Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Latest TV numbers illustrate Super Rugby's shocking decline in Australia

Waratahs’ Jed Holloway

Rugby union is continuing to struggle for viewership numbers against rival football codes in Australia despite an increase in Super Rugby viewers, according to latest TV figures.

ADVERTISEMENT

The most recent Oztam ratings, obtained by Fairfax, show that Australian Super Rugby viewership figures trail behind football’s A-League and pale in comparison to rugby league’s NRL and Australian football’s AFL, providing further reasoning for broadcasters to push for change in the next broadcast cycle.

The figures, as reported by the Sydney Morning Herald, show that Super Rugby matches had an average audience of 71,000 in Australia, a nine per cent uplift from the 2017 season.

That in itself is a promising statistic, and it illustrates the improvements made by Australian franchises in that timeframe.

All five sides in the competition at the time struggled immensely against the New Zealand teams and the Lions, which culminated in the controversial culling of the Western Force.

Since then, the Waratahs and Rebels have made vast improvements results-wise, while the Brumbies remain play-off contenders.

However, further Oztam ratings show that figure plummeted in the metropolitan cities, attracting a pay audience of just 50,000 viewers, leaving Super Rugby just behind the A-League’s 51,000, and well astray from the NRL’s 164,000 and the AFL’s 167,000.

ADVERTISEMENT

As for free-to-air television, the NRL and AFL both had audiences in excess of 300,000 per match, while the A-League attracted an average figure of 50,000 via it’s one match per week on Channel 10.

Super Rugby’s numbers were further depleted when the competition’s overseas matches in New Zealand, South Africa, Argentina and Japan were factored in, attracting a measly 23,000 viewers per match.

These concerning figures for a competition once considered the crown jewel of Fox Sports will undoubtedly trouble Rugby Australia administrators as they enter negotiations for a new Super Rugby broadcast deal from 2021 onwards.

Such numbers also provides a compelling case for Rugby Australia officials to throw their support behind World Rugby’s proposed League of Nations concept, whereby the world’s governing body would sell rights to broadcast a global test-level competition for more than any international union could negotiate for a one-off test or test series.

ADVERTISEMENT

Leaders from tier one nations and World Rugby officials met in Los Angeles last month to discuss the prospect of this competition, and World Rugby’s next scheduled meeting next month is expected to generate an initial concept and broadcast estimates for the involved nations.

Australian sources have confirmed an English news report stating that such a deal could see $18 million worth of revenue fill each country’s coffers each year, exponentially more than what Rugby Australia could muster with provincial and domestic competitions, such as Super Rugby.

There are still creases that need to be ironed out before the competition can come to fruition, though, with concerns that an annual global tournament could dilute the quality and integrity of the quadrennial World Cup tournament.

Other concerns include what percentage of the revenue World Rugby would keep for themselves, given they are the organisation brokering the talks.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
Nickers 19 minutes ago
Scott Robertson responds to criticism over All Blacks' handling errors

I thought we made a lot of progress against that type of defence by the WC last year. Lots of direct running and punching holes rather than using width. Against that type of defence I think you have to be looking to kick on first phase when you have front foot ball which we did relatively successfully. We are playing a lot of rugby behind the gain line at the moment. They are looking for those little interchanges for soft shoulders and fast ball or off loads but it regularly turns into them battering away with slow ball and going backwards, then putting in a very rushed kick under huge pressure.


JB brought that dimension when he first moved into 12 a couple of years ago but he's definitely not been at his best this year. I don't know if it is because he is being asked to play a narrow role, or carrying a niggle or two, but he does not look confident to me. He had that clean break on the weekend and stood there like he was a prop who found himself in open space and didn't know what to do with the ball. He is still a good first phase ball carrier though, they use him a lot off the line out to set up fast clean ball, but I don't think anyone is particularly clear on what they are supposed to do at that point. He was used really successfully as a second playmaker last year but I don't think he's been at that role once this year. He is a triple threat player but playing a very 1 dimensional role at the moment. He and Reiko have been absolutely rock solid on defence which is why I don't think there will be too much experimentation or changes there.

41 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Mick Cleary: 'Borthwick needs to have faith in Marcus Smith' Mick Cleary: 'Borthwick needs to have faith in Marcus Smith'
Search