Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The 'Leinster B' controversy and what it means for the PRO14

Leinster's 'B' still managed an away win against the winners of the Champions Cup (Getty Images)

In the week leading up to their PRO14 opener, the Cardiff Blues helped ratchet up excitement for the new campaign by dispatching first-team players to hand deliver season tickets to fans across the region.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Blues’ Twitter feed last Wednesday and Thursday featured a stream of beaming faces, a few awkward poses and a lot of bonhomie as supporters received their prized passes.

What was missing were the ‘after’ shots once those fans had seen the squad Leinster were sending to the Cardiff Arms Park.

In hindsight the tagline used to promote the game ‘Champions Collide’ looks a little hollow. While the hosts included 17 of the 23-man squad that had helped secure Challenge Cup success in May, their visitors travelled with only seven players that had featured in their Champions Cup final win over Racing 92, six who played in the PRO14 title win over the Scarlets.

Video Spacer

But unlike the Scarlets, who were already missing 14 first-team players for their trip to Ulster before Jonathan Davies pulled out in the warm-up, Leinster have not had to contend with an overflowing treatment room.

Sean O’Brien and Dan Leavy do remain long-term absentees, while Johnny Sexton is likely to be kept in cotton wool with a protective layer of bubble wrap in the lead-up to his final Rugby World Cup, but news on the injury front had been positive on the whole.

Garry Ringrose and Josh van der Flier both returned to training last week, but like their team-mates who toured Australia with Ireland this summer they will be kept on the sidelines for the opening few weeks of the PRO14 season.

ADVERTISEMENT

It is hardly an ideal scenario for those trying to market the league at a time when it has signed deals with new broadcast partners at home and abroad.

When selecting Friday night’s match to kick off their coverage of the competition, Premier Sports, for example, would undoubtedly have expected a few more stellar names involved, especially considering Robbie Henshaw, Jordan Larmour, James Ryan et al are all fit.

But while broadcasters and Blues fans might have had reason to grumble, is the approach taken by Leinster and the Irish Rugby Football Union (IRFU) wrong?

ADVERTISEMENT

The 23-man squad that lined up at the Arms Park contained 12 players who had been capped at Test level, and was ultimately good enough to win the match in thrilling fashion. Forget the names who filled the jerseys, no one who watched the match can feel cheated.

Moreover, at a time when concerns over player welfare are ever increasing surely the IRFU is well within its rights to protect those it employs.

Leinster lift the 2018 Champions Cup in Bilbao (Getty Images)

For Leinster fans the uproar that greeted Thursday’s team announcement from sections of social media was strange, they have experienced the benefits of the system in place.

Under the IRFU’s player management programme, which Ireland coach Joe Schmidt has proudly claimed is the envy of the world, frontline Test stars’ involvement with their province in the PRO14 is restricted to a reported 640 minutes a season. Given Leinster’s affinity with the Champions Cup, it can often be less as players regularly play more in Europe than in the league.

Last season, the quartet of Sexton, Tadhg Furlong, James Ryan and Rob Kearney, which started together three times for Ireland during the Six Nations, were named in a Leinster team just once in the PRO14 – the final against Scarlets.

The rewards for Ireland and Leinster of holding back their players in the first few weeks of the season are twofold. Not only do those players arrive at a crucial stage of the season – the Six Nations, PRO14 and Champions Cup play-offs – fresh but their absence creates opportunity for future stars to emerge.

Leinster has the biggest player base of any European club in the PRO14, and since the start of last season alone Larmour, Leavy and Ryan have all excelled when given an opportunity in the absence of a more senior player. On Friday night it was uncapped hooker Bryan Byrne who took his chance, scoring two tries as a replacement.

“A lot of the success, provincially and nationally, has been created by competition for places and that’s come about through being given opportunity, putting pressure on some of the more established players and people vying for selection,” IRFU performance director David Nucifora said. “That’s a great formula for performance.”

The proof of the Leinster-IRFU system is, of course, in the trophy cabinet and while the champions keep winning few at the RDS Arena will complain.

All of which offers no panacea to those attempting to ensure the PRO14 can compete with the Gallagher Premiership and Top 14, and avoid becoming a de facto development league.

The fact that the competition has so many stakeholders, with different funding models and goals in place, means that creating a level playing field will never be straightforward. But until a more competitive structure is found then Leinster and the IRFU will continue to play the system to their advantage.

