Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

Le retour des vétérans All Blacks pour jouer la France

Ardie Savea (Nouvelle-Zélande) pendant le match des Autumn Nations Series 2024 entre l'Angleterre et les All Blacks de Nouvelle-Zélande à l'Allianz Stadium le 2 novembre 2024 à Londres, en Angleterre. (Photo par Craig Mercer/MB Media/Getty Images)

Les All Blacks ont annoncé leur équipe pour affronter la France, avec le retour des vétérans Codie Taylor et Beauden Barrett, absents lors du test contre l’Irlande en raison d’un protocole de retour au jeu.

ADVERTISEMENT

Les deux joueurs reprennent leurs postes de titulaire, respectivement au talonnage et à l’ouverture, tandis qu’Asafo Aumua et Damian McKenzie seront sur le banc.

Rencontre
Internationals
France
30 - 29
Temps complet
New Zealand
Toutes les stats et les données

Le sélectionneur Scott Robertson a également procédé à un remaniement de la troisième-ligne en raison de la blessure de Sam Cane.

Ardie Savea sera titularisé en numéro 7 pour la première fois de l’année, Wallace Sititi passera en numéro 8, et Samipeni Finau sera aligné en troisième-ligne côté fermé. Peter Lakai, joueur des Hurricanes, sera remplaçant en troisième-ligne.

Related

Autre changement notable, le demi de mêlée Cam Roigard débutera pour la première fois cette année avec le maillot de numéro 9, aux côtés de Beauden Barrett à la charnière. Cortez Ratima est également inclus dans l’équipe en tant que finisseur.

Sevu Reece fait son retour dans l’équipe pour remplacer Mark Tele’a, qui est forfait en raison d’une blessure à la main.

ADVERTISEMENT

« C’était important d’être ici à Paris pour le jour de l’Armistice », a déclaré Robertson.

« Nous avons honoré ces commémorations en tant qu’équipe et avons également reconnu l’importance du trophée Dave Gallaher, nommé d’après l’un de nos plus grands capitaines All Black. Gallaher a dirigé les ‘Originals’ lors du tout premier test contre la France et a tragiquement perdu la vie 11 ans plus tard pendant la Première Guerre mondiale.

« C’est un trophée que nous aspirons à conserver, et les joueurs sont prêts à saisir l’opportunité qui s’offre à eux ce samedi soir à Paris. »

L’équipe des All Blacks (contre la France) :

  1. Tamaiti Williams
  2. Codie Taylor
  3. Tyrel Lomax
  4. Scott Barrett (c)
  5. Tupou Vaa’i
  6. Samipeni Finau
  7. Ardie Savea
  8. Wallace Sititi
  9. Cam Roigard
  10. Beauden Barrett
  11. Caleb Clarke
  12. Jordie Barrett
  13. Rieko Ioane
  14. Sevu Reece
  15. Will Jordan

Remplaçants :

  1. Asafo Aumua
  2. Ofa Tu’ungafasi
  3. Pasilio Tosi
  4. Patrick Tuipulotu
  5. Peter Lakai
  6. Cortez Ratima
  7. Anton Lienert-Brown
  8. Damian McKenzie

Cet article a été publié initialement sur RugbyPass.com et adapté en français par Willy Billiard.

Visionnez l'épisode exclusif de "Walk the Talk" où Ardie Savea discute avec Jim Hamilton de son expérience à la Coupe du Monde de Rugby 2023, de sa vie au Japon, de son parcours avec les All Blacks et de ses perspectives d'avenir. Regardez-le gratuitement dès maintenant sur RugbyPass TV.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Like I've said before about your idea (actually it might have been something to do with mine, I can't remember), I like that teams will a small sustainable league focus can gain the reward of more consistent CC involvement. I'd really like the most consistent option available.


Thing is, I think rugby can do better than footballs version. I think for instance I wanted everyone in it to think they can win it, where you're talking about trying to make so the worst teams in it are not giving up when they are so far off the pace that we get really bad scorelines (when that and giving up to concentrate on the league is happening together). I know it's not realistic to think those same exact teams are going to be competitive with a different model but I am inclined to think more competitive teams make it in with another modem. It's a catch 22 of course, you want teams to fight to be there next year, but they don't want to be there next year when theres less interest in it because the results are less interesting than league ones. If you ensure the best 20 possible make it somehow (say currently) each year they quickly change focus when things aren't going well enough and again interest dies. Will you're approach gradually work overtime? With the approach of the French league were a top 6 mega rich Premier League type club system might develop, maybe it will? But what of a model like Englands were its fairly competitive top 8 but orders or performances can jump around quite easily one year to the next? If the England sides are strong comparatively to the rest do they still remain in EPCR despite not consistently dominating in their own league?


So I really like that you could have a way to remedy that, but personally I would want my model to not need that crutch. Some of this is the same problem that football has. I really like the landscape in both the URC and Prem, but Ireland with Leinster specifically, and France, are a problem IMO. In football this has turned CL pool stages in to simply cash cow fixtures for the also ran countries teams who just want to have a Real Madrid or ManC to lose to in their pool for that bumper revenue hit. It's always been a comp that had suffered for real interest until the knockouts as well (they might have changed it in recent years?).


You've got some great principles but I'm not sure it's going to deliver on that hard hitting impact right from the start without the best teams playing in it. I think you might need to think about the most minimal requirement/way/performance, a team needs to execute to stay in the Champions Cup as I was having some thougt about that earlier and had some theory I can't remember. First they could get entry by being a losing quarter finalist in the challenge, then putting all their eggs in the Champions pool play bucket in order to never finish last in their pool, all the while showing the same indifference to their league some show to EPCR rugby now, just to remain in champions. You extrapolate that out and is there ever likely to be more change to the champions cup that the bottom four sides rotate out each year for the 4 challenge teams? Are the leagues ever likely to have the sort of 'flux' required to see some variation? Even a good one like Englands.


I'd love to have a table at hand were you can see all the outcomes, and know how likely any of your top 12 teams are going break into Champions rubyg on th back it it are?

120 Go to comments
f
fl 4 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Right, so even if they were the 4 worst teams in Champions Cup, you'd still have them back by default?"

I think (i) this would literally never happen, (ii) it technically couldn't quite happen, given at least 1 team would qualify via the challenge cup, so if the actual worst team in the CC qualified it would have to be because they did really well after being knocked down to the challenge cup.

But the 13th-15th teams could qualify and to be fair I didn't think about this as a possibility. I don't think a team should be able to qualify via the Champions Cup if they finish last in their group.


Overall though I like my idea best because my thinking is, each league should get a few qualification spots, and then the rest of the spots should go to the next best teams who have proven an ability to be competitive in the champions cup. The elite French clubs generally make up the bulk of the semi-final spots, but that doesn't (necessarily) mean that the 5th-8th best French clubs would be competitive in a slimmed down champions cup. The CC is always going to be really great competition from the semis onwards, but the issue is that there are some pretty poor showings in the earlier rounds. Reducing the number of teams would help a little bit, but we could improve things further by (i) ensuring that the on-paper "worst" teams in the competition have a track record of performing well in the CC, and (ii) by incentivising teams to prioritise the competition. Teams that have a chance to win the whole thing will always be incentivised to do that, but my system would incentivise teams with no chance of making the final to at least try to win a few group stage matches.


"I'm afraid to say"

Its christmas time; there's no need to be afraid!

120 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Barrett and Prendergast put Leinster European rivals on notice Barrett and Prendergast put Leinster European rivals on notice
Search