Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'You've got the job': Kiwi scribe slams Steve Borthwick's 'bizarre comments'

England Steve Borthwick with assistant Kevin Sinfield (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

England began their new era under head coach Steve Borthwick with a stunning Calcutta Cup loss against fierce rivals Scotland at Twickenham last weekend.

ADVERTISEMENT

But Borthwick didn’t take responsibility for the loss, instead he pinned the blame on a legendary coach who calls Australia home once again.

Following on from last year’s disappointing campaign, England need to find some form ahead of this year’s Rugby World Cup in France.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Cast aside as a fallen giant of the sport, the Rugby Football Union made the stunning decision to part ways with Eddie Jones in December.

While the news came as a shock to many fans and pundits, it was the risk England needed to take ahead of the sport’s most prestigious event.

But things have gone from bad to worse.

England were beaten in a thrilling Calcutta Cup clash to start their Six Nations campaign, as they went down fighting 23-29 to Scotland.

Borthwick has insisted in the past that the national team have plenty of work to do, and made sure to throw another jab at Jones following the defeat.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I’ve been frank from day one in saying there’s a lot of work to do,” Borthwick said after the loss to Scotland.

“When I looked at the team in the autumn… we weren’t good at anything. It was as frank as that.”

Meanwhile, Jones has launched his own podcast and is preparing to lead the Wallabies to this year’s World Cup after replacing Dave Rennie.

Borthwick was announced as England head coach about two months ago, and has plenty of time to make any changes that he deemed necessary.

ADVERTISEMENT

New Zealand rugby journalist Jamie Wall has slammed Borthwick’s “bizarre” comments, saying the loss was definitely his “fault.”

“Some pretty bizarre comments from Borthwick after that game,” Wall told SENZ Mornings.

“I think people weren’t probably expecting him to turn this team around straight away (but) facing Scotland at home is a game that English fans kind of expect to win, so that still would have been disappointing.

“But to come out and sort of say, ‘Well this isn’t my fault,’ like mate, you’ve got the job now, you’ve got the players, I don’t know what else they’re going to pick.

Related

“I don’t follow English club rugby that particularly closely but I don’t really know of there being too many guys that are banging on the door that Steve Borthwick hasn’t taken any notice of.

“If there are, well that’s your fault for not picking them, mate.”

As the countdown to this year’s World Cup continues, every team will be analysing their results and combinations as they chase rugby immortality in France.

For England, they’ve continued to persist with a new-look 10-12 combination despite their lacklustre results.

Harlequins pivot Marcus Smith has become a regular custodian of the No. 10 jersey, while Owen Farrell continues to lead the team from the midfield.

But as Wall explain, England might to “axe one of them” if they want to turn their form around.

“There are enough good players in there, they’ve got a very solid front row or tight five as it were (and) some talented loose forwards,” Wall added.

“Their biggest issue (is) they’ve got Marcus Smith and Owen Farrell… they have two playmakers that they’re trying to shoehorn into the same team.

“If Borthwick is going to make a big call it’s that he’s going to have to axe one of them and build his team around the other one.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

4 Comments
R
Roy 652 days ago

Pretty sure that Borthwick was not avoiding responsibility. The truth is, England have been pretty toothless, have given away soft tries, have been pinged far too much at the ruck and don't have a top 5 scrum, or lineout.

He's just speaking facts.

England were quicker at the ruck, the scrum did "OK", the lineout creaked and had to go to quick ball at 2, which is easy to defend so a mixed bag. But most importantly England still made defensive errors, or dropped the ball from a restart after scoring and inviting pressure.

If you were being positive you could say there were baby steps made, but otherwise, it looks like it's going to take a while.

M
Mike 653 days ago

Before the game I was concerned with the pack. 2 props who are not top drawer scrummagers and a mixed bag of a back row. Rapava-Ruskin is a far superior scrummager and in the back row Pearson and Hill are better than what was on show and as for Willis I presume it was due to being recalled by his team.
Al this I posted before the match so it is not hindsight.
Interesting to read a Scottish report that said the game was won not by VDM but by their back row who were superb.

I
Ian 653 days ago

All this ballyhoo is nothing but belittling the Scotland team. England are still a great team as I’m sure we will see in upcoming matches. The fact of the matter is that Scotland are a team that looks poised to peak and be one of the best Scottish sides we have seen in a long time. Just say you were beat by the better team on the day and move on. As the Australian joke goes.

' How can you tell that an English plane has landed at Sydney airport ? '

' Because the whining goes on after they've turned the engines off '

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

286 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The appointment I would make to save Steve Borthwick – Andy Goode The appointment I would make to save Steve Borthwick – Andy Goode
Search