Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

MacDonald hails Blues' 'complete performance' ahead of top Australian opposition

(Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

In the wake of the Blues’ sizeable 71-28 victory over the Rebels, coach Leon MacDonald has praised his side’s performance following two less-than-impressive showings across the ditch and a slow start on Friday night that saw them down 14-0 after just five minutes of play.

ADVERTISEMENT

Capitalising on two lineout errors, Rebels forwards Pone Fa’aumasili and Josh Canham both found themselves on the scoreboard with well-taken tries that left the Blues facing an uphill battle effectively right from the kick-off.

After some mixed performances in recent weeks that saw the Blues notch just two tries in the back 40 minutes of their away fixtures against the Fijian Drua and the Western Force, signs weren’t looking good for the home team at Eden Park – but it didn’t take long for the Blues to spring back into action against the Rebels with Akira Ioane dotting down for his first try of the evening after 7 minutes of play.

Video Spacer

Why Super Rugby Pacific is still not yet where it needs to be.

Video Spacer

Why Super Rugby Pacific is still not yet where it needs to be.

Six minutes later, Ioane was in again – and from that point on, MacDonald’s men were cruising.

“It wasn’t an ideal start,” MacDonald acknowledged after the match. “But these things can happen and they’re good little challenges for us to overcome and I think for Dalton [Paplii] to be the skipper and make sure that we didn’t panic and we stayed composed, I think we bounced back well.

“By and large, the huddle was a nice controlled one – it was about what we needed to do next to get back into the game. And sports happens like this. You’re going to have some adversity because that’s the way it is but I thought we dealt with that really well.”

While the opening five minutes obviously didn’t go the home team’s way, MacDonald felt that the Blues put the closest thing to a complete performance out on the park that he had seen all season – and one which was peppered with plenty of razzle-dazzle.

“The discipline was probably the thing I’m most proud of,” he said. “We’ve obviously had a couple of weeks where we’ve managed to get a lead and then we’ve buttoned off and let the opposition back in or got a bit sloppy with discipline or skill and I thought this was a much more complete performance [on] both sides of the ball.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I know we conceded a couple of tries but a lot of the defensive play in the second half when they had nothing to lose and they chucked a lot at us, we withstood and our penalty count was in the single digits. That was a big step up from where we’ve been as well.

“We knew we had it in us. We were frustrated that we had let ourselves down a little bit [against the Drua and Force]. We just needed to refocus and make sure that each individual brought their best throughout the whole week, the way they trained and the way that they prepared, both physically and mentally. The timing of the pass, the support lines that we were running, the way we moved around the park was a big step up from where we’ve been in the last couple of weeks.”

Related

The Blues finished the match with 11 tries to their name, made 13 linebreaks to the Rebels’ three, beat 35 defenders to the Rebels’ nine and also threw 21 offloads to the Rebels’ four whilst conceding just 10 turnovers throughout the match.

As MacDonald alluded to, they also rarely got too overzealous on attack and knew when to throw men into rucks and when to fan them out along the width of the park – with the forwards regularly churning through metres in the middle of the park and getting involved in both the tight and loose attacks.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think the decision making around the offload [impressed the most] – I didn’t think we were flippant at all, I think [there was] maybe one loose offload in the game really where I think we should have probably taken it,” he said. “In a game that can open up, that’s probably been our Achilles heel in the past, we started getting a little bit over-excited there.

“It’s hard to single out any forward, I thought everybody had their moments. A lot of the interplay stuff came on the back of some pretty heavy carries. I thought James Tucker got some good yards through the middle. I thought Kurt Eklund, early on where their wall was a bit starcher, he was really putting some hard carries in there.

“We earned the right the right way. We were physical in our clean-outs. I thought we fought really hard in that contact area and made it really hard for them to get set on defence, which set up our backs later on.”

Captain Papalii shared similar sentiments with his coach.

“When the flair’s going and we’re dominating it’s because we’re doing the basics well,” he said. “That start we didn’t execute and we were piggy-backing down the field through our discipline.

“It just goes to show we could be one of the best teams, if not the best team in the country or in the world or in this comp when we’re doing the basics well. We’ve just got to keep harping on about that and keep getting the job done.”

Having dispatched of the three lower-ranked Australian-based sides, the Blues are now set to take on the Reds, Brumbies and Waratahs to round out their regular season knowing that a clean run of victories will ensure they end the knockout stages as the top-seeded team – which will give them the all-important home advantage.

“The next little while’s critical, it’s going to dictate where we finish on the table,” MacDonald said.

“We love playing at Eden Park. We’ve played well here over the last few years, we’ve been hard to beat here. I think the Crusaders are the only team that’s beaten us here for a little while. To give us every opportunity of a run home, it makes a big difference. And also pride defending our record here. I think that’s really important.”

“We don’t need to change anything,” added Papalii. “We know the process. Talking to [Luke] Romano, all that experience, and he said these are the times where you don’t back off, you just keep ramping it up, keep pushing that little bit extra, and I think the boys will keep doing that. We got a taste of how good we can be and I think it sort of gives us another drive, we’re just going to keep pushing.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 12 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

147 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

147 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search