Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Kockott faces enormous ban as EPCR cite multiple players

(Photo by Laurence Griffiths/Getty Images)

Castres veteran scrum half Rory Kockott could face a ban of up to four years after being cited over an alleged eye gouge during their Champions Cup game with Munster at the weekend.

ADVERTISEMENT

The complaint against the South African-born French international was made by the match Citing Commissioner, Chris Catling.

In a statement competition organisers said: “EPCR has received a citing complaint against the Castres Olympique scrum half, Rory Kockott (No 9), arising from his club’s Heineken Champions Cup, Round 4 match against Munster Rugby at Stade Pierre Fabre on Saturday, 15 December 2018.

“Kockott is alleged to have made contact with the eye and/or eye area of the Munster wing forward, Chris Cloete (No 7), in the 21st minute of the match in contravention of Law 9.12.

“Pamela Woodman (Scotland), Chair, Anthony Davies (England) and Leon Lloyd (England) have been appointed as the independent Disciplinary Committee for hearing which will take place in Paris tomorrow (Wednesday, 19 December).

Kockott will face a hearing in Paris on Wednesday and if he’s found guilty the minimum ban he faces is 12 weeks. A mid-range punishment is 18 weeks, with a top end punishment from 24 weeks to 4 years.

Castres replacement hooker, Marc-Antoine Rallier, is also in hot water with the authorities.

ADVERTISEMENT

The EPCR statement said “Rallier is alleged to have tackled the Munster wing forward, Peter O’Mahony (No 6), dangerously in the 69th minute of the match in contravention of Law 9.13.

“Pamela Woodman (Scotland), Chair, Anthony Davies (England) and Leon Lloyd (England) have been appointed as the independent Disciplinary Committee for hearing which will take place in Paris tomorrow (Wednesday, 19 December).

If found guilty he would face a minimum ban of 2 weeks, with a mid-range punishment of 6 weeks with the top end ranging from 10 weeks up to a year.

Elsewhere Lyon second row, Etienne Oosthuizen is also facing a ban following his red card during his club’s Heineken Champions Cup, Round 4 match against Glasgow Warriors at Scotstoun on Saturday.

ADVERTISEMENT

Oosthuizen was sent off by referee, Ben Whitehouse (Wales), in the 70th minute of the match for striking the Glasgow Warriors fly half, Adam Hastings (No 10), with his arm in contravention of Law 9.12.

Jeremy Summers (England), Chair, Rory Bannerman (Scotland) and Val Toma (Romania) have been appointed as the independent Disciplinary Committee for hearing which will take place in Paris tomorrow (Wednesday, 19 December).

The punishment starts at 2 weeks, with a mid-range punishment of 6 weeks and the top end ban of 10 to 52 weeks.

Watch: Exceptional Stories: Ian McKinley
[brightcove-vide id=”5979073493001″]

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

A
Another 1 hour ago
Razor's 2024 All Blacks Christmas wish list

"It seems like the idea of Ardie Savea moving to openside flanker is no longer on the table"


Says who? Savea was picked on the open side, with Wallace Sititi at 8, against France. It makes no difference to Savea’s game, whatsoever and allows Sititi to play in his preferred position. It also provides an option to bring in a third loose forward that may provide a better lineout option and a big body to compete with some of the big bodies found in other teams.


It was unfortunate that Finau was injured so early on against France before he had a chance to show how he might combine with Savea and Sititi, and there is still a possibility that Hoskins Sotutu might be effective alongside them too.


Don’t count out viable options.

24 Go to comments
S
SK 13 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Set pieces are important and the way teams use them is a great indication of how they play the game. No team is showcasing their revolution more than the Springboks. This year they have mauled less and primarily in the attacking third. Otherwise they have tended to set like they are going to maul and then play around the corner or shove the ball out the back. They arent also hitting the crash ball carrier constantly but instead they are choosing to use their width or a big carrying forward in wider areas. While their maul is varied the scrum is still a blunt instrument winning penalties before the backs have a go. Some teams have chosen to blunt their set piece game for more control. The All Blacks are kicking more penalties and are using their powerful scrum as an attacking tool choosing that set piece as an attacking weapon. Their willingness to maul more and in different positions is also becoming more prominent. The French continue to play conservative rugby off the set piece using their big bruisers frequently. The set piece is used differently by different teams. Different teams play different ways and can be successful regardless. They can win games with little territory and possession or smash teams with plenty of both. The game of rugby is for all types and sizes and thats true in the modern era. I hope that administrators keep it that way and dont go further towards a Rugby League style situation. Some administrators are of the opinion that rugby is too slow and needs to be sped up. Why not rather empower teams to choose how they want to play and create a framework that favours neither size nor agility. That favours neither slow tempo play or rock n roll rugby. Create a game that favour both and challenge teams to execute their plans. If World Rugby can create a game like that then it will be the ultimate winner.

35 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Kieran Read names his 2025 British and Irish Lions captain Kieran Read names his 2025 British and Irish Lions captain
Search