Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Marler's availability is silver lining as Harlequins change 5 for first match since Gustard exit

(Photo by Dan Mullan/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

Harlequins skipper Stephan Lewies has hailed the prospect of having England cry-off Joe Marler starting for the London club in Sunday’s Gallagher Premiership match at Wasps, their first outing since last week’s departure with immediate effect of director of rugby Paul Gustard.

ADVERTISEMENT

Loosehead Marler had been included in the original England squad of 28 for the Guinness Six Nations when it was announced last Friday. By the following Monday, though, he declared himself unavailable due to the restrictions which meant too long a time away from his family because of the tight controls England are under in their bio-secure camp.  

The decision by Marler was openly accepted by England boss Eddie Jones, who stressed this didn’t mean the end of the prop’s Test career. And it has also been welcomed by Harlequins, who will now unexpectedly get the services of Marler at a time in the season when they thought he would be off-limits to them.   

Video Spacer

Ex-Harlequins winger Chris Ashton gives his first media conference as a Worcester player

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 18:52
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 18:52
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
    • en (Main), selected
    Video Spacer

    Ex-Harlequins winger Chris Ashton gives his first media conference as a Worcester player

    “That is massive for us having Joe there, another senior player adding value on the pitch, having a cool head,” enthused Lewies at a Harlequins media conference. “He helps me a lot on and off the field, so it is a big one for us having him there.”

    The South African second row’s inclusion in the team to play at The Ricoh is one of the five changes to the XV form the team that drew with London Irish on January 10, a contest at The Stoop that turned out to be Gustard’s final game in charge as he soon quit for a three-year assistant’s role at Benetton in Italy.  

    “It has been a lot of emotions for us the last week or so but as players, we are in a blessed situation. If you compare us to the rest of the world, people in lockdown and sitting in their homes, we’re very blessed that we can go out and play with our mates.

    “We just use that as motivation to work hard, concentrate on our job and not get distracted by all the things going on behind the scenes. I was surprised a little bit (by Gustard leaving). Some people had more info than others at different times. For a lot of us, it was a surprise.”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Lewies, who had been out injured, comes into the team for Glen Young, as does the recently suspended Andre Esterhuizen for James Lang. Aaron Morris for Cadan Murley, Danny Care for Scott Steele and Archie White for Tom Lawday are the other Harlequins changes for the trip to Wasps where a huge focus will be put on improving their defence.

    “It’s a massive focus for us. Our discipline has been letting us down this season massively. That is probably our biggest work on. Without discipline, giving people entry into our 22. We’re giving quality opposition opportunity to drive at us from five metres out seven or eight times a game whereas we only get one twice that opportunity so that is going to hurt you. 

    “Our discipline in defence has been a big work on but also in attack, we have such exciting players, if we can only keep a bit more possession and actually put pressure on other teams we would have to defend less and that would sort out some of the problems.”

    HARLEQUINS (vs Wasps, Sunday)
    1. Joe Marler (208 club appearances), 2. Scott Baldwin (25), 3. Wilco Louw (11), 4. Matt Symons (47), 5. Stephan Lewies (21) – capt, 6. Archie White (32), 7. Will Evans (28), 8. Alex Dombrandt (59); 9. Danny Care (289), 10. Marcus Smith (93); 11. Aaron Morris (54), 12. Andre Esterhuizen (8), 13. Joe Marchant (96), 14. Louis Lynagh (4), 15. Mike Brown (340). Reps: 16. Elia Elia (59), 17. Jordan Els (8), 18. Simon Kerrod (33), 19. Glen Young (27), 20. Richard de Carpentier (1), 21. Martin Landajo (22), 22. James Lang (73), 23. Tyrone Green (3).

    ADVERTISEMENT

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Cape Town | Leg 1 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series 2025 | Full Day Replay

    Gloucester-Hartpury vs Bristol Bears | PWR 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

    Boks Office | Episode 36 | Six Nations Round 3 Review

    Why did Scotland's Finn Russell take the crucial kick from the wrong place? | Whistle Watch

    England A vs Ireland A | Full Match Replay

    Kubota Spears vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | JRLO 2024/2025 | Full Match Replay

    O2 Inside Line: This Rose | Episode 3 | France Week

    Watch now: Lomu - The Lost Tapes

    Trending on RugbyPass

    Comments

    0 Comments
    Be the first to comment...

    Join free and tell us what you really think!

