Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Why Manu Tuilagi's case should act as a warning to Rugby Union

Manu Tuilagi

News emerged earlier this week that Manu Tuilagi and Denny Solomona had been sent home from an England training camp for “team culture issues”. Details are sketchy at best, and whilst initial reports of an altercation seem unfounded, the drunken incident was enough for Eddie Jones to send both to the naughty step to have a long hard think about what they’d done.

ADVERTISEMENT

For Tuilagi, fresh off a much-heralded reinstatement to the England fold, many are suggesting this means the death of a once-promising international career.

Tuilagi burst onto the scene with Leicester Tigers in 2010, following in the footsteps of his brothers with his explosive power and unique combination of strength and speed. He was named in the England squad for the 2011 World Cup and in 2012 played an integral role in England’s historic defeat of the All Blacks. By 2013 he was a Lions tourist and so it was no surprise when, in 2015, Tuilagi signed a reported £400,000-a-year contract, becoming the highest paid player in English rugby.

However, pretty much ever since then, Tuilagi has failed to live up to these lofty expectations. Already nagged by injury problems, Richard Cockerill admitted at the time that it was something of a gamble. With the benefit of hindsight, it’s probably fair to say it’s a gamble that hasn’t paid off.

Tuilagi has spent more time on the shelf than the can of expired beans in my mum’s kitchen. That’s not to mention his numerous disciplinary problems, from punching Chris Ashton in 2011 (understandable), jumping from a ferry in Auckland in the same year and, most seriously, being convicted of assaulting two female police officers in 2015.

The eagle-eyed amongst you will have realised that these incidents actually precede the signing of his hefty contract. That assaulting of two women wasn’t enough to stop Tuilagi becoming the highest paid player in the league tells you two things – firstly, how desperate Leicester were to keep him and secondly, that rugby has a superstar problem.

This article isn’t intended to bash Tuilagi, or anyone else for that matter. But he does serve as a test case, and something of a cautionary tale against following the football route of elevating players to megastar status.

ADVERTISEMENT

The reason Leicester felt compelled to offer Tuilagi such a high salary was because they felt they would get a return on their investment. He is a demonstrably talented player, with a unique ability to create something from nothing. That equals wins, which equals silverware, which equals money.

He is also a famous name and a recognisable face. That equals publicity, which equals supporters, which equals money. It’s not cynical to suggest some serious financial pros and cons were considered when debating whether to let the in-demand star head off to rival clubs. Leicester, however, is not a particularly rich club. Historic, yes, successful, yes, but in comparison to the likes of Saracens, Bath, or any number of French clubs with a wealthy backer, Leicester’s bank balance is extremely modest.

This means that the offer of such a large amount of money to one player will have had serious repercussions elsewhere in the budget.

Whilst initial fears that it would lead to in-fighting in the squad don’t seem to have come true, even my GCSE maths is enough to know that subtracting a large percentage from a total means there’s less to go round for everyone else.

ADVERTISEMENT

Tigers did make a few high-profile signings post-Tuilagi, including JP Pietersen and Matt Toomua, but seemingly did so cautiously, knowing a huge chunk of their playing budget was sat on the physio table. That Toomua largely played in the same position as Tuilagi, and would have been on a decent wage himself, would have been especially irritating to those in charge of the Tigers spreadsheets.

Tigers haven’t seen the on-field success they’d have liked in recent seasons either. Whilst it would be ridiculous to pin all the blame on one player or one investment, having the shadow of Tuilagi lurking over the squad can’t have helped. The promise that he may return at any moment as the saviour of Welford Road would almost certainly have affected day-to-day operations as the club looked for direction, not knowing whether to build their future around him or cut their losses and focus elsewhere.

This is symptomatic of a larger issue, wherein the growing wage demands of players but slower increase in revenue of many clubs has created a need for superstars – if clubs can’t pay everyone the big bucks, they have little choice but to put all their eggs in one basket and hope that player is enough to lift the team to glory. Rugby can’t sustain its growing salaries in its current form, and examples such as the Tuilagi case should serve as a warning against throwing money around with the hope that some of it sticks to a trophy.

Of course, these fears could be unfounded. Maro Itoje is arguably the next superstar of world rugby, and is rumoured to be in line to become the Premiership’s first £1m player when his contract expires.

Thus far, Itoje has only had one notable injury, no major disciplinary problems and seems to generally have his head screwed on properly, especially given that he completed his law degree at the same time as starring for the Lions.

He may well serve to be a shrewd investment, offering excellent value for money for whichever club snares his signature in 2019. But at a time when the global game is looking increasingly financially precarious, we should beware the words of charlatan agents promising magic beans. If all we end up with is beans, then we could have saved ourselves all the bother and just looked in my mum’s kitchen.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
France outwrestle All Blacks in titanic Test for one-point win

Yeah nar I pretty much agree with that sentiment, wasn't just about the lineout though.


