-time World Rugby Player of the Year Barrett, who remains one of the world’s top players, for a starting role.

Video Spacer

The Breakdown | Episode 37

Video Spacer

The Breakdown | Episode 37

Speaking on the Aotearoa Rugby Pod, former All Blacks hooker James Parsons and Maori All Blacks halfback Bryn Hall were at odds over who should be handed the playmaking reigns to start the international season.

Parsons, a Blues veteran of eight years, believes his franchise teammate Barrett deserves the starting first-five role due to the attacking threat he poses.

“I think Beauden, with his speed – like I agree Richie’s probably the form 10 – but I like Beauden in the 10 jersey and I think he has to be on the field,” Parsons said.

“I think when he plays flat, you just have to be on him, and you’re not on, he’ll go. He’s just got that speed, that tempo, and he’s good enough.”

ADVERTISEMENT

However, as Mo’unga’s halves teammate at the Crusaders for the past four years, Hall disagreed.

“Nah, Richie for me, mate,” he said. “I got to say that as a teammate and Jip’s [Parsons] got to say that as a teammate as well.”

Given both Mo’unga and Barrett started alongside each other for the All Blacks at last year’s World Cup – Mo’unga at first-five and Barrett at fullback – the selection situation extends to who will fill New Zealand’s No. 15 jersey.

https://www.instagram.com/tv/CGBuClggtXm/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

While Parsons and Hall sided with their Super Rugby teammates regarding the No. 10 role, both players agreed that Hurricanes star Jordie Barrett warranted selection at fullback.

“I just think Jordie has to be at fullback, doesn’t he? His ability in the air, his ability to kick, his decision-making, offload, his passing,” Parsons said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“He definitely deserves a crack.”

The pair subsequently expected changes to the way in which the All Blacks’ playing style on attack without the dual playmaking axis between Mo’unga and Barrett.

“It’ll be interesting as well, because if you in that World Cup, they wanted Beaudy and Richie, and the game plan kind of dictated that with how they wanted to play,” Hall said.

“They wanted to play with a bit of width, get it to the second pair of hands with Beaudy there being able to play both sides of the field, so if they lose that and have just Richie or Beaudy, will there be changes in their game plan from what they wanted to do at the World Cup?”

Parsons seemed to think so, noting: “We’re talking a hell of a lot about the Wallabies and what they’re going to do, but at the end of the day, the All Blacks are probably going to have a style change. It’s not just going to be the same 1-3-3-1 split attack.

“It could look a lot different to us as well, so there is the unknown on both sides if you really think about it because they’re going to come out of a World Cup review and know that they’re going to have to evolve and change. 

“What that looks like, we don’t know.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

A
AllyOz 22 hours ago
Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?

I will preface this comment by saying that I hope Joe Schmidt continues for as long as he can as I think he has done a tremendous job to date. He has, in some ways, made the job a little harder for himself by initially relying on domestic based players and never really going over the top with OS based players even when he relaxed his policy a little more. I really enjoy how the team are playing at the moment.


I think Les Kiss, because (1) he has a bit more international experience, (2) has previously coached with Schmidt and in the same setup as Schmidt, might provide the smoothest transition, though I am not sure that this necessarily needs to be the case.


I would say one thing though about OS versus local coaches. I have a preference for local coaches but not for the reason that people might suppose (certainly not for the reason OJohn will have opined - I haven't read all the way down but I think I can guess it).


Australia has produced coaches of international standing who have won World Cups and major trophies. Bob Dwyer, Rod Macqueen, Alan Jones, Michael Cheika and Eddie Jones. I would add John Connolly - though he never got the international success he was highly successful with Queensland against quality NZ opposition and I think you could argue, never really got the run at international level that others did (OJohn might agree with that bit). Some of those are controversial but they all achieved high level results. You can add to that a number of assistants who worked OS at a high level.


But what the lack of a clear Australian coach suggests to me is that we are no longer producing coaches of international quality through our systems. We have had some overseas based coaches in our system like Thorn and Wessels and Cron (though I would suggest Thorn was a unique case who played for Australia in one code and NZ in the other and saw himself as a both a NZer and a Queenslander having arrived here at around age 12). Cron was developed in the Australian system anyway, so I don't have a problem with where he was born.


But my point is that we used to have systems in Australia that produced world class coaches. The systems developed by Dick Marks, which adopted and adapted some of the best coaching training approaches at the time from around the world (Wales particularly) but focussed on training Australian coaches with the best available methods, in my mind (as someone who grew up and began coaching late in that era) was a key part of what produced the highly skilled players that we produced at the time and also that produced those world class coaches. I think it was slipping already by the time I did my Level II certificate in 2002 and I think Eddie Jones influence and the priorities of the executive, particularly John O'Neill, might have been the beginning of the end. But if we have good coaching development programmes at school and junior level that will feed through to representative level then we will have


I think this is the missing ingredient that both ourselves and, ironically, Wales (who gave us the bones of our coaching system that became world leading), is a poor coaching development system. Fix that and you start getting players developing basic skills better and earlier in their careers and this feeds through all the way through the system and it also means that, when coaching positions at all levels come up, there are people of quality to fill them, who feed through the system all the way to the top. We could be exporting more coaches to Japan and England and France and the UK and the USA, as we have done a bit in the past.


A lack of a third tier between SR and Club rugby might block this a little - but I am not sure that this alone is the reason - it does give people some opportunity though to be noticed and play a key role in developing that next generation of players coming through. And we have never been able to make the cost sustainable.


I don't think it matters that we have an OS coach as our head coach at the moment but I think it does tell us something about overall rugby ecosystem that, when a coaching appointment comes up, we don't have 3 or 4 high quality options ready to take over. The failure of our coaching development pathway is a key missing ingredient for me and one of the reasons our systems are failing.

131 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Gaston Mieres: 'Rugby has been an addiction - a good one' Gaston Mieres: 'Rugby has been an addiction - a good one'
Search