Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

How Europe can make Super Rugby great again

Super Rugby needs to change - but how?

Super Rugby bosses looking for a proven competition model could do worse than follow the successful European Champions Cup, writes James Harrington.

ADVERTISEMENT

On the whole, Southern Hemisphere rugby has prospered very nicely, thank you very much, with a simple policy of seeing how the game is played in the north, ignoring it completely and developing something superior in every way.

Back in the day when tours were real tours, sides from the northern half of the world would find that South African teams were always more powerful; Australia’s more pugnacious; and New Zealand’s just better. At everything. That was the way of the rugby world.

And then came Super Rugby, the club competition to rule them all. Fans from oop north, unused to this diamond-cut version of the game, would tune in and watch in awe at the sheer quality of the devil-may-care rugby unfolding in front of their very eyes.

Today, however, Super Rugby has become a victim of its own success and ambition. It has grown fat and unwieldy, jaded and over-complicated.  

Sanzaar’s plan to cut the number of teams from 18 to 15 isn’t going smoothly, while the on-pitch gulf between the New Zealand franchises and everyone else is sometimes embarrassing.

Today, watching it from afar sometimes feels like being ‘re-educated’, Clockwork Orange-style, by being forced to watch the 2015 World Cup quarter-final between the All Blacks and France on permanent loop. It’s not a contest, which is what rugby is all about.

ADVERTISEMENT

Various options to deal have been put forward to make Super Rugby great again – beyond even Sanzaar’s cull-and-cure.

Waratahs’ CEO Andrew Hore, who knows a thing or two about rugby, has suggested New Zealand should welcome eight NRC teams into the Mitre 10 Cup to help develop Australian players and reinvigorate Australia’s Super Rugby and international teams.

[rugbypass-ad-banner id=”1473723684″]

There’s no doubt the game in Australia is suffering. As standards have on the field have slipped, crowds and TV audiences have plunged. Australians have turned off – and against – rugby.

Others have said the conference system is a bad idea that needs to be replaced by a straightforward league structure. There’s a strong argument for that. It worked before, for a start.

ADVERTISEMENT

Peak Super Rugby occurred when it had 12 teams. It was still pretty damn awesome when it boasted 14 teams. Now? Not so much.

Perhaps there’s a third way. For once, the Southern Hemisphere could do worse than follow in Europe’s footsteps and copy the European Cup. For 20 years it has been a fantastic competition, with little noticeable tinkering required to the basic model.

In much the same way, entry to a future Super Rugby tournament could come via annual qualification through a domestic league system.

Changes would probably be needed domestically. For the sake of argument let’s call these league systems the Mitre 10, NRC (perhaps with the Sunwolves included) and Currie Cup – maybe even the Campeonato Argentino.

It would allow the unions across the currently ailing areas of Super Rugby world to improve their domestic leagues, community and grassroots rugby, without expecting New Zealand to do all the player development work.

Interest in domestic competitions – already pretty hot in New Zealand, reasonably strong in South Africa, not so great in Australia, and in need of investment in Argentina – would rise, courtesy of the prospect of qualification for a Super Rugby competition.

With one round of the French Top 14 remaining, six teams have a fighting chance of taking the solitary automatic French place remaining in next season’s Champions Cup. Forget buying a ticket to matches featuring those clubs this weekend. They have long been sold out.

In England, Premiership attendance could top the two-million mark for the first time, courtesy of marketing to kill for, and in part thanks to the continuing lure of the Champions Cup. One match left, three teams in with a shout of the one remaining available slot.

This foundations-up approach to the pinnacle of European rugby works. It brings in crowds – a combined 90,000 at the two Champions Cup semi-finals, admittedly with fanatical Irish help, but also 25,000 at the two Challenge Cup semis … without fanatical Irish help.

And, frankly, the European Cup is these days a more entertaining spectacle than Super Rugby. Games are closer. Tension is higher. And standards across the board are pretty decent.

Token Italian sides apart, there are no gimme fixtures. Unlike Super Rugby, no one nation’s teams are way ahead of the others.

The Scottish, Irish, English and French teams that contested the quarterfinals were there by right, not some convoluted conference system designed to artificially manipulate interest. There were English, French and Irish teams in the last four, and the final is a shoot-out between the Premiership and the Top 14.

Given the greater distances in Super Rugby, there are logistical issues to overcome, but there’s no deal-breaker reason a similar tournament model can’t work in the Southern Hemisphere.

