Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Leinster sweating over Baird and Lowe injuries

James Lowe /PA

Leinster are sweating on at least two major injury concerns ahead of their Heineken Champions Cup semi-final against Toulouse, revealing this afternoon that they may be without the services of Ryan Baird and James Lowe.

ADVERTISEMENT

Leinster hammered Leicester Tigers 55-24 in front of a restricted 27,000 crowd at the Aviva Stadium on Friday night, but it didn’t come without a cost.

Baird, who was forced to leave the field in the first half against Leicester Tigers, has been ruled out for at least a “few weeks” due to a shoulder injury. Meanwhile, Lowe injured his calf in the second half of the same game, and his status is still uncertain as further assessments are required.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Lowe appeared to injure himself celebrating Jamieson Gibson-Park’s second-half try.

Leinster had already been dealing with several injuries ahead of their quarter-final clash with the Tigers. However, the likes of Caelan Doris and Garry Ringrose were cleared to play after successfully returning from the Graduated Return to Play Protocols. They both made a successful return to the field and came through the game with no issues.

The absence of Baird and Lowe would undoubtedly be a significant blow to Leinster’s chances of securing a place in a home final in the Aviva. The back-5 forward has been in impressive form this season, while Lowe has been one of the top try-scorers in the competition so far. As Leinster prepares for the crucial clash with Toulouse, Leo Cullen will be hoping that Lowe’s injury is not serious.

The Irish province said they have no further updates on the status of other injured players, including Josh van der Flier, Johnny Sexton, Jamie Osborne, Rónan Kelleher, Joe McCarthy, Cormac Foley, Martin Moloney, and Charlie Ngatai.

Over the weekend Ireland and Leinster legend Sexton appeared to indicate in an interview with the Sunday Times that he had played his last game for Leinster.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Yep, that's exactly what I want.

Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.

It's 'or'. If Glasgow won the URC or Scotland won the six nations. If one of those happens I believe it will (or should) be because the league is in a strong place, and that if a Scotland side can do that, there next best club team should be allowed to reach for the same and that would better serve the advancement of the game.


Now, of course picking a two team league like Scotland is the extreme case of your argument, but I'm happy for you to make it. First, Edinbourgh are a good mid table team, so they are deserving, as my concept would have predicted, of the opportunity to show can step up. Second, you can't be making a serious case that Gloucester are better based on beating them, surely. You need to read Nicks latest article on SA for a current perspective on road teams in the EPCR. Christ, you can even follow Gloucester and look at the team they put out the following week to know that those games are meaningless.


More importantly, third. Glasgow are in a league/pool with Italy, So the next team to be given a spot in my technically imperfect concept would be Benneton. To be fair to my idea that's still in it's infancy, I haven't given any thought to those 'two team' leagues/countries yet, and I'm not about to 😋

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.

Incorrect. You aren't obviously familiar with knockout football Finn, it's a 'one off' game. But in any case, that's not your argument. You're trying to suggest they're not better than the fourth ranked team in the Challenge Cup that hasn't already qualified in their own league, so that could be including quarter finalists. I have already given you an example of a team that is the first to get knocked out by the champions not getting a fair ranking to a team that loses to one of the worst of the semi final teams (for example).

Sharks are better

There is just so much wrong with your view here. First, the team that you are knocking out for this, are the Stormers, who weren't even in the Challenge Cup. They were the 7th ranked team in the Champions Cup. I've also already said there is good precedent to allow someone outside the league table who was heavily impacted early in the season by injury to get through by winning Challenge Cup. You've also lost the argument that Sharks qualify as the third (their two best are in my league qualification system) South African team (because a SAn team won the CC, it just happened to be them) in my system. I'm doubt that's the last of reasons to be found either.


Your system doesn't account for performance or changes in their domestic leagues models, and rely's heavily on an imperfect and less effective 'winner takes all' model.

Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't.

No your systems doesn't. Not all the time/circumstances. You literally just quoted me describing how they aren't going to care about Challenge Cup if they are already qualifying through league performance. They are also not going to hinder their chance at high seed in the league and knockout matches, for the pointless prestige of the Challenge Cup.


My idea fixes this by the suggesting that say a South African or Irish side would actually still have some desire to win one of their own sides a qualification spot if they win the Challenge Cup though. I'll admit, its not the strongest incentive, but it is better than your nothing. I repeat though, if your not balance entries, or just my assignment, then obviously winning the Challenge Cup should get you through, but your idea of 4th place getting in a 20 team EPCR? Cant you see the difference lol


Not even going to bother finishing that last paragraph. 8 of 10 is not an equal share.

126 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING James O'Connor on Crusaders preseason: 'I haven't experienced anything like it' O'Connor on Crusaders preseason
Search