Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Laporte Sticks With Novès... For Now

Guy Noves

Rumours of Guy Novès demise as coach of France may have been premature, but now he and new FFR president Bernard Laporte must find a way to work together – and fast, writes James Harrington.

ADVERTISEMENT

France coach Guy Novès does not like anyone to question his authority in matters of rugby.

That much was obvious when he was in charge at Toulouse – a team he guided to nine domestic titles and four European crowns. It has been equally true at the national team’s headquarters in France, Marcoussis, where he is busy plotting the next phase of Les Bleus’ run to the 2019 World Cup – the 2017 Six Nations and a brutal, bruising summer tour of South Africa.

For a while, it seemed there was a problem. It came in the shape of his new boss, Bernard Laporte, recently elected president of the Fédération Française de Rugby (FFR). Reports in one French sports newspaper sent the rumour mill into overdrive about the coach’s future.

Despite signing a contract through to the 2019 World Cup in Japan, it looked for a while that Novès future as France coach was going to be very short. According to reports, if a meeting on Monday with Serge Simon, Laporte’s enforcer at Marcoussis, did not go well, there may have been a new coach in place for the Six Nations.

Laporte had even reportedly spoken to former Montpellier coach Fabien Galthié about taking over. And Galthié had been due to meet Toulon coach Mourad Boudjellal over ‘a future collaboration’, but cancelled to keep his options open in case the big chair at Marcoussis suddenly becomes available, Midi Olympique reported.

For now, there is no vacancy.

[rugbypass-ad-banner id=”1473723660″]

In a video posted on his Facebook page on Monday evening, Simon said the meeting had ‘gone very well’, and signed off with the news that the ‘future of the bleu-blanc-rouge looks rosy’.

ADVERTISEMENT

Shortly after his election, Laporte had announced that he wanted Novès to stay, so the ball was in the camp of the coach – and he was obviously convinced to stay by Laporte’s right-hand man.

But the president wants results. After the November internationals, he said: “We cannot be satisfied with two defeats at home. I will not be the President who is satisfied with this.”

By that measure, Novès’ first year in charge has been nothing to write home about – fifth in the 2016 Six Nations with two wins from five games; a drawn two-match Test series in Argentina in the summer; and one win from November internationals against Samoa, Australia and New Zealand.

What has delighted fans and pundits was the change in attitude of the French team on his watch. Gone was the stultifying, leaden-footed fear of failure that marked the Lievremont and Saint-Andre years. In three matches in November alone, Les Bleus showed more daring and adventure than in the past decade.

ADVERTISEMENT

It is off the pitch where the big changes have taken place – dragging power to the office of the national side’s head coach. Among other things, players in pre-selected elite and development squads have domestic game time and training monitored, and the coach has unfettered access to selected players during the international window. He has also cut the team’s media commitments to the bone … which does not sit well with that dedicated follower of cameras, Laporte.

At first, there was no doubt that Novès was the big boss at Marcoussis. That was how he liked it. But Monsieur le President also likes people to know who’s in charge, as long as it is him. The pair have a history of clashes dating back to when Laporte was France coach and Noves was at Toulouse. Relations have since been, at best, frosty,  and shortly before the presidential election, the latter voiced his support for the incumbent in the president’s chair, Pierre Camou. Reportedly, the pair have not met since Laporte took over at the helm of the FFR, despite the fact they both have offices in the same building.

This time, at least, the calendar was on Novès’ side. A month-and-a-half before a major international tournament is no time to jettison a coach, particularly one who has started to win over the hearts and minds of many French fans with strong hints of a return to adventurous rugby.

But Laporte’s insistance on results means Novès honeymoon is over. An ugly win will be preferable to a brave, beautiful defeat. Anything less than four wins at the Six Nations – both home matches against Wales and Scotland, and two wins from the away matches in Rome, London and Dublin may mean the end is nigh.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search