Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Lions shock: Finn Russell to use sevens loophole to change international allegiance and boost tour selection chances

(Photo by David Davies/PA Images via Getty Images)

Scotland star Finn Russell has begun the process to change his international eligibility in the hope of improving his chances of selection for the British and Irish Lions tour to South Africa. Russell, who was red-carded in his side’s latest win over France in the final week of this year’s Guinness Six Nations championship, has been a key performer for Scotland since his international debut in 2014.

ADVERTISEMENT

Arguably one of the top players in Europe over the past 24 months, Russell is considered by some to be a shoo-in for Lions selection but it is understood that the player himself doesn’t hold out much hope of receiving a phone call from Warren Gatland in the coming weeks.

Rightly or wrongly, there is a belief that Scottish players are unfavourably assessed by Gatland, who spent twelve years as head coach of the Wales national side and is set to take charge of his third Lions campaign this year.

Video Spacer

Ex-Wales and Lions scrum-half Mike Philips guests on RugbyPass Offload with Ryan Wilson to review how the Six Nations finished

Video Spacer

Ex-Wales and Lions scrum-half Mike Philips guests on RugbyPass Offload with Ryan Wilson to review how the Six Nations finished

Just two Scottish players – Tommy Seymour and Stuart Hogg – were named in the initial Lions squad for the 2017 tour to New Zealand. Greg Laidlaw was called up pre-tour to replace Ben Youngs while two other Scots were temporarily called into the squad during the tour as part of the Geography Six, Allan Dell and Russell.

With competition coming from the likes of England’s Owen Farrell and George Ford, Ireland’s Johnny Sexton and Wales’ Dan Biggar, Russell is understood to be concerned that his Scottish allegiance could harm his chances and is hopeful that converting to Welsh eligibility could improve his standing with Gatland.

This is possible through the sevens ‘loophole’ which grants players the opportunity to effectively change nationalities – at least from World Rugby’s point of view. Under World Rugby’s eligibility laws – modified due to certain Olympics requirements – it is possible for Russell to commit to representing Wales instead of Scotland in the XVs form of the game if he is able to play in four officially sanctioned sevens tournaments for his new country.

Typically, competitors who have represented one country may switch to another only if they hold a passport for the new country and do not represent the former country for three years. The rules can be modified at the discretion of World Rugby, however, and RugbyPass understands that Russell has countless supporters on the board of the governing body.

ADVERTISEMENT

It is through a similar process that Charles Piutau and Malakai Fekitoa, who previously represented the All Blacks, are said to be considering a stint representing Tonga on the world stage. Sources have confirmed that World Rugby have begun the process of arranging official World Sevens series tournaments over the coming four weekends before the Lions squad is officially named on May 6.

RugbyPass approached the Scotland out-half for comment on the developing story but instead received a response from his agent, April Phillips. “Finn does not wish to comment on the rumours surrounding a change of international eligibility,” Phillips said. “We can confirm, however, that at some stage during the year, one way or another, Finn will be wearing red.”

It’s an unprecedented turn of events – but one that will no doubt leave fans excited at the possibility of seeing Russell run out for the Lions when they take on the world champion Springboks in South Africa.

  • This is clearly a parody article and not to be taken seriously – Happy April Fools Day! 
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 34 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"fl's idea, if I can speak for him to speed things up, was for it to be semifinalists first, Champions Cup (any that somehow didn't make a league semi), then Challenge's semi finalists (which would most certainly have been outside their league semi's you'd think), then perhaps the quarter finalists of each in the same manner. I don't think he was suggesting whoever next performed best in Europe but didn't make those knockouts (like those round of 16 losers), I doubt that would ever happen."


That's not quite my idea.

For a 20 team champions cup I'd have 4 teams qualify from the previous years champions cup, and 4 from the previous years challenge cup. For a 16 team champions cup I'd have 3 teams qualify from the previous years champions cup, and 1 from the previous years challenge cup.


