Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Leicester Tigers player ratings vs Sharks | Investec Champions Cup

Solomone Kata of Leicester Tigers runs in to score his team's fourth try during the Investec Champions Cup match between Leicester Tigers and Hollywoodbets Sharks at Mattioli Woods Welford Road Stadium on December 14, 2024 in Leicester, England. (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Leicester Tigers player ratings: Michael Cheika’s side put on a clinic at Mattioli Woods Welford Road, dismantling the Hollywoodbets Sharks 56-17 in a display that combined power and precision.

ADVERTISEMENT

Here’s how the Tigers rated:

15. Freddie Steward – 7
Patrolled the backfield with his usual composure, but the Sharks’ bite was more gummy than ferocious, leaving Steward with little to sink his teeth into.

14. Josh Bassett – 7
Worked hard off the ball and kept the Sharks honest on the edge. While he didn’t get over the line, he played his part in a well-oiled backline performance.

Video Spacer

Schalk Burger on Siya Kolisi’s move to No.8 | RPTV

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:28
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 0:28
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
    • en (Main), selected
    Video Spacer

    Schalk Burger on Siya Kolisi’s move to No.8 | RPTV

    Schalk Burger discusses the way Bok captain Siya Kolisi has played at the back of the scrum. Watch the full Boks Office episode on RugbyPass TV now

    Watch now

    13. Izaia Perese – NA
    The Wallaby bruiser was taken off at 18 minutes of action with a shoulder injury.

    Fixture
    Investec Champions Cup
    Leicester
    56 - 17
    Full-time
    Sharks
    All Stats and Data

    12. Solomone Kata – 9
    A try to remember for Kata, who brushed off South African defenders like crumbs from a tablecloth. His fend and acceleration were as effective as they were entertaining.

    11. Ollie Hassell-Collins – 8
    Right place, right time for his opportunistic try, but it was a moment of heads-up brilliance. Worked tirelessly off his wing to create options in attack.

    10. Handré Pollard – 8
    A masterclass from the Springbok, dictating the tempo and finishing with a try and six conversions. The Sharks were as helpless as Pollard was clinical.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    9. Jack van Poortvliet – 8
    A sharp, energetic performance from the scrum-half, capped with a well-taken try. His quick thinking and slick passing kept the Sharks on their heels all evening, even if his tackling was a bit loose at times.

    Attack

    153
    Passes
    143
    123
    Ball Carries
    99
    292m
    Post Contact Metres
    235m
    7
    Line Breaks
    4

    1. Nicky Smith – 7
    Did the hard yards in the scrum and around the park. A solid shift from the Welshman as part of a dominant pack.

    2. Julián Montoya – 8.5
    Two tries from the maestro of the maul and a captain’s performance that oozed leadership. The Sharks had no answer to his hooker’s instinct and Argentine steel.

    3. Joe Heyes – 7.5
    Gave Sharks loosehead Ntuthuko Mchunu a torrid time and contributed in the loose. Another steady day at the office for the ever-reliable tighthead.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    4. Harry Wells – 7
    The engine room grafter, Wells tackled and carried like his contract depended on it. A typically hardworking display.

    5. George Martin – 8
    Big physical presence and key to Leicester’s dominance up front. His offload in the build-up to Pollard’s try was pure class.

    6. Hanro Liebenberg – 7
    Worked tirelessly in the tight exchanges, hitting rucks and making tackles with unrelenting energy. Played his part in setting the tone.

    7. Tommy Reffell – 7
    Another tireless defensive display from Reffell, the Welshman hunting turnovers like a truffle pig.

    8. Olly Cracknell – 7.5
    Carried hard and often, softening up the Sharks’ defence. A typically abrasive performance from the No.8, who showed soft hands for Pollard’s try.

    Replacements:

    16. Charlie Clare – 8
    Made a big impact off the bench, crashing over for a try and keeping the set piece steady. Proof that Leicester’s depth is as robust as a French wine cellar.

    17. James Whitcombe – 7
    Carried with intent and held his own in the scrum. A solid shift.

    18. Dan Cole – 7
    Came on to close out the game and brought all the experience and guile you’d expect from the veteran prop.

