Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

L'Anglaise Sarah Beckett suspendue trois semaines pour sa prise crocodile

L'Anglaise Sarah Beckett manquera les trois prochaines journées du Six-Nations féminin (Photo Morgan Harlow/The RFU Collection via Getty Images).

La troisième ligne centre de l’Angleterre Sarah Beckett manquera les trois prochains tours du Tournoi des Six Nations, à la suite de son expulsion pour son plaquage dangereux sur la centre italienne Michela Sillari, blessée sur l’action et contrainte de quitter le terrain.

ADVERTISEMENT

La N.8 anglaise a écopé dans un premier temps d’un carton jaune, 11 minutes après le début du match de dimanche dernier à Parme, mais sa faute a été transformée en carton rouge cinq minutes plus tard, à la suite d’un examen par le bunker.

Cela n’a pas empêché l’Angleterre de signer un premier succès dans ce Tournoi 2024, marquant la bagatelle de huit essais sans encaisser un seul point (48-0).

Synthèse du match

0
Coups de pied de pénalité
0
0
Essais
8
0
Transformations
4
0
Drops
0
104
Courses avec ballon
129
1
Franchissements
7
22
Turnovers perdus
21
6
Turnovers gagnés
6

Les Six-Nations ont publié un communiqué pour exprimer sa décision.

« Sarah Beckett, numéro 8 de l’équipe d’Angleterre, a comparu devant une commission disciplinaire indépendante par liaison vidéo après avoir reçu un carton rouge pour un acte de jeu déloyal contraire à la règle 9.20 (d) lors du match entre l’Italie et l’Angleterre le 24 mars.

« La commission disciplinaire indépendante était composée de Juan Pablo Spirandelli (président, Argentine), Jamie Corsi (pays de Galles) et Bogdan Zebega (Roumanie). La joueuse a reconnu qu’elle avait commis un acte de jeu déloyal mais a considéré que cela ne méritait pas un carton rouge.

« Toutefois, la Commission de discipline, après avoir examiné toutes les preuves disponibles et les observations de la joueuse et de ses représentants, a confirmé la décision d’infliger un carton rouge.

« En ce qui concerne la sanction, en appliquant les dispositions obligatoires de World Rugby en matière de sanctions, la commission disciplinaire a déterminé que l’incident justifiait un point d’entrée moyen de six semaines de suspension.

ADVERTISEMENT

« Des facteurs atténuants (remords de la joueuse, bonne moralité et comportement exemplaire lors de l’audience) ont été appliqués, réduisant le point d’entrée de six semaines de 50 %, soit trois semaines. »

Par conséquent, Sarah Beckett manquera les trois matchs suivants :

  • Angleterre – Pays de Galles (30 mars)
  • Écosse – Angleterre (13 avril)
  • Angleterre – Irlande (20 avril)

Womens Six Nations

P
W
L
D
PF
PA
PD
BP T
BP-7
BP
Total
1
England Womens
1
1
0
0
5
2
France Womens
1
1
0
0
5
3
Scotland Womens
1
1
0
0
4
4
Wales Womens
1
0
1
0
1
5
Ireland Womens
1
0
1
0
0
6
Italy Womens
1
0
1
0
0
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search