"The problem I mainly saw with his idea (much the same as you see, that league finish is a better indicator) is that you could have one of the best candidates lose in the quarters to the eventual champions, and so miss out for someone who got an easier ride, and also finished lower in the league, perhaps in their own league, and who you beat everytime."

If teams get a tough draw in the challenge cup quarters, they should have won more pool games and so got better seeding. My system is less about finding the best teams, and more about finding the teams who perform at the highest level in european competition.

57 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Would I'd be think"

Would I'd be think.


"Well that's one starting point for an error in your reasoning. Do you think that in regards to who should have a say in how it's setup in the future as well? Ie you would care what they think or what might be more fair for their teams (not saying your model doesn't allow them a chance)?"

Did you even read what you're replying to? I wasn't arguing for excluding south africa, I was pointing out that the idea of quantifying someone's fractional share of european rugby is entirely nonsensical. You're the one who was trying to do that.


"Yes, I was thinking about an automatic qualifier for a tier 2 side"

What proportion of european rugby are they though? Got to make sure those fractions match up! 😂


"Ultimately what I think would be better for t2 leagues would be a third comp underneath the top two tournemnts where they play a fair chunk of games, like double those two. So half a dozen euro teams along with the 2 SA and bottom bunch of premiership and top14, some Championship and div 2 sides thrown in."

I don't know if Championship sides want to be commuting to Georgia every other week.


"my thought was just to create a middle ground now which can sustain it until that time has come, were I thought yours is more likely to result in the constant change/manipulation it has been victim to"

a middle ground between the current system and a much worse system?

57 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Huh? You mean last in their (4 team) pools/regions? My idea was 6/5/4, 6 the max, for guarenteed spots, with a 20 team comp max, so upto 5 WCs (which you'd make/or would be theoretically impossible to go to one league (they'd likely be solely for its participants, say 'Wales', rather than URC specifically. Preferrably). I gave 3 WC ideas for a 18 team comp, so the max URC could have (with a member union or club/team, winning all of the 6N, and Champions and Challenge Cup) would be 9."


That's a lot of words to say that I was right. If (e.g.) Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.


"And the reason say another URC (for example) member would get the spot over the other team that won the Challenge Cup, would be because they were arguable better if they finished higher in the League."

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.


"It won't diminish desire to win the Challenge Cup, because that team may still be competing for that seed, and if theyre automatic qual anyway, it still might make them treat it more seriously"

This doesn't make sense. Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't. Under my system, teams will "compete for the seed" by winning the Challenge Cup, under yours they won't. If a team is automatically qualified anyway why on earth would that make them treat it more seriously?


"I'm promoting the idea of a scheme that never needs to be changed again"

So am I. I'm suggesting that places could be allocated according to a UEFA style points sytem, or according to a system where each league gets 1/4 of the spots, and the remaining 1/4 go to the best performing teams from the previous season in european competition.


"Yours will promote outcry as soon as England (or any other participant) fluctates. Were as it's hard to argue about a the basis of an equal share."

Currently there is an equal share, and you are arguing against it. My system would give each side the opportunity to achieve an equal share, but with more places given to sides and leagues that perform well. This wouldn't promote outcry, it would promote teams to take european competition more seriously. Teams that lose out because they did poorly the previous year wouldn't have any grounds to complain, they would be incentivised to try harder this time around.


"This new system should not be based on the assumption of last years results/performances continuing."

That's not the assumption I'm making. I don't think the teams that perform better should be given places in the competition because they will be the best performing teams next year, but because sport should be based on merit, and teams should be rewarded for performing well.


"I'm specifically promoting my idea because I think it will do exactly what you want, increase european rugyb's importance."

how?


"I won't say I've done anything compressive"

Compressive.

57 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Stuart Lancaster 'wants out' of Racing 92 and eyeing Euro giants job Stuart Lancaster 'wants out' of Racing 92 and eyeing Euro giants job
Search