Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

La Chine remporte le Sevens Challenger 2024 féminin

Photo Credit: Julio Martin Seras Lima

La Chine a achevé sa campagne presque parfaite du World Rugby HSBC Sevens Challenger 2024 féminin, en battant la Pologne 36-0 lors de la finale à Cracovie pour remporter une troisième victoire consécutive dans le tournoi dimanche 19 mai.

ADVERTISEMENT

Les Chinoises ont assuré leur place dans le tournoi de barrage HSBC SVNS en se qualifiant pour les quarts de finale à la fin de la première journée, et elles seront accompagnées à Madrid par l’Argentine, la Belgique et la Pologne.

Une finale difficile pour la Pologne

La Chine n’avait perdu qu’un seul de ses 17 matchs à Dubaï, Montevideo et Cracovie avant la finale et, après trois premières minutes difficiles, Dou Xinrong a marqué le premier essai de la finale, profitant de l’expulsion de Hanna Maliszewski.

Maliszewski a reçu son premier carton jaune pour un en-avant volontaire, mais pendant une fraction de seconde, il a semblé qu’elle avait tenté une interception qui aurait sans aucun doute abouti à un essai.

Au lieu de cela, la Pologne a cédé et Su Qi a porté l’avance chinoise à 12-0 dans les derniers instants de la première période. Cette intervention a semblé briser la confiance des Polonaises.

La Chine accélérait à nouveau en inscrivant trois essais en autant de minutes en seconde période – par Dou, Liu Xiaoqian et Gu Yaoyao – avant que Wang Xiao n’ajoute un sixième essai en fin de match.

La défaite de la Pologne s’est aggravée avant la fin du temps réglementaire lorsque Maliszewski a reçu un deuxième carton jaune et le rouge qui en a découlé. Cependant, malgré la défaite finale, la deuxième place a suffi à porter les hôtes à la quatrième place du classement général, ce qui leur permet de se rendre à Madrid dans quinze jours.

L’entraîneur adjoint de la Chine, Rocky Khan, a déclaré : « C’est une sensation extraordinaire. Les filles ont été formidables pendant toute la durée des Series. Même lors des séances d’entraînement à la maison, elles ont fait beaucoup d’efforts. Elles veulent travailler dur et s’améliorer.

ADVERTISEMENT

« Je suis tellement fier de la façon dont elles se sont débrouillées au cours des trois tournois, et même d’arriver ici ce week-end et de remporter les Sevens Challenger, c’est incroyable. Je suis très fier et nous allons profiter de ce moment pour l’instant. »

La Belgique bat le Kenya et décroche le bronze

En raison d’une différence de points nettement inférieure à celle de la Pologne, le Kenya devait remporter la finale de bronze à Cracovie avec un score important pour avoir un espoir de décrocher le dernier billet pour Madrid.

Les Lionesses Sevens avaient ouvert le score dès la première minute grâce à une combinaison qui a permis à Naomi Amuguni de s’engouffrer dans la brèche.

Cependant, la Belgique était déterminée à remporter une deuxième médaille de bronze consécutive et a trouvé le moyen de revenir dans le match lorsque Cécile Blondiau a ouvert le score.

Hanne Swiers a ensuite filé sur l’aile gauche à l’approche de la mi-temps pour donner aux Européennes une avance de 12-7 à la pause.

ADVERTISEMENT

Un avantage qu’elles accentuaient dès le début de la seconde mi-temps, Blondiau aplatissant pour la deuxième fois.

Après un retard causé par les soins apportés à Edith Nariaka, Blondiau a conclu une belle action collective belge en inscrivant son troisième essai. Margaux Stevins a ensuite réussi sa troisième transformation, portant le score final à 26-7.

Cécile Blondiau, de la Belgique, a déclaré : « C’est vraiment excitant d’être qualifiée pour Madrid et nous sommes heureuses de montrer au monde que nous pouvons jouer au rugby et que les filles peuvent aussi jouer en Belgique. Nous sommes très excitées par ce tournoi (Madrid), c’était notre objectif cette année. Je suis très heureuse pour l’équipe et pour le travail que les filles ont fait à la maison et nous sommes impatientes d’entamer le reste de la saison. »

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 1 hour ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

1 Go to comments
J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
J
JW 10 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I had a look at the wiki article again, it's all terribly old data (not that I'd see reason for much change in the case of SA).

Number Of Clubs:

1526

Registered+Unregistered Players:

651146

Number of Referees:

3460

Pre-teen Male Players:

320842

Pre-teen Female Player:

4522

Teen Male Player:

199213

Teen Female Player:

4906

Senior Male Player:

113174

Senior Female Player:

8489

Total Male Player:

633229

Total Female Player:

17917


So looking for something new as were more concerned with adults specifically, so I had a look at their EOY Financial Review.

The total number of clubs remains consistent, with a marginal increase of 1% from 1,161 to 1,167. 8.1.

A comparative analysis of verified data for 2022 and 2023 highlights a marginal decline of 1% in the number of female players, declining from 6,801 to 6,723. Additionally, the total number of players demonstrates an 8% decrease, dropping from 96,172 to 88,828.

So 80k+ adult males (down from 113k), but I'm not really sure when youth are involved with SAn clubs, or if that data is for some reason not being referenced/included. 300k male students however (200k in old wiki data).


https://resources.world.rugby/worldrugby/document/2020/07/28/212ed9cf-cd61-4fa3-b9d4-9f0d5fb61116/P56-57-Participation-Map_v3.pdf has France at 250k registered but https://presse-europe1-fr.translate.goog/exclu-europe-1-le-top-10-des-sports-les-plus-pratiques-en-france-en-2022/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp has them back up at 300k registered.


The French number likely Students + Club, but everyone collects data different I reckon. In that WR pdf for instance a lot of the major nations have a heavily registered setup, were as a nation like England can penetrate into a lot more schools to run camps and include them in the reach of rugby. For instance the SARU release says only 29% of schools are reached by proper rugby programs, where as the 2million English number would be through a much much higer penetration I'd imagine. Which is thanks to schools having the ability to involve themselves in programs more than anything.


In any case, I don't think you need to be concerned with the numbers, whether they are 300 or 88k, there is obviously a big enough following for their pro scenes already to have enough quality players for a 10/12 team competition. They appear ibgger than France but I don't really by the lower English numbers going around.

207 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search