Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

How long before Kini Naholo will be playing Super Rugby?

The youngest Naholo played sevens for Taranaki after finishing school last year.

The youngest Naholo brother, Kiniviliame debuted for Taranaki in a first class match against Poverty Bay in a pre-season Shield challenge on the weekend.

ADVERTISEMENT

The impact was terrifying for the opposition, as Naholo junior showed enormous potential in a damaging performance. The 19-year-old winger’s first try was an impressive run through multiple defenders, using footwork and power to discard defenders.

His second effort was an easy left foot step as he glided through the defence on counter-attack.

With such early promise, how soon can we expect this prodigious talent to be lining up against his older brother Waisake in Super Rugby?

Much will depend on his debut Mitre 10 season with Taranaki if they decide to hand him the starting wing position for the full season this year. Having represented the New Zealand schoolboys last year, Naholo will be in firm contention for the under-20’s next season, especially if he has a major impact for the Taranaki Bulls proving his ability at the provincial level.

He spent most of his time at Hastings Boys on the left wing where he racked up 41 tries last season, but due to positional strength moved to the right wing for the New Zealand schoolboys. That will again be a hotly contested spot for the under-20’s that could see Naholo used on the opposite side.

With wingers possessing most of their athleticism at a younger age and declining with time, there is no reason why Naholo can’t complete a meteoric rise to Super Rugby within a year. Rieko Ioane is 21-years-old and completed a Lions series whilst only 20-years-old. Naholo will be 20-years-old next year and following a Junior World Cup campaign could make a debut appearance.

Video Spacer

A boom Mitre 10 campaign could elevate Naholo’s stock to the point where a Super Rugby team is interested in using a squad spot for him for 2019. Taranaki is a Chiefs-aligned union and that would be his first opportunity, with a chance to oust current wingers Sean Wainui, Shaun Stevenson, Solomon Alaimalo and Toni Pulu in the pecking order. That fittingly presents his best chance anyway – the Blues have investments in Caleb Clarke and Ioane, the Crusaders have George Bridge, the Highlanders have just resigned Tevita Nabura and the Hurricanes uncovered Ben Lam this year.

ADVERTISEMENT

If not 2019, then 2020 will be highly likely in a post-World Cup environment.

Older brother Waisake Naholo has re-committed to the end of 2019 one another one-year deal, his second in a row. If he decides to stay post World Cup, there is the very real possibility he could line up opposite his younger brother, or if the Highlanders are interested in grabbing another Naholo they could play on the same team on either side.

In other news:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search