Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Late drama in World Rugby election countdown as two nations set to ditch Bill Beaumont - report

(Photo by Mike Hewitt/Getty Images)

Incumbent World Rugby chairman Bill Beaumont could reportedly be faced with a late dilemma on the eve of the elections for the organisation’s top role.

ADVERTISEMENT

A Daily Mail report suggests that Beaumont’s electoral campaign may unravel as both Ireland and Wales – two countries thought to have backed the ex-England captain’s campaign – consider throwing their support behind opposition frontrunner Agustin Pichot.

Sportsmail reported earlier this week that there was a chance that one of the Six Nations unions would vote for Pichot and now it is understood that both the Irish and Welsh are considering the option of aligning with counterparts in the Southern Hemisphere by supporting the Argentine,” said the report.

Video Spacer

The Rugby Pod Quarantine Quiz

Video Spacer

The Rugby Pod Quarantine Quiz

A change of heart at the last minute by the two Six Nations unions would come as a significant blow for Beaumont, who is understood to be in an extremely tight race with the former Argentina captain to be reinstated as World Rugby chairman.

The ex-British and Irish Lions representative is running alongside former France coach Bernard Laporte and was initially believed to have had the backing of the major European nations, while Pichot was supported by the SANZAAR unions.

Ireland and Wales both have three votes to cast in next week’s election, making them highly-valued assets for Pichot if either or both nations were to make a late switch of allegiance.

The paper reports that Ireland’s failed 2023 World Cup bid could be the decisive factor in their decision to jump ship after Beaumont’s vice-chairman hopeful Laporte secured the tournament’s hosting rights for France with some 11th-hour wheeling-and-dealing.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Wales Rugby Union, on the other hand, are reported to be “very principled” and could switch their votes purely on the basis that they believe Pichot has a brighter vision for the future of the game.

It would still come as a surprise, though, to see either Ireland or Wales vote in favour of Pichot given the former 71-test international’s desire to “democratise” the game, which could see European unions lose some of their all-conquering power.

Beaumont is said to be leaning on the support of his former British and Irish Lions teammates to help maintain the support of Ireland and Wales, but the Daily Mail reports that the involvement of Fijian official Francis Kean, a convicted killer, may have “started to harm” the Englishman’s campaign.

Despite being nominated by the Fijian Rugby Union for a role on World Rugby’s executive committee – a nomination that was seconded by Laporte – Kean was forced to stand down amid fresh allegations of reported homophobia.

All 51 votes, to be held in a secret ballot, must be cast by Thursday, and the results will be released on May 12.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

Yep, no one knows what will happen. Thing is I think (this is me arguing a point here not a random debate with this one) they're better off trialing it now in a controlled environment than waiting to open it up in a knee jerk style reaction to a crumbling organtization and team. They can always stop it again.


The principle idea is that why would players leave just because the door is ajar?


BBBR decides to go but is not good enough to retain the jersey after doing it. NZ no longer need to do what I suggest by paying him to get back upto speed. That is solely a concept of a body that needs to do what I call pick and stick wth players. NZR can't hold onto everyone so they have to choose their BBBRs and if that player comes back from a sabbatical under par it's a priority to get him upto speed as fast as possible because half of his competition has been let go overseas because they can't hold onto them all. Changing eligibility removes that dilemma, if a BBBR isn't playing well you can be assured that someone else is (well the idea is that you can be more assured than if you only selected from domestic players).


So if someone decides they want to go overseas, they better do it with an org than is going to help improve them, otherwise theyre still basically as ineligible as if they would have been scorning a NZ Super side that would have given them the best chance to be an All Black.

147 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Bristol Bears announce raft of re-signings Bristol Bears announce raft of re-signings
Search