Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Lions great Edwards wants Warburton recalled

British and Irish Lions captain Sam Warburton

Sir Gareth Edwards is urging Warren Gatland to recall British and Irish Lions captain Sam Warburton to the starting XV for the second test in Wellington, despite admitting the back row at Eden Park had looked “ absolutely superb”.

ADVERTISEMENT

While it sounds as if one of the heroes of the 1971 Lions test winning team in New Zealand is contradicting himself, he made it clear on BBC radio that a recall for Warburton, after he was reduced to a replacement role in the first test, was based on the flanker’s work at the break down.

Edwards is also aware that his call could be seen as Welsh bias and said: ” I do admit he is a favourite of mine but it is not based on emotion or nationality, it is about effectiveness in the tackle area. I thought the first test back row looked absolutely superb, but when Sam Warburton came on we looked far more effective in the tackle area.”

Slowing the All Blacks possession down to allow the Lions to reorganise their defence will be one of the key areas for this week’s planning and training for the touring team and if Gatland listens to Edwards the either  Peter O’Mahony, who captained the Lions in the first test, or openside flanker Sean O’Brien would have to be sacrificed.  Mahony’s line out work has been a key element in the Lions armoury while O’Brien’s physicality has made a significant impression  – up to the first test defeat.

Warburton was hampered by injury leading up to the Lions tour and was not been able to deliver an 80minute performance to make a strong case for a test start leading into the Eden Park game. However, Gatland knows that Warburton can be a real handful at the tackle area with his ability to slow down opposition ball and his leadership qualities have never been in question.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 12 minutes ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Set pieces are important and the way teams use them is a great indication of how they play the game. No team is showcasing their revolution more than the Springboks. This year they have mauled less and primarily in the attacking third. Otherwise they have tended to set like they are going to maul and then play around the corner or shove the ball out the back. They arent also hitting the crash ball carrier constantly but instead they are choosing to use their width or a big carrying forward in wider areas. While their maul is varied the scrum is still a blunt instrument winning penalties before the backs have a go. Some teams have chosen to blunt their set piece game for more control. The All Blacks are kicking more penalties and are using their powerful scrum as an attacking tool choosing that set piece as an attacking weapon. Their willingness to maul more and in different positions is also becoming more prominent. The French continue to play conservative rugby off the set piece using their big bruisers frequently. The set piece is used differently by different teams. Different teams play different ways and can be successful regardless. They can win games with little territory and possession or smash teams with plenty of both. The game of rugby is for all types and sizes and thats true in the modern era. I hope that administrators keep it that way and dont go further towards a Rugby League style situation. Some administrators are of the opinion that rugby is too slow and needs to be sped up. Why not rather empower teams to choose how they want to play and create a framework that favours neither size nor agility. That favours neither slow tempo play or rock n roll rugby. Create a game that favour both and challenge teams to execute their plans. If World Rugby can create a game like that then it will be the ultimate winner.

34 Go to comments
J
JW 5 hours ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

Yep, no one knows what will happen. Thing is I think (this is me arguing a point here not a random debate with this one) they're better off trialing it now in a controlled environment than waiting to open it up in a knee jerk style reaction to a crumbling organtization and team. They can always stop it again.


The principle idea is that why would players leave just because the door is ajar?


BBBR decides to go but is not good enough to retain the jersey after doing it. NZ no longer need to do what I suggest by paying him to get back upto speed. That is solely a concept of a body that needs to do what I call pick and stick wth players. NZR can't hold onto everyone so they have to choose their BBBRs and if that player comes back from a sabbatical under par it's a priority to get him upto speed as fast as possible because half of his competition has been let go overseas because they can't hold onto them all. Changing eligibility removes that dilemma, if a BBBR isn't playing well you can be assured that someone else is (well the idea is that you can be more assured than if you only selected from domestic players).


So if someone decides they want to go overseas, they better do it with an org than is going to help improve them, otherwise theyre still basically as ineligible as if they would have been scorning a NZ Super side that would have given them the best chance to be an All Black.

147 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 2024 in review: All Blacks break Irish hearts by triumphing in Dublin 2024 in review: All Blacks break Irish hearts by triumphing in Dublin
Search