Malcom Marx is the world's best hooker. Why is he not starting?
Fans and pundits who cling to the idea of South African exceptionalism on a rugby field would argue that the Springboks could beat most teams with one hand tied behind their backs. This is less far fetched than it might seem.
Since the final whistle of the 2019 World Cup the world’s best hooker has been on the pitch for just 50.7% of the time for the Springboks. He’s started six of the 27 matches he’s played. He didn’t start a single game against the British & Irish Lions in 2021 and has played fewer minutes than his understudy in three of the past four seasons.
Let’s put jingoism and blinkered biases aside. Malcom Marx is undeniably world class. We can quibble over the title of world’s best hooker – perhaps you think Ireland’s Dan Sheehan or New Zealand’s Dan Coles deserve that title – but we’d be splitting hairs and arguing over taste. Wherever he fits in your pantheon, Marx’s place at the top table is guaranteed.
Since making his debut in 2016, he’s averaged more tries scored (0.4), more break assists (0.3), more line breaks (0.5) and more turnovers won (1.7) per 80 minutes in the Rugby Championship than any other hooker. He also has the best lineout throw percentage with 88% in the competition.
In that same period he’s been the world’s most prolific hooker when it comes to turnovers won and evades the tackle better than any other hooker with a 17% success rate. He’s in the top three for a range of other statistics including carries per game, carry dominance, gainline success and metres per carry.
He certainly passes the eyeball test as well. From the East Rand region of Gauteng on the edge of Johannesburg, Marx carries himself with a menace that will be instantly recognisable to locals. Hardened in the talent furnace that is King Edward VII School, alma mater of Bryan Habana and Joe van Niekerk, he was seemingly destined to terrorise the tight exchanges around the breakdown at the elite level.
Most coaches would be tempted to use such a potent weapon every chance they got. Especially if that weapon was able to retain much of its sharpness in the relatively gentler Japanese league when not on international duty. After all, Marx has only just turned 29. He’s got plenty more miles left in the tank and plenty more bruises to inflict on opponents.
And yet, Jacques Nienaber has largely kept Marx in reserve. This is a consequence of the Bomb Squad tactic that he inherited from Rassie Erasmus that stacks the bench with heavy hitters and a particularly brutal front row. Some time between the start of the second half and the hour mark, that extra heft is unleashed to either turn the tide or hammer home an advantage.
Marx started just one game at the 2019 World Cup – the 23-13 defeat to New Zealand in the opening group fixture. After that watched from the sideline as Bongi Mbonambi or Schalk Brits took the field in wins over Italy, Canada, Japan, Wales and England. His contributions made a difference, but even then some observers wondered if the Springboks were getting the best out of their star hooker.
It wasn’t always like this. Before the World Cup Marx started 23 of the 33 games he played. That’s just under 70%. In that time he was on the field for 63% of the time. Since the World Cup he’s started six out of 27 matches which is a touch over 22%. No other nation deliberately fields a weakened starting XV as frequently as the Springboks.
Of course, Mbonambi is no grub. He might be South Africa’s most improved player since he debuted three months before Marx. Since the World Cup Mbonambi has more carries per 80 minutes than Jamie George, has more metres per carry than Ken Owens and has a better lineout throw success rate than Codie Taylor.
He lacks Marx’s threat at the breakdown, and only achieves gainline success with half of his carries, but his contributions can’t be discounted. However, comparing a solid 32-year-old professional with a 29-year-old generational talent is neither fair nor constructive. And sticking with a plan that has worked in the past but now needs recalibration is doing neither of them a favour.
Marx simply has to start against Argentina next week and at least one of the games against Wales and New Zealand as they tune-up for a World Cup defence in France. If only to see what happens. If only to ascertain Mbonambi’s impact from the bench. Will South Africa establish early dominance? Will they miss that extra grunt provided by a revved up Marx? These questions need definitive answers and Nienaber is running out time to find them.
While he’s at it, perhaps Nienaber should consider abandoning the Bomb Squad approach entirely. Just for a few games. We all know how devastating it can be when it works but why not tear up the well-worn playbook and roll the dice on something different? Allow the likes of Marx, RG Snyman and Pieter-Steph du Toit the chance to fully empty the tank before bringing on a substitute. This wouldn’t be a major departure from the current plan that already asks its first XV to give it all they’ve got.