    19. Cameron Henderson – 7
    Made his presence felt in the tight and loose. A dependable outing from the lock.

    20. Emeka Ilione – 8
    Added energy and impact, capping his cameo with a try that showcased his brute power.

    21. Ben Youngs – 7
    Came on to add control and steer the ship home. Calm and composed as ever.

    22. Jamie Shillcock – 7
    Added two conversions with ease and kept the backline humming in the final stages.

    23. Joseph Woodward – 7
    Thrown into the action early after Perese’s injury and took his chance with both hands. Showed maturity beyond his years, combining solid defence with smart attacking lines.

    Related

     


    To be first in line for Rugby World Cup 2027 Australia tickets, register your interest here 

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Boks Office | Episode 37 | Six Nations Round 4 Review

    Cape Town | Leg 2 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series 2025 | Full Day Replay

    Gloucester-Hartpury vs Bristol Bears | PWR 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

    Boks Office | Episode 36 | Six Nations Round 3 Review

    Why did Scotland's Finn Russell take the crucial kick from the wrong place? | Whistle Watch

    England A vs Ireland A | Full Match Replay

    Kubota Spears vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | JRLO 2024/2025 | Full Match Replay

    Watch now: Lomu - The Lost Tapes

    Trending on RugbyPass

    Comments

    0 Comments
    Be the first to comment...

    Join free and tell us what you really think!

    Sign up for free
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Latest Features

    Comments on RugbyPass

    C
    Carmen Beechum 1 hour ago
    Mick Cleary: 'England are back among the heavyweights.'

    (Telegram: https:// t. me/Pro_ Wizard_ Gilbert_ Recovery)Email (pro wizard gilbert recovery (@) engineer. com)I never imagined I would fall victim to a cryptocurrency scam, but that's exactly what happened. My name is [Carmen Beechum, and I invested $500,000 into what | believed was a legitimate trading platform. Everything appeared professional-the website was well-designed, customer service was responsive, and my trading account even showed promising returns.It all seemed too good to be false.However, when I attempted to withdraw my funds, I was met with endless delays and excuses. First, they claimed there were technical issues, then they needed additional verification, and finally, they requested a release fee before processing my withdrawal. Despite complying with their demands, my account was eventually frozen, and all communication from the platform ceased. That's when reality hit me—l had been scammed out of half a million dollars. Desperate to find a way to recover my money, I searched online for solutions. That's when I came across PRO WIZARD GIlBERT RECOVERY, a company dedicated to helping victims of online financial fraud. At first, I was skeptical-after all, I had already been deceived once, and the last thing I wanted was to fall for another scam. But after speaking with their team and reviewing their success stories, I decided to take a chance.Their experts immediately got to work, using advanced blockchain forensics and investigative tools to trace my stolen funds. WhatsApp: +1 (920) 408‑1234They identified the fraudulent wallets where my money had been transferred and collaborated with financial institutions and law enforcement agencies to take action. Thanks to their persistence and expertise, they were able to freeze the scammers' accounts and successfully recover my $500,000. What seemed like a devastating loss turned into a remarkable recovery. I am incredibly grateful to PRO WIZARD GIlBERT RECOVERY for not only retrieving my funds but also restoring my peace of mind. My experience serves as a warning to others-always be cautious with online investments, but if you ever become a victim, know that recovery is possible with the right experts on your side.

    15 Go to comments
    J
    JW 1 hour ago
    Five reasons why Super Rugby Pacific is enjoying it's best season in forever

    The Mickey Mouse playoff system that made the entire regular season redundant

    The playoff system has never been redundant Ben, it was merely important to fewer teams, just those vying for top seed. After that it was simply about qualifying.


    The format is arguably worse now. I can see the Canes slumping to a point were the return of key components, like their starting midfield, is now going to happen too late for them due to the reduced playoff spots. So we don’t get the perfect jeopardy like what we got with the Crusaders last year, were deservedly (despite showing they easily had a top 4 team when fit) they missed out because they were even more pathetic than that early team deserved. A couple more bonus points with some better leadership, on and off field, would have given the Crusaders a deserving. As reported last year have we not seen a more perfect finals run in.


