Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

London Irish opt not to stoke controversy in Ireland with Paddy Jackson

Paddy Jackson poses last week for a portrait ahead of the new London Irish season (Photo by Steve Bardens/Getty Images)

London Irish have steered clear of the potential for controversy by opting not to bring Paddy Jackson with them to Ireland when they open their new season away to Munster next Friday.

ADVERTISEMENT

The out-half – sacked by the IRFU in April 2018 despite being found not guilty at a high profile court case in Belfast – hasn’t played a single match in his home country since he was forced to earn his living outside Ireland. 

Perpignan, the French club Jackson joined last season, excluded him from their squad last December when they travelled to Galway to take on Connacht in a Challenge Cup pool fixture. 

Now his latest employer, London Irish, has decided not to bring the opinion-dividing half-back to Cork for their annual Jack Wakefield Memorial Trophy fixture with Munster. 

Jackson’s signing by the newly promoted Gallagher Premiership club has already stoked controversy as long-time club sponsor Guinness pulled their sponsorship last June and it remains to be seen how the player’s presence will be received on the English league circuit once that tournament gets going in mid-October. 

(Continue reading below…)

Video Spacer

It was alleged that an appearance by Jackson in Cork could have been problematic as more than 100 people had already indicated their intention to protest. 

Jackson, who was publicly backed by his coach Declan Kidney last week, has not played a match in Ireland since the curtain came down on his Ulster career with a late April 2017 PRO12 win over Leinster in Belfast, the same game that was the last appearance of Ruan Pienaar in the Ravenhill club’s colours.  

ADVERTISEMENT

With Jackson kept on ice, Irish are travelling to Munster with a squad of 29 players which has Stephen Myler and Jacob Atkins pencilled in at their options at out-half.  

The friendly is the English club’s only pre-season fixture ahead of their Premiership Cup campaign, which begins September 21 with a trip to Kingsholm to play Gloucester.

London Irish (v Munster, Friday)

1. Harry Elrington/Will Goodrick-Clarke

2. Dave Porecki/Ross McMillan*

3. Lovejoy Chawatama/Patric Cilliers

4. Chunya Munga/Barney Maddison ©

5. Franco van der Merwe ©/Sam Collingridge

ADVERTISEMENT

6. George Nott/Ben Donnell

7. Conor Gilsenan/Blair Cowan

8. Matt Rogerson/Izaiha Moore-Aione

9. Rory Brand/Scott Steele

10. Stephen Myler/Jacob Atkins

11./14. Ollie Hassell-Collins/Ben Loader/Tom Fowlie

12. Terrence Hepetema/Matt Williams

13. Curtis Rona/Brendan Macken

15. Tom Parton/Will Partington

*Ross McMillan has joined London Irish on a short-term contract as World Cup cover.

WATCH: The trailer for the soon-to-be-released RugbyPass documentary on the Tonga national team as they prepare to play at the 2019 World Cup in Japan

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search