Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Kurtley Beale cleared on rape charge after 2 hours of jury deliberation

(Photo by Bradley Kanaris/Getty Images)

Over two weeks, a trial has heard graphic and intimate details of the night Kurtley Beale was accused of raping a woman in the bathroom of a Sydney pub.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the end, it took a jury two hours to find the rugby star not guilty of all charges.

The former Wallaby playmaker was cleared of one count of sexual intercourse without consent and two counts of sexual touching.

The verdicts, handed down in the NSW District Court on Friday, prompted tears and sighs of relief from those present to support Beale, including his wife Maddi.

Video Spacer

New Wallabies coach Joe Schmidt media briefing

Video Spacer

New Wallabies coach Joe Schmidt media briefing

Beale, who was seated in the dock as the verdicts were delivered hung his head in an apparent show of relief.

Speaking outside the court, the 35-year-old said the allegations had taken a major toll on him and his family.

“I’ve always maintained my innocence,” Beale told reporters.

“My family and I have suffered a terrible year and I’m so glad that the truth has come out.”

Beale’s lawyer, Margaret Cunneen SC, said justice was done with the decision.

The rugby international was charged in January 2023 after the woman told police he touched her buttocks and forced her to perform oral sex in a toilet cubicle at Bondi’s Beach Road Hotel the previous month.

ADVERTISEMENT

But the jury rejected the woman’s account that Beale followed her into the cubicle of the men’s toilet, removed his penis from his pants and forced it into her mouth.

A secretly recorded phone call captured the moment the woman confronted Beale with the allegations, prompting him to apologise, saying he had “misread the situation”.

“I’m so sorry I made you feel like this I misjudged the whole situation,” Beale said.

“Now I’m f***ing nervous.”

Ms Cunneen told the jury detectives had believed Beale’s response to be “game, set and match” in proving his guilt.

But, she said, on the contrary it showed Beale had been under the belief his interaction with the woman was consensual.

ADVERTISEMENT

During the trial, Ms Cunneen labelled the alleged victim “manipulative” and asserted she had concocted the alleged rape as a way of gaining sympathy from her fiance.

Crown prosecutor Jeff Tunks invited the jury to accept the woman’s version of events that Beale engaged sexually with her despite her repeatedly telling him “no”.

The woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons, said during the trial she was using the men’s toilets to avoid queues at the women’s when Beale entered and locked the cubicle.

She said she looked up to see Beale holding his penis and shaking it up and down while saying “suck my dick”, to which she replied “no” over and over.

Beale is expected to apply for costs to help cover his legal expenses. (Duncan Murray/AAP PHOTOS)
The woman claimed the rugby star then grabbed her head and thrust his penis forcefully into her mouth.

One of the charges of sexual touching – rejected by the jury – was an allegation that Beale placed his hands on the woman’s hips while they were still in the cubicle and turned her around while saying, “Come on, let’s f***.”

The other sexual touching charge, on which Beale was also found not guilty,  asserted he touched the woman on the backside before the pair were in the cubicle together.

The woman said she was with friends and her fiance at the venue when she felt a hand move down her buttocks onto “bare skin”.

“I turn around and realise it’s Mr Beale,” she told the jury.

Crown prosecutor Jeff Tunks conceded there were inconsistencies in the version of events the woman gave to family members and police.

However, he asked them to consider how she was acting and whether that was consistent with someone who had been the victim of a sexual assault.

“It’s clear that she gives different accounts, different aspects, to different people,” Mr Tunks told the jury.

“Unlawful sexual contact may affect people in different ways.”

Beale is expected to apply for costs to help cover his legal expenses.

1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732)

National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
S
Sumkunn Tsadmiova 283 days ago

“She said she looked up to see Beale holding his p*nis and shaking it up and down while saying “suck my dick””

And they say the age of romance is dead….

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Where? I remember saying "unders"? The LNR was formed by the FFR, if I said that in a way that meant the 'pro' side of the game didn't have an equal representation/say as the 'amateur' side (FFR remit) that was not my intent.


But also, as it is the governing body, it also has more responsibility. As long as WR looks at FFR as the running body for rugby in France, that 'power' will remain. If the LNR refuses to govern their clubs use of players to enable a request by FFR (from WR) to ensure it's players are able to compete in International rugby takes place they will simply remove their participation. If the players complain to the France's body, either of their health and safety concerns (through playing too many 'minutes' etc) or that they are not allowed to be part in matches of national interest, my understanding is action can be taken against the LNR like it could be any other body/business. I see where you're coming from now re EPCR and the shake up they gave it, yes, that wasn't meant to be a separate statement to say that FFR can threaten them with EPCR expulsion by itself, simply that it would be a strong repercussion for those teams to be removed (no one would want them after the above).


You keep bringing up these other things I cannot understand why. Again, do you think if the LNR were not acting responsibly they would be able to get away with whatever they want (the attitude of these posters saying "they pay the players")? You may deem what theyre doing currently as being irresponsible but most do not. Countries like New Zealand have not even complained about it because they've never had it different, never got things like windfall TV contracts from France, so they can't complain because theyre not missing out on anything. Sure, if the French kept doing things like withholding million dollar game payments, or causing millions of dollars of devaluation in rights, they these things I'm outlining would be taking place. That's not the case currently however, no one here really cares what the French do. It's upto them to sort themselves out if they're not happy. Now, that said, if they did make it obvious to World Rugby that they were never going to send the French side away (like they possibly did stating their intent to exclude 20 targeted players) in July, well then they would simply be given XV fixtures against tier 2 sides during that window and the FFR would need to do things like the 50/50 revenue split to get big teams visiting in Nov.

307 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Steve Borthwick hung his troops out to dry - he should take some blame' 'Steve Borthwick hung his troops out to dry - he should take some blame'
Search