Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Les Bleuettes expect tough crunch vs England after 74-0 win in April

France U20 féminines à Parme. Photo : France Rugby

“A Crunch is always a special experience,” says Kelly Arbey, France’s winger/full-back. She knows this well, as the last Crunch she experienced with the women’s U20s was in Rouen on April 20th.

ADVERTISEMENT

On that day, Les Bleuettes dominated the Roses 74-0, with Arbey scoring a hat-trick.

It was not only France’s biggest win in this fixture but also the worst defeat ever suffered by an English women’s team.

The next meeting between France and England will be in Parma on Sunday, July 14th, marking the conclusion of the inaugural Six Nations Women’s Summer Series.

“This Crunch will be nothing like the first one,” warns France’s number eight, Marie Morland. “Their team has changed. We’re not expecting the same game at all. We’re not going to refer to the previous game because the context and the teams are different.

“These girls are in a fierce state of mind, always together, always giving their best. We can’t afford not to be at our highest level.”

“The first team we played was very strong physically,” comments Kelly Arbey (19, two caps). “At times, we were even a little surprised by their play, whether in the scrum or lineout. The game was often challenging.

“These are girls who are hard to break down, who look for impact. We’ll have to work hard and manage them well. There is a lot at stake for us, but also for them.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

Captain Zoé Jean will be on hand to keep her team’s feet on the ground should they expect an easy game.

“For me, the scoreline in Rouen doesn’t really reflect what happened on the pitch,” she admits. “We won by a large margin, but it was a very tough, hard-fought game with a lot of contact. We’re up against some tough opposition, and they’re going to come at us really hard.

“It’s a blow to the ego to lose like that, and we’ll have to be very wary of them.”

“You could see that as soon as England felt they were in danger, they pushed forward and moved quickly,” adds coach Caroline Suné.

ADVERTISEMENT

Despite comfortable wins over Wales (57-12) and Scotland (67-10), France feels that the road to victory was a chaotic one.

“The first 20 minutes against Scotland were a bit complicated in a game where we were slightly dominated at the start because we were taken by surprise,” observes Arbey. “We weren’t ready to play in that kind of weather, maybe not ready to play against a team that played a bit like us, where they played with the ball a lot, and we weren’t used to that style of play.

“Usually, these girls are better in midfield and come out to fight. But here, we had a team that played with a lot of possession and speed, and we weren’t prepared for that.”

Nevertheless, France’s U20 women remain as motivated as ever. And while they won’t be expecting the fireworks of Rouen on Sunday, they’ll be happy with a win at the end of this inaugural edition of the Women’s Summer Series.

“We are desperate for this win, to be the first ever. That’s what the coaches are telling us, and that’s what we’re thinking about. It’s important to show today that we are girls and that women’s rugby is moving forward, that we are capable of winning big and playing big games,” insists Arbey.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Young Highlanders tested by Jamie Joseph's preseason Jamie Joseph testing young Highlanders
Search