Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Letter of the law or frivolous calls?: Coaches and players have their say on sizeable penalty count in Chiefs' win over Highlanders

Ben O'Keeffe and his refereeing team. (Photo by Dianne Manson/Getty Images)

The opening rounds of last year’s Super Rugby Aotearoa 2020 competition was characterised by exceptionally high penalty counts.

ADVERTISEMENT

That was attributed to the new breakdown interpretations, which players initially struggled to adjust with. As the weeks passed, players became better accustomed to the new laws while the referees also appeared to ease off on the penalties.

A year on, Saturday’s night match between the Highlanders and Chiefs in Dunedin was again laden with penalties, with 23 whistled up by Ben O’Keeffe.

Video Spacer

All Blacks Dane Coles, Sevu Reece, Shannon Frizell, and Scott Barrett share their favourite drills, what other position they want to play and what their number one tip is for young rugby players. Brought to you by Healthspan Elite.

Video Spacer

All Blacks Dane Coles, Sevu Reece, Shannon Frizell, and Scott Barrett share their favourite drills, what other position they want to play and what their number one tip is for young rugby players. Brought to you by Healthspan Elite.

It wasn’t the breakdown that was causing both side’s troubles, however; it something much more mundane.

Time and time again, the two teams were pinged for players advancing in front of the kicker.

Mitch Brown, who notched up his 50th match for the Chiefs, was stung twice by O’Keeffe, with the referee telling Chiefs captain Brad Weber that the punishments could increase for Brown if he wasn’t careful.

The offences were all relatively minor in the scheme of things. More often than not, forwards were the ones facing O’Keeffe’s wrath – and rarely were they advancing to actually put pressure on the defending side.

Still, O’Keeffe was consistent – and that’s what both coaches focussed on in the post-match wrap-up.

ADVERTISEMENT

“That’s the law,” said Highlanders head Tony Brown. “The referees are doing a great job at refereeing the law, and players aren’t adapting quick enough.

“Just not quite smart enough in those situations, for us, and obviously the Chiefs had a couple of those situations as well.”

Chiefs coach Clayton McMillan had a similar take.

“A lot of the penalties are legit,” he said. “Players on both sides needed to be smarter.

“As long as the referees are consistent. If they ask you not to advance on a kick then don’t advance. It’s as simple as that.”

ADVERTISEMENT

McMillan, who’s now led the Chiefs to three victories on the trot, didn’t lump all the blame on his players, however.

“It’s probably challenging at times, especially here [at Forsyth Barr Stadium]. The noise is unbelievable under the roof.

“While we can hear the refs’ comms in our box pretty clear, not everyone on the field is going to be able to hear that, or see when people put them onside.

“So, they’re going to be a little inaccurate at times there, but as long as the referees are consistent then we just have to be better in that space.”

The Chiefs’ 26-23 extra-time win takes them into third place on the Super Rugby Aotearoa table – two ahead of the Highlanders (who have played an extra game) and two behind the Blues.

While the Chiefs’ finals fate is still in their own hands, the Highlanders are now effectively out of the contest.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 5 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

7 Go to comments
J
JW 9 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search