Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Magical Fiji strike to relegate tier one side from Under-20s World Cup for first time since 2012

Fiji's players perform the cibi at the World Rugby Under-20 Championship in Argentina (Photo by Rodrigo Valle/Getty Images)

The headlines are focused on the final between Australia and France at the World Rugby Under-20 Championship on Saturday, but there was just as much on the line in the Scotland versus Fiji game, a contest that decided which of the two would be relegated to the World Rugby Trophy next season.

ADVERTISEMENT

Fiji were playing in their first World Rugby Under-20 Championship since they were relegated from the competition in 2014, while Scotland have been an ever-present in the tournament since its formation in 2008. Despite recording eight 9th/10th place finishes at the competition in their 11 previous campaigns, Scotland had never been involved in the relegation play-off until this season.

In that 11-year history, a tier one side has only been relegated twice before. Italy faced the drop in 2009 and 2012, although in 2009 the Italians were among four sides relegated as the competition reduced in size from 16 teams to 12. On both occasions that Italy were relegated, they bounced back immediately, winning the Under-20 Trophy the following year.

In what proved an entertaining affair in Rosario, Fiji saved their best performance for last at the Argentina-hosted tournament as they triumphed 59-34 and consigned Scotland to their first ever relegation.

Scotland kept pace with Fiji early on, as full-back Osea Waqa helped set up tries for Isaac Ratumaitavuki and Veresa Tuqovu, only for Jack Blain and Matt Davidson to strike back for the Six Nations side. Blain, in particular, was a consistent threat for Scotland early on, although Fiji’s strong finish to the half laid the foundation for Scotland’s downfall.

Waqa went over for a score of his own after his work as a creator earlier on. He ran a scything counter-attack through three would-be Scottish tacklers before wings Kaminieli Rasaku and Osea Natoga got in on the action to give Fiji a commanding 38-15 lead at half time.

The second half saw a spirited Scottish comeback, as hooker Ewan Ashman collected a brace, something which remarkably took him to seven tries in the tournament, while Blain grabbed his second of the game also.

ADVERTISEMENT

Thankfully for Fiji, Waqa also went over for his second try of the game, which established a lead on the scoreboard that Scotland couldn’t quite reel in. Anasa Qaranivalu and Ilaisa Droasese then both cruised over late on, adding plenty of gloss to Fiji’s impressive performance.

For Fiji, it’s a time to celebrate as promising talents like Waqa, Natoga, Tiri Shaw, Alivereti Loaloa and Chris Minimbi, who are all eligible for another year of age-grade rugby, will once again get to test themselves in the top-tier tournament next season.

With an on-island academy being funded by World Rugby’s targeted investment, Fiji’s avoiding of relegation is a success story for the scheme and an indicator of what can be done for tier two and smaller nations with the right investment.

Conversely, there will be tough questions to answer in Scotland as the northern hemisphere side will have to spend at least one season in the Under-20 Trophy where they will be competing against the likes of Japan, Hong Kong, Namibia and Uruguay.

ADVERTISEMENT

The only way Scotland’s place in the Championship could be saved would be if they were to host the Championship next season, as the host nation is always guaranteed a spot at the tournament.

WATCH: Part one of The Academy, the six-part RugbyPass documentary series on how Leicester Tigers develop their young players

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes
Search