    Sign up for free
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Latest Features

    Comments on RugbyPass

    c
    cornelisjohannes 11 minutes ago
    Ireland player ratings vs France | 2025 Six Nations

    This entire experience has been nothing short of overwhelming and deeply frustrating for me. A little over a month ago, I made a substantial investment exceeding $172,000,00 USD through an online brokerage that was recommended to me by a family friend. Initially, the situation appeared to be encouraging, with my investments showing promising growth and progress. However, everything took a dramatic and distressing turn when I attempted to withdraw my funds. Suddenly, and without any warning, the broker began to withhold my earnings. To my shock, they insisted that I pay a hefty "membership fee" of $20,000 in order to have my account unfrozen, despite the fact that I had already fulfilled all of their stated requirements. When I sought clarification and questioned their sudden demand, they responded by insisting on additional payments, without providing any clear explanation or justification for their actions. The situation escalated further when they began pressuring me to disclose the source of the funds I had invested. This demand made no sense to me; it had no relevance to my account or the transactions I had made. When I refused to comply with their intrusive request, they resorted to threats, warning me that they would blacklist me, citing that I allegedly still owed them money—despite my having paid every fee they had required. I felt utterly trapped and overwhelmed by this entire ordeal. It was during this tumultuous time that a student of mine from Arizona, who had encountered a similar predicament, suggested that I reach out to a company called BOTNET CRYPTO RECOVERY. She shared her own positive experience with them, explaining how they had successfully assisted her in recovering her lost funds. Encouraged by her story, I decided to take the plunge and contact BOTNET CRYPTO RECOVERY, holding out hope for a resolution. I am genuinely grateful that I made that decision. The team at BOTNET CRYPTO RECOVERY was incredibly professional, dedicated, and persistent throughout the entire recovery process. They provided me with guidance every step of the way, and thanks to their expertise and support, I was able to reclaim my full refund. I wholeheartedly encourage anyone who finds themselves in a similar unfortunate situation to consider reaching out to BOTNET CRYPTO RECOVERY (botnetcryptorecovery . com). They truly came to my rescue and saved me from what could have been a devastating financial loss. Email them on: ( botnetcryptorecovery  @ groupmail . com )

    282 Go to comments
    f
    fl 44 minutes ago
    Late try spares Ireland from further ignominy in world rankings

    I’m quite confused by your comment, but this is the way to do it:

    “base this solely on what happens in the Pools. So best 4 Pool winners will play best 4 third place and assuming the top 4 pool winners progress, they will avoid eachother until the semi”

    Just like they do in the champions cup.


    “The problems with this is that Big teams will be encouraged to absolutely trash minnows raking up huge scores”

    I actually don’t agree that this is the case.


    If this method had been used to rank teams in the 2023 RWC, the ranking after the pool stages would have been:

    Ireland (19 table points; 144 points difference)

    Wales (19 TP; 84 PD)

    France (18 TP; 178 PD)

    England (18 TP; 111 PD)

    New Zealand (15 TP; 206 PD)

    South Africa (15 TP; 117 PD)

    Argentina (14 TP)

    Fiji (11 TP)


    Ireland’s most dominant result was 82-8 against Romania, a smaller margin of victory than South Africa and Scotland managed against the Romanians - but Ireland still manage to get top seed. Wales’ most dominant victory was 40-6 against Australia - only Fiji recorded a smaller margin of victory in their most dominant result - and yet Wales still get 2nd seed because they got a bonus point in 3 of their 4 games. What this system rewards most of all is consistency of performance, and victory in the pool’s most difficult fixtures.


    If this system had been applied in 2023 it would have arguably produced a much fairer draw, with the QF matches being:

    IRE v FIJ

    WAL v ARG

    FRA v RSA

    ENG v NZE

    so New Zealand get a slightly easier fixture, and Ireland get a much easier fixture. South Africa get the same draw, but in this scenario that isn’t just bad luck - its punishment for losing to Ireland. I guess France can feel slightly hard done by, but they could have avoided South Africa if they had scored 4 tries against Uruguay.

    13 Go to comments
    TRENDING
    TRENDING Furious Fabien Galthie says France have cited two Ireland players over Antoine Dupont incident Furious Fabien Galthie says France have cited 2 Irish players
    Search