    Objectively easier finals qualification is better suited to shorter competitions, and we know SR is the “sprint” version amongst it’s rugby equivalents. The Top 14 is probably the worst competition in this respect, with it’s length with a double round robin should have a football styled champion. The Premiership, with it’s smaller base but also double round robin, was pretty much perfectly suited to it’s smaller 4 team playoff. Super Rugby, with it’s much shorter season (smaller amount of games, and most importantly over a much shorter period, would be able suited to a 6 team play off series if it had a comparative round robin. It doesn’t. Playing a bunch of random extra games, within your own division, requires you to expand the qualification reach. Super Rugby was another perfectly balanced competition.


    If you want to look subjectively, sure, there are a lot of cool facets of tighter qualification, they just aren’t sensible applicable to SR so you have to be a realist.


    I’m pretty sure you yourself have authored articles showing you need to be in the top four come finals time to win Super Rugby.

    Competition parity this year just seems to be part luck, but we’ll take it.

    The closer parity is simply more about circumstance, I agree. The Lions tour has just as much to do with the consistency and early standards in Australian players performances, and random factors balancing the NZ sides. The predictable improvement of the “Pacific Powers” another key factor, but with the case of extra support like NZR help raise their profile, as in the “Ardie” factor, possibly able to happen a year sooner than it has.


    Still, as I have highlighted on previous articles, I wouldn’t be surprised if these results were nearly as predictable as they were last year, and that it was just the fixture ‘creation’ by new management that has artificially created a bit more hype and unrealistic perception on the competitions ‘parity’, in these early stages.

    Super Rugby Pacific has done the right thing and got rid of most TMO interventions that have plagued the game over the last few years and impacted one World Cup final.

    I wouldn’t have minded if they just put their own spin on WR’s structure. While you don’t go on to describe what the two situations are that remain, one that I think could still have been of value keeping is for the ability for the TMO to rule live.


    The fact that several of the WC’s TMO officials were overly zealous in their ability to over rule the onfield decision does not mean there wouldn’t have been value in a good southern hemisphere run contingent from simply adding value and support to the game ref. Take the case last weekend as the perfect example. While I don’t believe it would have been of any real benefit for the Highlanders to have had advantage at the death (the same sequence would have still played out), looking in isolation one can clearly tell that was a live situation where the ref said he was obstructed from making a call, and if the current rules would have allowed, the TMO, like us on TV, could easily have told him to play advantage for the infringement. In another situation that type of officiating could have made all the difference to the quality and accuracy of the outcome. Views of the comp would be a lot different if it was clearly as case that the Highlanders were robbed of a deserved victory.


    All told, the game is obviously much better off for what changes have been made with officiating, though this is not really isolated to SR. SR is just the only comp to have start with these.

    If you want back in, put your hands up for some real competition, don’t ask for handouts. No conference systems.

    We are currently in a conference system Ben, I’m afraid you’re beating the wrong drum there and you own subjective (and flawed) opinions are coming through quite clearly. As spitballed on the article a few days ago, it’s hard to see a true league table where it is either a full round robin or double round robin happen, there is still going to be some amount of divisional derby matchs going on to fill out the season.


    Conferences are also the only way forward, so get on board. I would love for SARU to be able to add a couple of regional sides in Super Rugby, using the countries burgeoning playerbase. It might be far easier, and more advantageous, for SA to add to SR than say try to enlarge the URC, or go it on their own with a professional scene. They could leave their clubs to themselves and take control of running a highveld team out of Cheetahs country, and a lowveld team wherever they would like a new attempt at a ‘Kings’ team. I can’t see the clubs ever rejoining SR.


    Not surprised the article is well off the mark Ben.


    One thing they could do to further improve the ‘jeopardy’ though is to have a separate world club table where each seasons finalists are awarding ranking points going towards selecting who takes part in the biennial (right?) world champs the Champions Cup is hosting in the future. I’d normally expect the government to simply send whoever the most recent finalists are but I reckon creating a way to have those instead be judged by contribution since the last edition (however frequent this idea might turn out) could be a winner this new management will work out and capitalize on. It would also help add to that jeopardy if say ranking points were only allocated to the top 6 of an 8 team finals format.

    2 Go to comments
    LONG READ
    LONG READ Steve Meehan: 'If you start winning, it’s amazing what effect it has on all fans.' Steve Meehan: 'If you start winning, it’s amazing what effect it has on all fans.'
    Search