Which takes us back to the real losers of Friday night, the Blues fans. Home supporters at the Arms Park have not witnessed a victory over Leinster for seven years, and it is doubtful they will get a better opportunity to put that right in the next seven.

There were plenty of positives for John Mulvihill and his team to take from defeat, but having led by 15 points with just 20 minutes to go this was a game the Blues should have seen out.

The hosts, who were missing several key players themselves, did very little wrong but the fact that Leinster’s second-string replacements’ bench had a greater impact on proceedings than their own merely highlights the gulf between these two champion teams.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

H
Hellhound 3 hours ago
Brett Robinson looks forward to 'monumental' year in 2025

I'm not very hopeful of a better change to the sport. Putting an Aussie in charge after they failed for two decades is just disgusting. What else will be brought in to weaken the game? What new rule changes will be made? How will the game be grown?


Nothing of value in this letter. There is no definitive drive towards something better. Just more of the same as usual. The most successful WC team is getting snubbed again and again for WC's hosting rights. What will make other competitions any different?


My beloved rugby is already a global sport. Why is there no SH team chosen between the Boks, AB's, Wallabies and Fiji? Like a B&I Lions team to tour Europe and America? A team that could face not only countries but also the B&I Lions? Wouldn't that make for a great spectacle that will also bring lots of eyeballs to the sport?


Instead with an Aussie in charge, rugby will become more like rugby league. Rugby will most likely become less global if we look at what have become of rugby in Australia. He can't save rugby in Australia, how will he improve the global footprint of rugby world wide?


I hope to be proven wrong and that he will raise up the sport to new heights, but I am very much in doubt. It's like hiring a gardener to a CEO position in a global company expecting great results. It just won't happen. Call me negative or call me whatever you'd like, Robinson is the wrong man for the job.

3 Go to comments
J
JW 3 hours ago
The Fergus Burke test and rugby's free market

The question that pops into my mind with Fergus Burke, and a few other high profile players in his boots right now, and also many from the past to be fair, is can the club scene start to take over this sentimentality of test footy being the highest level? Take for a moment a current, modern day scenario of Toulouse having a hiccup and failing to make this years Top 14 Final, we could end up seeing the strongest French side in History touring New Zealand next year. Why? Because at any one time they could make up over half the French side, but although that is largely avoided, it is very likely at the national teams detriment with the understanding these players have of playing together likely being stronger than the sum of the best players throughout France selected on marginal calls.


Would the pinnacle of the game really not be reached in the very near future by playing for a team like Toulouse? Burke might have put himself in a position where holding down a starting spot for any nation, but he could be putting himself in the hotbed of a new scene. Clearly he is a player that cherishes International footy as the highest level, and is possibly underselling himself, but really he might just be underselling these other nations he thinks he could represent.

Burke’s decision to test the waters with either England or Scotland has been thrown head-first into the spotlight by the relative lack of competition for the New Zealand 10 shirt.

This is the most illogical statement I've ever read in one of your articles Nick. Burke is behind 3 All Stars of All Black rugby, it might be a indictment of New Zealand rugby but it is abosolutely apparent (he might have even said so himself) why he decided to test the waters.

He mattered because he is the kind of first five-eighth New Zealand finds it most difficult to produce from its domestic set-up: the strategic schemer, the man who sees all the angles and all the bigger potential pictures with the detail of a single play.

Was it not one of your own articles that highlighted the recent All Black nature to select a running, direct threat, first five over the last decade? There are plenty of current players of Burke's caliber and style that simply don't fit the in vogue mode of what Dan Carter was in peoples minds, the five eight that ran at the slightest hole and started out as a second five. The interesting thing I find with that statement though is that I think he is firmly keeping his options open for a return to NZ.

A Kiwi product no longer belongs to New Zealand, and that is the way it is. Great credo or greater con it may be, but the free market is here to stay.

A very shortsighted and simplistic way to end a great article. You simply aren't going to find these circumstances in the future. The migration to New Zealand ended in 1975, and as that generation phases out, so too will the majority of these ancestry ties (in a rugby context) will end. It would be more accurate to say that Fergus Burke thought of himself as the last to be able to ride this wave, so why not jump on it? It is dying, and not just in the interests or Scottish of English fans.

47 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Close to perfection: Johann van Graan's favourite game Close to perfection: Johann van Graan's favourite game
Search