Lions bolter Sam Simmonds succeeds Jack Willis as RPA player of the year

The closest they have come is signing BB a month after the RWC ended (while contracted in Japan) with a specific statement that he can play immediately for NZ upon is return, as a sabbatical etc. He even petitioned to be in last years SR season ending.

That is not the case with Leicester, upon all standards he will have to play in this years NPC season before he can be selected. That rules him out of the July and RC tests.

Of course now school is seen as so much more important, and sports as much more important to schooling, that those rural/public gets get these scholarships/free entry to play at private schools.

This might only be relevant in the tradition private rugby schools, so not worth implementing, but the same drain has been seen in NZ to the point where the public schools are not just impacted by the lost of their best talent to private schools, there is a whole flow on effect of losing players to other sports their school can' still compete at the highest levels in, and staff quality etc. So now and of that traditional sort of rivalry is near lost as I understand it.

The idea to force the top level competition into having equal public school participation would be someway to 'force' that neglect into reverse. The problem with such a simple idea is of course that if good rugby talent decides to stay put in order to get easier exposure, they suffer academically on principle. I wonder if a kid who say got selected for a school rep 1st/2nd team before being scouted by a private school, or even just say had two or three years there, could choose to rep their old school for some of their rugby still?

Like say a new Cup style comp throughout the season, kid's playing for the private school in their own local/private school grade comp or whatever, but when its Cup games they switch back? Better represent, areas, get more 2nd players switching back for top level 1st comp at their old school etc? Just even in order to have cool stories where Ella or Barrett brothers all switch back to show their old school is actually the best of the best?

🐥

And yet you step into the breach and make it too easy anyway.

The gist from the previous thread is that you wanted England to make more passes, no?

You don't make more passes and improve your attack without going deeper into the phase count.

So you would have change the balance of the team as a whole - and two ball-carriers like Willis and Earl at 8 and 7 would help you achieve that aim.

I'm very confused given that you introduced the snooker analogy in order to immediately argue against it