Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The 'Leinster B' controversy and what it means for the PRO14

Leinster's 'B' still managed an away win against the winners of the Champions Cup (Getty Images)

In the week leading up to their PRO14 opener, the Cardiff Blues helped ratchet up excitement for the new campaign by dispatching first-team players to hand deliver season tickets to fans across the region.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Blues’ Twitter feed last Wednesday and Thursday featured a stream of beaming faces, a few awkward poses and a lot of bonhomie as supporters received their prized passes.

What was missing were the ‘after’ shots once those fans had seen the squad Leinster were sending to the Cardiff Arms Park.

In hindsight the tagline used to promote the game ‘Champions Collide’ looks a little hollow. While the hosts included 17 of the 23-man squad that had helped secure Challenge Cup success in May, their visitors travelled with only seven players that had featured in their Champions Cup final win over Racing 92, six who played in the PRO14 title win over the Scarlets.

Video Spacer

But unlike the Scarlets, who were already missing 14 first-team players for their trip to Ulster before Jonathan Davies pulled out in the warm-up, Leinster have not had to contend with an overflowing treatment room.

Sean O’Brien and Dan Leavy do remain long-term absentees, while Johnny Sexton is likely to be kept in cotton wool with a protective layer of bubble wrap in the lead-up to his final Rugby World Cup, but news on the injury front had been positive on the whole.

Garry Ringrose and Josh van der Flier both returned to training last week, but like their team-mates who toured Australia with Ireland this summer they will be kept on the sidelines for the opening few weeks of the PRO14 season.

ADVERTISEMENT

It is hardly an ideal scenario for those trying to market the league at a time when it has signed deals with new broadcast partners at home and abroad.

When selecting Friday night’s match to kick off their coverage of the competition, Premier Sports, for example, would undoubtedly have expected a few more stellar names involved, especially considering Robbie Henshaw, Jordan Larmour, James Ryan et al are all fit.

But while broadcasters and Blues fans might have had reason to grumble, is the approach taken by Leinster and the Irish Rugby Football Union (IRFU) wrong?

ADVERTISEMENT

The 23-man squad that lined up at the Arms Park contained 12 players who had been capped at Test level, and was ultimately good enough to win the match in thrilling fashion. Forget the names who filled the jerseys, no one who watched the match can feel cheated.

Moreover, at a time when concerns over player welfare are ever increasing surely the IRFU is well within its rights to protect those it employs.

Leinster lift the 2018 Champions Cup in Bilbao (Getty Images)

For Leinster fans the uproar that greeted Thursday’s team announcement from sections of social media was strange, they have experienced the benefits of the system in place.

Under the IRFU’s player management programme, which Ireland coach Joe Schmidt has proudly claimed is the envy of the world, frontline Test stars’ involvement with their province in the PRO14 is restricted to a reported 640 minutes a season. Given Leinster’s affinity with the Champions Cup, it can often be less as players regularly play more in Europe than in the league.

Last season, the quartet of Sexton, Tadhg Furlong, James Ryan and Rob Kearney, which started together three times for Ireland during the Six Nations, were named in a Leinster team just once in the PRO14 – the final against Scarlets.

The rewards for Ireland and Leinster of holding back their players in the first few weeks of the season are twofold. Not only do those players arrive at a crucial stage of the season – the Six Nations, PRO14 and Champions Cup play-offs – fresh but their absence creates opportunity for future stars to emerge.

Leinster has the biggest player base of any European club in the PRO14, and since the start of last season alone Larmour, Leavy and Ryan have all excelled when given an opportunity in the absence of a more senior player. On Friday night it was uncapped hooker Bryan Byrne who took his chance, scoring two tries as a replacement.

“A lot of the success, provincially and nationally, has been created by competition for places and that’s come about through being given opportunity, putting pressure on some of the more established players and people vying for selection,” IRFU performance director David Nucifora said. “That’s a great formula for performance.”

The proof of the Leinster-IRFU system is, of course, in the trophy cabinet and while the champions keep winning few at the RDS Arena will complain.

All of which offers no panacea to those attempting to ensure the PRO14 can compete with the Gallagher Premiership and Top 14, and avoid becoming a de facto development league.

The fact that the competition has so many stakeholders, with different funding models and goals in place, means that creating a level playing field will never be straightforward. But until a more competitive structure is found then Leinster and the IRFU will continue to play the system to their advantage.

