Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Liam Squire makes decision on World Cup availability for All Blacks

Liam Squire. (Photo by Kai Schwoerer/Getty Images)

Expect Liam Squire to be included in the All Blacks‘ 31-man World Cup squad at midday on Wednesday.

ADVERTISEMENT

According to Stuff, the 23-test star has notified All Blacks management that he has made himself available for selection for next month’s tournament, making him a frontrunner to be included in what should be a five-man loose forward group.

Squire had earlier imposed an exile from the national team on himself, becoming unavailable for the All Blacks’ 39-man Rugby Championship squad last month after injuries and personal issues ruined his Super Rugby campaign.

He had told All Blacks head coach Steve Hansen that he “didn’t feel ready” to play test rugby following just three matches for the Highlanders this year, and has instead been plying his trade in the Mitre 10 Cup with Tasman.

While playing for the Mako, Squire has impressed onlookers with a string of commanding performances in Tasman’s opening three matches of the season.

With two tries to his name, the 28-year-old’s physicality and abrasiveness from the side of the scrum have been noticeable as his side remains unbeaten with spellbinding victories over Wellington, Canterbury and Manawatu to kick-off their 2019 season.

Those displays from Squire has led to calls from many for the NTT DoCoMo Red Hurricanes-bound loose forward to be included in the World Cup squad, but that was always going to come down to whether he felt ready to make the step back up to international rugby.

ADVERTISEMENT

After letting selectors Hansen, Ian Foster and Grant Fox know that he is willing to return to the test arena, it is now up to them to fast track him back into the national set-up, and it’s difficult not to envisage them doing so.

Squire has been a valued member of the All Blacks since the decline of veteran No. 6 Jerome Kaino two years ago, and has been regularly deployed as the team’s starting blindside flanker.

His self-imposed omission from test rugby has seen Vaea Fifita, Luke Jacobson, Shannon Frizell and Ardie Savea all tried on the short side of the scrum, but none – aside from Savea – have really filled Squire’s boots.

Even with a comprehensive outing at No. 6 against Australia at Eden Park a fortnight ago, the in-form Savea doesn’t possess the same brutality on defence and attack that Squire provides, which is what the national coaches rate so highly about him.

ADVERTISEMENT

Those coaches can now equip their side with those benefits that Squire brings in two days’ time.

He will be supported by Savea, Sam Cane and Kieran Read, all of whom are certainties to be selected in the loose forwards, while openside flanker Matt Todd should earn himself a place on the plane as the back-up out-and-out openside behind Cane.

In other news:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes
Search