Marx has been denied that chance. By diminishing his output to cameos he’s forever leaving the field with a little extra to give. His contributions are imposing, but fleeting. Let him loose for the full 80 minutes if he has it in him.
Of course, this may be the plan after all. Who’s to say if Nienaber hasn’t been playing chess while we’ve been analysing checkers. It could be that Marx and his coaches have been working the long game. Cameos and brief appearances coupled with a prolonged stint in Japan has potentially prolonged his potency. Perhaps his best is yet to come. Isn’t that a frightening thought?
Have you guys ever heard of an anchor leg in a relay race? Look it up. Here's the news: You have your best runner running last.
I am not doubting the transformation goals etc. But irrespective of that it is a legitimate strategy to save Marx for the last quarter showdown. And the better he is the more sense that makes.
Marx is also one of the world's best impact players. He has the power, speed, skills and experience to come on for the last 20m and do whatever is necessary to help nail the win. SA changes gear in the set pieces, on the gain line, the mauls and in the ruck contest when he comes on.
Some coaches don't believe in having their second choice players on the field in the last quarter, when the game is often decided.
@Daniel: With all due respect to you and rugbypass - this article is of incredibly poor standard.
I really like rugby pass for the content and insight but i suggest re-writing this article.
The truth about Marx not starting is unfortunately because of race selection quotas. South African sporting codes are subject to it.
As South Africans its demoralising to read content like yours that completely ignore the truth now in the current time period but will hark about the isolation years for South African sport easily.
Daniel I challenge you to have the guts to write the full truth about race selection qoutas in SA rugby and other codes here.
You will likely get disciplined but at least you would be telling the truth.
Marx is white so no start.... Codie Taylor is the best 💪
Imo, Marx is the ultimate impact player/finisher and the balance between him and Bongi, with the current Bok game plan, works.
The only beef I have is that MM shouldn't be brought on 5 minutes into the 2nd half, but 5 minutes before the of the 1st half; Bongi applies the slow poison in the first 30 to 35 minutes and MM comes on to wreak havoc on opponents who have been pummeled mercilessly.
Marx doesn't start because he's white. The team wouldn't meet their racial quota of black players. Colour > Merit.
A top provincial school team recently got disqualified in South Africa from playing in a cup final because they had too many white players in the team.
Technically,according to World Rugby laws,the Boks should be banned from international rugby.
Are you idiots going to seriously keep pretending you don't know the actual reason, or are you actually that uniformed as rugby writers? SA has racial quota targets to meet, this is well known and not hidden in any way. All other teams can select whoever they want, SA cannot, which makes their success even more impressive considering they don't have the same freedoms afforded to every other side. They have to average 6 STARTING players of colour over a season. In the bok starting 15 for big games those have been: Ox nche, Mbonambi, Kolisi, Lukhanyo Am, Mapimpi and Kolbe. Marx is better than Bongi and Kitshoff is better than Ox, which is why they come off the bench so early, but SA are fortunate in that Mbonambi and Ox are still world class players, hence the teams success. But that is why Marx doesn't start, you muppets. SA politicians love getting involved in sport and the IRB are too cowardly to enforce their own law that says you cannot discriminate based on race.
I've never understood why he's in the bomb squad he is himself a bomb and should start every match Bongi is good Marx is great b
South Africa has certain targets that need to be met in terms of racial equality in the starting team. They do say they don't practice this at Bok level but this is a prime example of the best not starting. Bongi is good but he isn't Marx. Anyway, of course there will be people that disagree but the quota system seems to be in action here. Springboks cannot choose a full strength team if it its all white. If all black, it would be allowed to. So before everyone jumps down my throat, there are legitimate non white leading players (Am is probably no1 or 2 for an outside centre in the world to name just 1), so an all white team may not be the best Springboks can field, I am just letting you know how sports teams are selected in RSA, from primary school boy level (children from 6 years of age to 13), 29 years after democracy, right up to the top. 🤷🏻♂️Don't shoot the messenger.