Which takes us back to the real losers of Friday night, the Blues fans. Home supporters at the Arms Park have not witnessed a victory over Leinster for seven years, and it is doubtful they will get a better opportunity to put that right in the next seven.

There were plenty of positives for John Mulvihill and his team to take from defeat, but having led by 15 points with just 20 minutes to go this was a game the Blues should have seen out.

The hosts, who were missing several key players themselves, did very little wrong but the fact that Leinster’s second-string replacements’ bench had a greater impact on proceedings than their own merely highlights the gulf between these two champion teams.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

H
Hellhound 32 minutes ago
South Africa player ratings | 2024 Autumn Nations Series

There is this thing going around against Siya Kolisi where they don't want him to be known as the best national captain ever, so they strike him down in ratings permanently whenever they can. They want McCaw and reckons he is the best captain ever. I disagree.


Just like they refuse to see SA as the best team and some have even said that should the Boks win a third WC in a row, they will still not be the best team ever. Even if they win every game between now and the WC. That is some serious hate coming SA's way.


Everyone forget how the McCaw AB's intimidated refs, was always on the wrong side, played on the ground etc. Things they would never have gotten away with today. They may have a better win ratio, but SA build depth, not caring about rank inbetween WC's until this year.


They weren't as bad inbetween as people claim, because non e of their losses was big ones and they almost never faced the strongest Bok team outside of the WC, allowing countries like France and Ireland to rise to the top unopposed.


Rassie is still at it, building more depth, getting more young stars into the fold. By the time he leaves (I hope never) he will leave a very strong Bok side for the next 15- 20 years. Not everyone will play for 20 years, but each year Rassie acknowledge the young stars and get them involved and ready for international rugby.


Not everyone will make it to the WC, but those 51/52 players will compete for those spots for the WC. They will deliver their best. The future of the Boks is in very safe hands. The only thing that bothers me is Rassie's health. If he can overcome it, rugby looks dark for the rest of the rugby world. He is already the greatest coach in WR history. By the time he retires, he will be the biggest legend any sport has ever seen

2 Go to comments
J
JW 47 minutes ago
'They smelt it': Scott Robertson says Italy sensed All Blacks' vulnerability

No where to be seen OB!


The crosses for me for the year where (from memory);


This was a really hard one to nail down as the first sign of a problem, now that I've asked myself to think about it. I'd say it all started with his decision to not back form and fit players after all the injuries, and/or him picking players for the future, rather ones that could play right now.


First he doesn't replace Perofeta straight away (goes on for months in the team) after injury against England, second he falls back to Beauden Barrett to cover at fullback against Fiji, then he drops Narawa the obvious choice to have started, then he brings in Jordan too soon. That Barret selection (and to a lesser extent Bell's) set the tone for the year.


Then he didn't get the side up for Argentina. They were blown away and didn't look like they expected a fight and were well beaten despite the scoreline in my opinion. Worst performance of the year in the forth game and..


Basically the same problems were persistent, or even exaggerated, after that with the players he did select not given much of an opportunity, with this year having the most number of unused subs I can remember since the amateur days.


What I think I started to realise early on was that he didn't back himself and his team. I think he prepared the players well, don't get me wrong, but I'll credit him with making a conscious choice in tempering his ambition and instead choosing cohesion and to respect (the idea of it being important in himself and his players) experience first and foremost (after two tight games and that 4th game loss). I think he chose wrong in deciding not to be, and back, himself. Hard criticism.


And it played out by preferring Beauden to Dmac on the EOYT (though that may have been a planned move).


I hope I'm right, because going through all the little things of the season and coming up with these bullets, I've got to wonder when I say his last fault is one we have seen at the Crusaders, playing his best players into the ground. What I'm really scared of now is that not wanting a bit of freshness in this last game could be linked with all these other crosses that I want to put down to simple confidence issues. But are they really a sign that he just lacks vision?


Now, that's not to say I haven't seen a lot of positives as well, I just think that for the ABs to go where they want to go he has to fix these crosses. Just have difficult that will be is the question.

23 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING ‘Right a few wrongs’: Ex-Wales flyer’s message of intent with Crusaders ‘Right a few wrongs’: Ex-Wales flyer’s message of intent with Saders
Search