Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Marcus Smith dropped as England name team to host Italy

Marcus Smith (right) with Joe Marchant (Photo by Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)

Steve Borthwick has named an England team to play Italy this Sunday in the Guinness Six Nations that shows three changes – including the dropping of Marcus Smith – from the XV that lost 23-29 to Scotland. There was much criticism of the English following that six-point round one loss at home, especially the new head coach’s persistence in selecting Smith at No10 with skipper Owen Farrell at No12.

ADVERTISEMENT

A debate has raged since last weekend about the ongoing merit of England starting two out-halves alongside each other, with the likes of Clive Woodward, Lawrence Dallaglio, Stuart Barnes and Andy Goode amongst those calling for a change.

Borthwick has now reacted, benching Smith and switching Farrell into the No10 jersey rather than have the pair start a ninth successive Test match as the England 10/12 pairing.

Video Spacer

Finn Russell – Calcutta Cup hero on his words with Owen Farrell | England v Scotland | Offload Ep 63

Video Spacer

Finn Russell – Calcutta Cup hero on his words with Owen Farrell | England v Scotland | Offload Ep 63

It was Eddie Jones who first experimented with the idea, originally naming Smith with Farrell for the November 2021 match at home to the Wallabies. Injuries to Farrell quickly shelved the idea but it was revived across the three-Test series in Australia last July and then continued throughout the four-game Autumn Nations Series.

Jones was dismissed in December, but Borthwick started his reign as England coach by last week naming Smith and Farrell as his 10/12 axis, with Joe Marchant chosen at No13 and Manu Tuilagi axed.

Related

With Smith moving to the bench and Farrell switching to No10, England will go with a different midfield consisting of Henry Slade for the omitted Marchant and Ollie Lawrence taking over the No12 jersey vacated by Farrell. In the pack, the sole change sees Jack Willis take over from Ben Curry.

On the bench, Alex Mitchell is named in place of Ben Youngs, and Henry Arundell gets the nod as the 23rd man ahead of Anthony Watson.  The benched Smith will take the replacements place that was occupied last weekend by the now-promoted Lawrence.

ADVERTISEMENT

Borthwick said: “We are at the start of what is a completely new cycle of England Rugby. The implementation of new systems does take time and the squad is showing themselves to be hungry to deliver the sort of performance that we know they are capable of.

“From the squad, I have selected a team for Sunday’s fixture that I believe is best placed to meet the specific challenges that Italy will bring. It is a selection of players whose form, individual strengths, and combined qualities suit the way we want to play against Italy in what we anticipate will be another hard-fought and entertaining spectacle.”

England had retained a 29-strong squad on Wednesday evening when a cut was made to the initial 36 that had assembled at the start of the round two week. The six players now surplus to requirement following the naming of the match day 23 are Marchant, Tom Dunn, David Ribbans, Tommy Freeman, Fin Smith and Manu Tuilagi.

England (vs Italy, Sunday – 3pm)
15. Freddie Steward
14. Max Malins
13. Henry Slade
12. Ollie Lawrence
11. Ollie Hassell-Collins
10. Owen Farrell (C)
9. Jack van Poortvliet
1. Ellis Genge (VC)
2. Jamie George
3. Kyle Sinckler
4. Maro Itoje
5. Ollie Chessum
6. Lewis Ludlam
7. Jack Willis
8. Alex Dombrandt

ADVERTISEMENT

Replacements:
16. Jack Walker
17. Mako Vunipola
18. Dan Cole
19. Nick Isiekwe
20. Ben Earl
21. Alex Mitchell
22. Marcus Smith
23. Henry Arundell

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search