Yeah, I think it's the future of SR, even TRC. Graham above just now posting about how good a night it was with a dbl header of ENGvSA and NZvFrance, and now I don't want to kick SA or Argentina out of TRC but it would be great if in this next of the woods 2 more top teams could come in to create more of these sort of nights (for rugby's appeal). Often Arg and SA and both travel here and you get those games but more often doesn't work out right.


Obviously a long way off but USA and Japan are the obvious two. First thing we need to do is get Eddie Jones kicked out of Japan so they can start improving again and then get a couple of US teams in SRP (even if one its just a US based and augmented Jaguares).


It will start off the whole conferences are crap debate again (which I will continue to argue vehemently against), but imagine a 6 team Pacific conference, Tokyo Sunwolves (drafted from Tokyo JRLO teams), Tokyo All Stars (made up of best remaining foreign players and overseas drafts), ALL Nihon (best of local non Tokyo based talent, inc China/Korea etc, with mainland Japan), a could of West Coast american franchises and perhaps a second self PI driven Hawai'i based team, or Jagaures. So I see a short NFL like 3 or 4 month comp as fitting best, maybe not even a full round, NZvAUSvPAC, all games taking place within a 6hr window. Model for NZ will definitely still require a competitive and funded NPC!


On the Crusaders, I liked last years ending with Grace on the bench (ovbiously form dependent but thats how it ended) and Lio-Willie at 8. I could have Blackadder trying to be a 7 but think balance will be used with him at 6 and Kellow as 7. Scott Barrett is an international 6 sized player. It is just NZ style/model that pushes him into the tight, I reckon he'd be a great loose player, and saders have Strange and Cahill as bigger players (plus that change could draw someone like Darry back). Same with Haig now, hes not grown yet but Barrett hight and been playing 6, now that the Highlanders have only chosen two locks he'll be playing lock, and that is going to change his growth trajectory massively, rather than seeing him grow like an International 6.

59 Go to comments
T
Tom 1 hour ago
England player ratings vs South Africa | 2024 Autumn Nations Series

Interesting post. I realise that try was down to Marcus Smith not Slade, this is why I mentioned that England's attack is completely reliant on Smith working miracles. Just wanted to highlight that Slade's little touch was classy and most English players would have cocked it up. Earl has gas, he's very athletic but Underhill is nailed on at 7 in my eyes though. They both need to be on the pitch so we need a tall 6 or 8 to complement them which we have in CCS and potentially Ollie Chessum. We also have young Henry Pollock who may be the 7 by the world cup.


The whole attack needs an overhaul but Richard Wigglesworth our attack coach was a very limited scrum half who excelled at box kicking and had no running game. Spent most of his career with Saracens who mauled, defended and set pieced their way to victory.... Which might have been ok if Felix Jones hadn't quit and been replaced by a guy who coaches Oyonnax who have one of the worst defences in the French 2nd division. I'm not too emotionally invested in England right now because this coaching setup isn't capable of winning anything.


England had no attack when they were winning under Eddie either. They battered teams with huge dominant tackles and won from pressure. The last time England had any creativity in attack was the Stuart Lancaster/Mike Catt era. They played some fantastic attacking rugby but results were mediocre, lots of 2nd place finishes in the 6N although it felt like we were building something special until we got brutally dumped out of our home world cup in the pool stage.

8 Go to comments
J
JW 2 hours ago
England player ratings vs South Africa | 2024 Autumn Nations Series

As has been the way all year, and for all England's play I can remember. I missed a lot of the better years under Eddie though.


Lets have a look at the LQB for the last few games... 41% under 3 sec compared to 56% last week, 47% in the game you felt England best in against NZ, and 56 against Ireland.


That was my impression as well. Dunno if that is a lack of good counterattack ball from the D, forward dominance (Post Contact Meters stats reversed yesterday compared to that fast Ireland game), or some Borthwick scheme, but I think that has been highlighted as Englands best point of difference this year with their attack, more particularly how they target using it in certain areas. So depending on how you look at it, not necessarily the individual players.


You seem to be falling into the same trap as NZs supporters when it comes to Damien McKenzie. That play you highlight Slade in wasn't one of those LQB situations from memory, that was all on the brilliance of Smith. Sure, Slade did his job in that situation, but Smith far exceeded his (though I understand it was a move Sleightholme was calling for). But yeah, it's not always going to be on a platter from your 10 and NZ have been missing that Slade line, in your example, more often than not too. When you go back to Furbank and Feyi-Waboso returns you'll have that threat again. Just need to generate that ball, wait for some of these next Gen forwards to come through etc, the props and injured 6 coming back to the bench. I don't think you can put Earl back to 7, unless he spends the next two years speeding up (which might be good for him because he's getting beat by speed like he's not used to not having his own speed to react anymore).

8 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Who gives a crap?' Animosity towards the Springboks is proof of their dominance 'Who gives a crap?' Animosity towards the Springboks is proof of their dominance
Search