Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Logo campaigners issue statement as Exeter bin controversial branding

By PA
Press Association

Exeter Chiefs For Change, the group that has campaigned against the club’s use of Native American iconography in their logos, say they are ‘overwhelmed’ with the new kit design.

ADVERTISEMENT

Exeter are set to rebrand themselves this year in line with the ‘Celtic Iron Age Dumnonii Tribe’ after deciding to abandon the controversial Native American theme that has provoked fierce criticism.

The new identity, including a change to their logo, will take effect from July and while the ‘Chiefs’ nickname is being retained, the club said it will be now be aligned with a “poignant and significant nod to the past”.

Video Spacer

Ben Earl talks Saracens socials, Bristol life and England ambitions | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 18

Video Spacer

Ben Earl talks Saracens socials, Bristol life and England ambitions | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 18

The Celtic Iron Age Dumnonii Tribe encompassed an area covering Devon, Cornwall and parts of Somerset for centuries before the Roman occupation from 43AD.

The rebrand is set to cost Exter in the region of £500,000.

Not everyone is happy with the rebranding, with Exeter CEO Tony Rowe suggesting more of their fans wanted to keep the current branding than not.

Chiefs fans have repeatedly been asked by opposition clubs not to wear the symbolic headdress to their grounds, while the National Congress of American Indians wrote to chairman Tony Rowe last year to say that the current branding “harms native people through the offensive stereotypes it promotes”.

“We are excited to welcome in the next era of rugby within Exeter. Exeter has and always will be the most important term in our overall identity,” Rowe said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The term Chiefs, however, is equally entrenched in our make-up, going back to over a century ago when teams in this region would regularly call their first teams that of the Chiefs. We are Exeter, we are the Chiefs!

“As a rugby club we have been willing to listen, we have consulted far and wide, and now we are ready to invoke change.

“This is a new direction for our great club, but equally it’s an exciting vision that I’ve no doubt will propel us onwards and upwards over time.

Related

“Our new imagery will bring to life the pride our supporters have to support their club, unifying us all under one brand that underlines all of our core traditions.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Exeter, the 2020 Gallagher Premiership and Heineken Champions Cup double winners, first officially became known as the Chiefs in 1999 but have had links with the nickname for decades.

Their mascot ‘Big Chief’ was retired last year as opposition to the branding intensified.

In addition to their new association with the Celtic Iron Age Dumnonii Tribe, Exeter are also drawing from the history of the ‘Celtic Kingdom of Dumnonia’, which was established around AD 410 and lasted almost five centuries.

“The change in identity comes in the wake of the Exeter board undertaking a full and informative review process over the past two years,” a club statement read.

“In launching the new imagery, detailed submissions, together with extensive historical research from leading professionals, have been undertaken to ensure the club have a brand that not only recognises our traditions but, more importantly, identifies with our supporters and the region itself.”

Rowe has revealed that the cost to Exeter of making the change is in excess of £500,000 at a time when Premiership clubs are facing financial hardship because of the coronavirus pandemic.

“I’m guessing at the moment because we still haven’t had all the stuff back, but it’s going to be close to half a million pounds at least to do a brand change,” Rowe said.

Related

“We’ve had to struggle in the last couple of years with Covid, to get the money to keep us alive and to keep us here.

“So it’s going to be a big challenge, but we like big challenges at Exeter Rugby so we will do it.

“Two years ago there was a petition with about 7,000 people saying you should change your logo. We also had a petition that raised nearly 10,000 saying don’t change.

“It’s where you sit, but the board decided the time was right to change.”

The Exeter Chiefs for Change Twitter account said that the Chiefs “can now put the controversy behind them”, posting: “Our faith in the club has been restored today and we are overwhelmed with excitement at the new identity for the club – one that celebrates Devon’s own rich history and gives us even more reason to be proud of our club and our region.

“Exeter Chiefs can now put the controversy behind them as we focus on moving onwards and upwards to the next great era in the club’s history. The club has always been so much more than its branding: there was a long history before the Native branding and there will be a long future after it.

“It’s entirely right that. as we learn more about the impact of the things we are doing, we have the strength of character to take that on board and change. Indigenous peoples have long said they are not respected nor honoured by the Native imagery and scientific studies have shown it contributes to some of the ongoing challenges Indigenous peoples face, so we’re relieved that those concerns have been listened to and acted upon.

“We’re really excited to be getting back to just enjoying the rugby – even if that is a cold afternoon at London Irish at the weekend!”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

M
M.W.Keith 1 hour ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

I understand that there are choices to be made in professional sports and choices have consequences, but it does seem strange that a professional athlete who plies their trade in order to make a living cannot represent their country at test level. All talk of loyalty and so on is an outdated argument, we live in a global economy. It makes the armchair critic feel nice and so on, chatting smack about loyalty to a jersey and so on, but to think that someone like Mounga is not loyal to NZ just bc he is taking a paycheck - which as a professional athlete he is entitled to do - is a quite silly. No one is calling PSDT or Handre Pollard disloyal to SA bc they are taking a better paycheck somewhere else. No one accuses Cheslin Kolbe of being disloyal to the Green and Gold just because he missed out on years of eligibility by playing in France. Since Rassie opened the selection policy, the overseas players have more than proved their worth. Anyone who says otherwise is deluded and is living in an outdated version of reality. South Africans understand that the ZAR is worth very little and so no one in the country criticises a South African for leaving to find better economic opportunities elsewhere.


This is the same for anyone, anywhere. If there is an economic opportunity for someone to take, should they lose national privilege because they are looking for a better paycheck somewhere else? What a silly idea. The government doesn't refuse your passport because you work in another country, why should you lose your national jersey for this? If a player leaves to a so-called lesser league and their ability to represent their national jersey at a high level diminishes bc of it, then that should say it all. If Mounga were to return to the ABs and his playmaking is better than D-Mac and BB, then he is the better player for the position. If BB and D-Mac eclipse him, then they are the better players and should get the nod. Why is this so difficult to understand? Surely you want the best players to play in the national team, regardless of who pays their monthly salary? Closing borders is historically a silly economic idea, why should it be any different in national level sports?


The old boys tradition in rugby has created a culture of wonderful sportsmanship, it is why we all (presumably) prefer the game to football. But when tradition gets in the way of common sense and sporting success, perhaps traditions should change. Players have the right to earn money, there is no need to punish them for it. Rugby needs to think globally if it wants to survive.

36 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Can Will Jordan avoid the All Blacks curse of turning 27? Can Will Jordan avoid the All Blacks curse of turning 27?
Search