Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Los Pumas name 46-man Rugby World Cup squad and it's not just Jaguares players

Tomas Lavanini (Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

Los Pumas Head Coach Mario Lesdesma has unveiled his 46 strong training squad ahead of the Rugby Championship and the Rugby World Cup in Japan.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Pumas are in the same pool as England, France, Tonga and the USA.

Assistant coaches – Nicolás Fernández Miranda and Martín Gaitán – will be accompanied by Juan Fernández Lobbe, also an assistant coach and Gonzalo Longo as team manager.

He has included both Premiership and Top 14 players, expectedly rowing back on the Los Puma’s Super Rugby based selection policy.

In March Ledesma clarified: “For years, the players could not evolve for Los Pumas if they were not part of the Jaguares. Recently, the rule has relaxed somewhat, in the sense that when the need arises, we summon expatriate players to a specific position. We will always favour the guy of the franchise. But if not, we will call on expatriates.”

Looseheads

1 Tetaz Chaparro, Nahuel – Jaguares
2 Vivas, Mayco – Jaguares
3 Zeiss, Juan Pablo – Jaguares
4 Díaz, Javier – Jaguares
5 García Botta, Santiago

Hookers

6 Creevy, Agustín – Jaguares
7 Montoya , Julián – Jaguares
8 Socino, Santiago – Jaguares

Tightheads

9 Figallo, Juan – Saracens
10 Herrera, Ramiro – Stade Francais
11 Medrano, Santiago – Jaguares
12 Pieretto, Enrique – Jaguares
13 Sordoni, Lucio – Jaguares

ADVERTISEMENT

Secondrows

14 Petti, Guido – Jaguares
15 Lavanini, Tomás – Jaguares
16 Alemanno, Matías – Jaguares
17 Paulos, Lucas – Jaguares

Backrow

18 Matera, Pablo – Jaguares
19 Lezana, Tomás – Jaguares
20 Isa, Facundo – Toulon
21 Ortega Desio, Javier – Jaguares
22 Kremer, Marcos – Jaguares
23 Bruni, Rodrigo – Jaguares
24 Leguizamón, Juan Manuel

Scrumhalves

25 Cubelli, Tomás – Jaguares
26 Bertranou, Gonzalo – Jaguares
27 Landajo, Martín – Jaguares
28 Ezcurra, Felipe – Hindú

ADVERTISEMENT

Flyhavles

29 Sánchez, Nicolás – Stade Francais
30 Urdapilleta, Benjamín – Castres
31 Díaz Bonilla, Joaquín – Jaguares
32 Miotti, Domingo – Tucumán L.t.

Centres

33 González Iglesias, Santiago – Jaguares
34 De La Fuente, Jerónimo – Jaguares
35 Orlando, Matías – Jaguares
36 Moroni, Matías – Jaguares
37 Mensa, Lucas – Pucará
38 Mallía, Juan Cruz – Jaguares

Back three

39 Ezcurra, Bautista – Jaguares
40 Moyano, Ramiro – Jaguares
41 Delguy, Bautista – Jaguares
42 Cancelliere, Sebastián
43 Boffelli, Emiliano – Jaguares
44 Tuculet, Joaquín – Jaguares
45 Montero, Manuel – Pucará
46 Carreras, Santiago – Jaguares

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search