Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Likely Champions Cup round of 16 draw will see Exeter visit Wasps, Radradra back at Bordeaux

(Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

A repeat of last October’s 2019/20 Gallagher Premiership final between Exeter and Wasps is on the cards if Champions Cup organisers EPCR decide to restart the suspended tournament using the current pool standings to host a knockout round of 16. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Other Champions Cup fixtures would see Pat Lam’s Bristol travel to Bordeaux, a match-up that would result in Semi Radradra returning to his old French club, while Irish favourites Leinster would host Premiership strugglers Gloucester in Dublin. 

When it came to the quarter-final knockout stages in previous years, EPCR would rank the eight qualified teams from 1 to 8 based on the number of points they received across the six pools and they would then pair them off as follows: 1 vs 8, 2 vs 7, 3 vs 6 and 4 vs 5. 

Video Spacer

Referee JP Doyle joins Simon Zebo and Ryan Wilson on RugbyPass Offload

Video Spacer

Referee JP Doyle joins Simon Zebo and Ryan Wilson on RugbyPass Offload

Since 2014/15, this pool format consisted of 20 teams spread across five pools of four. However, due to the pandemic, EPCR opted for two pools of twelve teams this season, a total of 24 teams, and the plan was for each team to play four matches. 

That didn’t happen. Just two rounds were played in December, but that has been enough to produce a league table that should see the teams drawn as follows for a round of 16 knockout stage to get the season restarted. 

Applying the same criteria used in past seasons to decide the quarter-final draw, this is how the round of 16 Champions Cup draw would look going by the current standings after two rounds in Pool A and B: 

Leinster (A1) v Gloucester (B8)
Wasps (A2) v Exeter (B7)
Bordeaux (A3) v Bristol (B6)
La Rochelle (A4) v Clermont (B5)
Lyon (B1) v Sale (A8)
Racing (B2) v Toulon (A7)
Toulouse (B3) v Edinburgh (A6)
Munster (B4) v Scarlets (A5)

ADVERTISEMENT

The pairings would raise eyebrows. One all-Premiership clash and two all-Top 14 clashes in a round of 16 featuring the top eight from each pool, a line-up consisting of six Premiership teams, six Top 14 teams and four from the PRO14. 

The inclusion of Sale – who didn’t win either of their two December games, picking up just a single losing bonus point – would go against the grain of the high standards demanded in previous Champions Cups where a team would normally need to win at least four of their six pool games to reach the quarter-finals. 

Sale’s one-point tally for eighth spot in Pool A is two less than Ulster who are in ninth place in Pool B but getting the top eight from each pool to play each other is the easiest way to try and take a step forward after what has been a disastrous season for the credibility of the Champions Cup.  

Premiership Rugby boss Darren Childs confirmed on Thursday that a knockout phase launched by a round of 16 was the likely option for restarting the stalled tournament and confirmation is due within a fortnight. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“It was decided very quickly by all three leagues CEOs that we would complete the tournament in the four remaining weekends,” he said. “The exact structure has not been agreed and we have already started those discussions.”  

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 35 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

152 Go to comments
J
JW 7 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

152 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search