Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

Les septistes françaises titulaires contre le Pays de Galles

LE CAP, AFRIQUE DU SUD - 10 DÉCEMBRE : Anne-Cécile Ciofani (France) plaquée par Faith Nathan (Australie) pendant le match entre l'Australie et la France en finale féminine lors de la deuxième journée du HSBC SVNS Cape Town au DHL Stadium le 10 décembre 2023 au Cap, en Afrique du Sud. (Photo par Ashley Vlotman/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

Le staff du XV de France féminin a dévoilé son équipe qui affrontera le Pays de Galles dimanche 21 avril 2024 au Cardiff Arms Park à 16h15 (heure française).

ADVERTISEMENT

La nouveauté la plus remarquable est la titularisation d’emblée des trois septistes Anne-Cécile Ciofani, Chloé Jacquet et Jonna Grisez, revenues dix jours avant du HSBC SVNS Hongkong où la France a terminé au pied du podium.

Rencontre
Womens Six Nations
Wales Womens
0 - 40
Temps complet
France Womens
Toutes les stats et les données

Véritable star du circuit mondial de rugby à sept, Ciofani, qui vivra à Cardiff la toute première sélection de sa carrière de quinziste, a battu le record d’essais français marqués en une seule saison depuis le début de cette année (29). Plus d’un tiers des essais de sa carrière sont venus par deux. Elle est d’ailleurs la troisième joueuse à avoir inscrit le plus de doublés (5) sur le circuit cette année.

Sa présence comme ailière pourrait faire des étincelles contre le Pays de Galles, une équipe en perte de vitesse cette année, peut-être l’adversaire idéal pour lancer la septiste dans le grand bain du XV.

Le retour de Joanna Grisez et de Chloé Jacquet

Anne-Cécile Ciofani n’est pas la seule septiste à être titularisée contre le Pays de Galles puisque Joanna Grisez (27 ans, 5 sélections) sera alignée sur l’autre l’aile.

Arrière polyvalente, Chloé Jacquet (22 ans, 16 sélections) est également du déplacement à Cardiff au poste de trois-quarts centre elle aussi, un poste qu’elle a déjà occupé à de nombreuses reprises.

Il s’agira d’un premier test pour Grisez et Jacquet depuis que la France a battu le Canada lors de la finale de bronze de la Coupe du Monde Rugby Féminin 2021 en novembre 2022.

Ces arrivées et ces changements de position ne semblent pas avoir posé de souci dans le groupe tant les frontières sont poreuses entre le sept et le XV.

ADVERTISEMENT

« Ce sont des filles qu’on a l’habitude de côtoyer. Joanna a fait la Coupe du Monde avec nous et s’est intégrée de manière très rapide et facile », indiquait d’ailleurs Alexandra Chambon (23 ans, 20 sélections), appelée sur le banc.

« Ce sont de grosses travailleuses ; il n’y a pas d’appréhension là-dessus. Elles ont des qualités individuelles plutôt exceptionnelles. Elles peuvent apporter beaucoup par leur présence. »

Même première ligne et même charnière

Pour la première fois, les sœurs Feleu seront titulaires. Après être entrée en cours de jeu contre l’Italie, la numéro 8 Téani (21 ans, 1 sélection) retrouvera sa sœur, la capitaine et deuxième-ligne Manaé Feleu (24 ans, 15 sélections) pour la première fois sur un match international.

Pour la quatrième fois, la première-ligne bordelaise est reconduite à l’identique avec Annaëlle Deshaye (28 ans, 46 sélections), Agathe Sochat (28 ans, 50 sélections) et Assia Khalfaoui (23 ans, 21 sélections). Même chose pour la charnière Pauline Bouron-Sansus (28 ans, 55 sélections) et Lina Queyroi (22 ans, 12 sélections).

A l’arrière, seules Gabrielle Vernier (26 ans, 43 sélections) et l’arrière Emilie Boulard (24 ans, 29 sélections) sont conservées pour la quatrième fois du Tournoi là aussi.

ADVERTISEMENT

Parmi les autres changements, la troisième-ligne Charlotte Escudero (23 ans, 18 sélections) sera testée pour la première fois en deuxième-ligne, renvoyant Madoussou Fall sur le banc et Romane Ménager (27 ans, 60 sélections) passe côté fermé pour laisser sa place à Téani Feleu.

L’équipe de France (contre le Pays de Galles)

  1. Annaëlle Deshayes (28 ans, 46 sélections)
  2. Agathe Sochat (28 ans, 50 sélections)
  3. Assia Khalfaoui (23 ans, 12 sélections)
  4. Manae Feleu (c) (24 ans, 15 sélections)
  5. Charlotte Escudero (23 ans, 18 sélections)
  6. Romane Ménager (27 ans, 60 sélections)
  7. Emeline Gros (28 ans, 31 sélections)
  8. Teani Feleu (21 ans, 1 sélection)
  9. Pauline Bourdon-Sansus (28 ans, 55 sélections)
  10. Lina Queyroi (22 ans, 12 sélections)
  11. Anne-Cécile Ciofani (30 ans, 0 sélection)
  12. Gabrielle Vernier (26 ans, 43 sélections)
  13. Chloé Jacquet (22 ans, 16 sélections)
  14. Joanna Grisez (27 ans, 5 sélections)
  15. Emilie Boulard (24 ans, 29 sélections)Remplaçantes
  16. Elisa Riffonneau (20 ans, 8 sélections)
  17. Ambre Mwayembe (20 ans, 8 sélections)
  18. Clara Joyeux (26 ans, 43 sélections)
  19. MadoussouFall (26 ans, 28 sélections)
  20. Gaëlle Hermet (27 ans, 61 sélections)
  21. Alexandra Chambon (23 ans, 20 sélections)
  22. Lina Tuy (19 ans, 2 sélections)
  23. Morgane Bourgesoi (21 ans, 7 sélections)
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 11 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

147 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

147 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search