The New Zealand Rugby Union boasted in its recent annual report that: “The success of our national and Super Rugby teams is entirely reliant on the success of community rugby. This investment in community rugby is growing the pool of future All Blacks.”

A European-style Super Rugby tournament could be the start of something similar, spread across Australia, South Africa and Argentina. Everyone’s a winner. Except for tourists from the north.

Watch every game of the Lions Tour of NZ streaming live on rugbypass.com, home of the best online rugby coverage including news, highlights, previews & reviews, live scores, and more!

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

O
Oh no, not him again? 2 hours ago
England internationals disagree on final play execution vs All Blacks

Okay, so we blew it big time on Saturday. So rather than repeating what most people have all ready said, what do I want to see from Borthwick going forward?


Let's keep Marcus Smith on the pitch if he's fit and playing well. I was really pleased with his goal kicking. It used to be his weakness. I feel sympathy for George Ford who hadn't kicked all match and then had a kick to win the game. You hear pundits and commentators commend kickers who have come off the bench and pulled that off. Its not easy. If Steve B continues to substitute players with no clear reason then he is going to get criticised.


On paper I thought England would beat NZ if they played to their potential and didn't show NZ too much respect. Okay, the off the ball tackles certainly stopped England scoring tries, but I would have liked to see more smashing over gainlines and less kicking for position. Yes, I also know it's the Springbok endorsed world cup double winning formula but the Kiwi defence isn't the Bok defence, is it. If you have the power to put Smith on the front foot then why muzzle him? I guess what I'm saying is back, yourself. Why give the momentum to a team like NZ? Why feed the beast? Don't give the ball to NZ. Well d'uh.


Our scrum is a long term weakness. If you are going to play Itoje then he needs an ogre next door and a decent front row. Where is our third world class lock? Where are are realible front row bench replacements? The England scrum has been flakey for a while now. It blows hot and cold. Our front five bench is not world class.


On the positive side I love our starting backrow right now. I'd like to see them stick together through to the next world cup.


Anyway, there is always another Saturday.

7 Go to comments
C
CO 3 hours ago
Scott Robertson responds to criticism over All Blacks' handling errors

Robertson is more a manager of coaches than a coach so it comes down to intent of outcomes at a high level. I like his intent, I like the fact his Allblacks are really driving the outcomes however as he's pointed out the high error rates are not test level and their control of the game is driving both wins and losses. England didn't have to play a lot of rugby, they made far fewer mistakes and were extremely unlucky not to win.


In fact the English team were very early in their season and should've been comfortably beaten by an Allblacks team that had played multiple tests together.


Razor has himself recognised that to be the best they'll have to sort out the crisis levels of mistakes that have really increased since the first two tests against England.


Early tackles were a classic example of hyper enthusiasm to not give an inch, that passion that Razor has achieved is going to be formidable once the unforced errors are eliminated.


That's his secret, he's already rebuilt the passion and that's the most important aspect, its inevitable that he'll now eradicate the unforced errors. When that happens a fellow tier one nation is going to get thrashed. I don't think it will be until 2025 though.


The Allblacks will lose both tests against Ireland and France if they play high error rates rugby like they did against England.


To get the unforced errors under control he's going to be needing to handover the number eight role to Sititi and reset expectations of what loose forwards do. Establish a clear distinction with a large, swarthy lineout jumper at six that is a feared runner and dominant tackler and a turnover specialist at seven that is abrasive in contact. He'll then need to build depth behind the three starters and ruthlessly select for that group to be peaking in 2027 in hit Australian conditions on firm, dry grounds.


It's going to help him that Savea is shifting to the worst super rugby franchise where he's going to struggle behind a beaten pack every week.


The under performing loose forward trio is the key driver of the high error rates and unacceptable turn overs due to awol link work. Sititi is looking like he's superman compared to his openside and eight.


At this late stage in the season they shouldn't be operating with just the one outstanding loose forward out of four selected for the English test. That's an abject failure but I think Robertson's sacrificing link quality on purpose to build passion amongst the junior Allblacks as they see the reverential treatment the old warhorses are receiving for their long term hard graft.


It's unfortunately losing test matches and making what should be comfortable wins into nail biters but it's early in the world cup cycle so perhaps it's a sacrifice worth making.


However if this was F1 then Sam Cane would be Riccardo and Ardie would be heading into Perez territory so the loose forwards desperately need revitalisation through a rebuild over the next season to complement the formidable tight five.

28 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Joseph-Aukuso Suaalii strikes awe as Wallabies lose star midfielder Suaalii strikes awe as Wallabies lose midfielder
Search