Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Listened to our fans': Law variations confirmed for Super Rugby Pacific

By Finn Morton
(Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

Ahead of the new season, Super Rugby Pacific have confirmed some new law innovations that aim to make the competition the “fastest professional” league “in the world.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Super Rugby Pacific is set to get underway in just under two weeks’ time, with a New Zealand derby blockbuster between the champion Crusaders and Chiefs getting things underway.

But the competition will look a bit different this season, with a number of law variations having been announced on Tuesday.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The rugby lawbook is set for a radical shakeup with the pace of the game set to be prioritised and enforced like never before.

Among the new law variations, time limits will be enforced for shots at goal, lineouts, scrums and rucks.

“We want Super Rugby Pacific to be the most entertaining, innovative and fastest professional rugby competition in the world,” Tournament Director Matt Barlow said in a statement.

“We’ve listened to our fans and taken steps to reduce stoppages and video replays, increase flow and maintain the integrity of the competition and the safety of players in regard to yellow and red cards.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Players, coaches and referees are excited about these innovations, and we believe they will create a better fan experience both at game and for those watching on television.”

The TMO will have less of a say this season, as they’ll be allowed to “interrupt” play whenever serious, clear and obvious incidents of foul play are missed by the on-field referees.

Referees will also be able to call on the TMO when reviewing a potential yellow card decision.


The decision to award a yellow card can also be reviewed by the TMO for up to eight-minutes, which may see the sanction upgraded to a 20-minute red card.

ADVERTISEMENT

But that’s not. In fact, the final law change is probably the most radical of them all.

While the rugby world has become quite used to 20-minute red cards over the past few seasons, players can receive a “full red card” once again.

In instances of deliberate foul play, players can be sent from the field, and will not be able to be placed after 20-minutes.

“The review process for dangerous play will be as vigorous as ever and we believe TMOs will be able to make better judgements about the seriousness of foul play offences without the pressure of having to watch replays under stressful time constraints,” he added.

“There is also the addition of a stronger deterrent for deliberate foul play with the referee having the option of issuing a full red card.

“We know players and fans don’t want to watch multiple frame-by-frame replays while they wait for the match to resume, so we believe we’ve struck the right balance.

“TMOs will still be reviewing the two phases before a try is scored and can still be called upon by the referee to check things like the ball being grounded when a try has been scored.

“The difference will be the Match Official Team will lead the process and viewers will not see as many replays.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
i
isaac 583 days ago

Just make the refs fair....dont want a repeat of the Drau vs Reds match which was decided by the ref. .

i
isaac 584 days ago

Hopefully the full red card syndrome is fair and not only applicable to moana and Drua.....who gets to decide a full or half red card? When players are always in refs ears such as Aaron smith, TJ, BB and others.....refs should also be strict on professional fouls especially by players such as Dan Coles, and the likes

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
‘Did Conrad really score that many’: Rieko Ioane dismisses All Blacks drought

Indeed, but I also appreciate how Razor now has him covering the backfield more. Are they conflicting uses? Who was it that covered the Arg game, John(?), no it was a YTer (squidge?) suggested Jordies role was to chase and support the wing for a tap back.


That turnover try was actually a great example of were Jordies boot could have been used for territory instead of attacking (contestable). Hansen talking again about 'learnings' about what part of the field they want to play in. I would have thought that would be a basic principle about how the coaches want to play and it would be a bit late now to be learning that.


Nevrtheless we wait and see. One Barretts carrying though I'd suggest he only has a mandate to bring some physicality, not in how he does it. You can see how out of kilter he gets when he tries to do anything other than a simple cart up and pop. Just look at least week when he had two players on the outside to hit in multiple ways and he just indecisively takes the tackle before giving a poor overhead pop. That he still got the pass away hints at what he is "capable of" but as you saw, with free license, its just far off the mark. I've decided Rieko is my 12 from now on. I'd like Jordie to remain primarly at 12 at the Hurricans, as I feel that's were his best alround game can be kept in good shape, and you never know perhaps he will fill into the position after a while, but I'd like to try other centers essentially. But yes, if Razor/Hansen can get both him and Dmac humming in partnership they could also essentially cover many of the fb roles which aren't Jordans strength. Also obv happy to see Rieko tried on the wing just now I think that's more likely to fail than a Rieko/Proctor midfield.

16 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Taine Basham: ‘I want the Wales No. 7 jersey back on my back’ Taine Basham: ‘I want the Wales No. 7 jersey back on my back’
Search