Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Marcus Smith on that substitution and his England plea

By PA
Marcus Smith of England reacts during the Autumn Nations Series 2025 match between England and New Zealand All Blacks at Allianz Stadium on November 2, 2024 in London, England. (Photo by Craig Mercer/MB Media/Getty Images)

Marcus Smith insists England can take comfort in the career trajectories of Usain Bolt and Dan Carter as they come to terms with another near-miss against New Zealand.

ADVERTISEMENT

George Ford, Smith’s replacement at fly-half, missed last-gasp penalty and drop-goal attempts as the All Blacks left Allianz Stadium on Saturday with a 24-22 victory.

Including their two Tests in July, England have lost three successive matches to New Zealand by a combined total of 10 points, continuing their trend of falling to narrow defeats against top-four opposition.

Video Spacer

Immanuel Feyi-Waboso – the hype is real

Sizzle reel for England and Exeter star, Immanuel Feyi-Waboso.

Video Spacer

Immanuel Feyi-Waboso – the hype is real

Sizzle reel for England and Exeter star, Immanuel Feyi-Waboso.

As they turn attention to Saturday’s appointment with Australia, Smith looks to sprint great Bolt and All Blacks star Carter as examples of how it can take time to reach the pinnacle of a sport.

“It’s not a coincidence that people win towards the end. Dan Carter played his first World Cup final at 33, sometimes it’s life,” Smith said.

Kicks

33
Total Kicks
30
1:3.2
Kick To Pass Ratio
1:7

“Usain Bolt, in his first Olympics (2004), didn’t get out of the group stages. Now everyone admires him as a legend.

“International rugby is very different to the Premiership and the experiences we’re experiencing now are very painful, but we’ll be better for them.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Keep the faith. We’ve fallen again on the wrong side of the result, but we’ll learn from it 100 per cent.

“These experiences will tighten us as a group and it will be worth it in the long run. We will be better for it.”

Smith and Ford were at the centre of the most contentious moment of the afternoon in the 62nd minute when a fly-half who was hitting all the right notes was replaced by one who had not played in over a month because of a quad injury.

Ford has been and will continue to be a vital presence for England, but his missed tackle for Mark Tele’a’s 75th-minute try, as well as a wayward drop-goal and penalty that struck the right post, were evidence of a player in need of more game time before being thrust into such a decisive stage of a Test.

ADVERTISEMENT
George Ford
A disconsulate George Ford – PA

Smith has no issue with the substitution, stating that it was the “coaches’ decision and I’m right behind whatever decision they make”.

He also gives Ford his full support, not least because the Sale veteran was hardly given the ideal platform from which to launch his drop-goal.

“Sometimes that’s the life of a kicker, we’ve all experienced that. It’s part and parcel of the job,” Smith said.

“I’ve learned so much off George. He’s an unbelievable kicker, both off the tee and out of hand. It was one of those days.

“It’s nothing to do with him why we didn’t win the game. It’s a team effort. Every kicker in the world has experienced that.

“As kickers we always practise the drop-goal, but it’s very different when you’re out there in front of 80,000 people and the All Blacks shouting ‘Drop-goal! Drop-goal!’.

“It’s an extremely tough kick. Fordy is a master of that drop-goal kick. We go through that scenario week-in, week-out. We practise it as kickers every single day but sometimes it doesn’t go for you. We’re all human and people miss.”

 

Related

Watch the exclusive reveal-all episode of Walk the Talk with Ardie Savea as he chats to Jim Hamilton about the RWC 2023 experience, life in Japan, playing for the All Blacks and what the future holds. Watch now for free on RugbyPass TV

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

15 Comments
J
Johnny 45 days ago

Watching the all blacks play is so so so boring!!! KICK KICK KICK thats all they do

G
GW 47 days ago

But was it a bad substitution? At that stage, regardless of what Marcus Smith had been doing, England had scored one try instigated by Smith intercepting a pass and kicked penalties. When George Ford came on, the comment was that here's the guy who will close out the game and he was doing a reasonable job with the game plan. If his penalty kick went a couple of inches further to the left, you'd be saying that he's a hero, such are the fine margins.


I know that Stuart Barnes said that Smith would've landed the drop goal, but that's ignoring the fact that he'd missed 2 or 3 attempts at dropped goals in the first half when there wasn't the same pressure.


Saying that he'd missed Mark Tele’a when he scored the winning try is putting the blame on an easy scape goat when there were a number of tacklers who failed to stop him scoring.

F
Flankly 47 days ago

We’ve fallen again on the wrong side of the result

Why the passive voice? How about "we need to stop screwing up"?


In a game of 3 tries to 1, NZ gave up enough penalties for England to still be in the race with minutes to go. Repeatedly failing to close it out is not about bad luck or external circumstances. It's about not executing the basics under pressure, and that's a problem.

R
Red and White Dynamight 47 days ago

Attempted 2 x DG's, on penalty advantage. Missed both of them. Dumb rugby, when your best player reverts to an English mindset of safety first then horizons will always be limited.

M
Mark 47 days ago

Borthwicks decision to sub smith for ford was patently the wrong decision, moreover even having ford on the bench in the 1st place was an odd decision, given that he had been injured in the run up to these tests.

Lozowski would have been a more rational pick.

The continued narrative of jam tomorrow from this team Is beginning to sound hollow.

B
Budhachief 48 days ago

I get what Marcus is saying. But on the other hand New Zealand played poorly and still won. They have a very young team,are also going to get better ,are learning their lessons,will be better in the future like Usain bolt blah blah. They're also winning the majority of their games right now.


England have lost a lot of tests under Borthwick and only got to a semi-final because of a lopsided draw.


This whole narrative of England are going to be great just wait and see is nonsense. Their attack was awful, rush defense kind of worked but still leaked tries. Where's the great? Maybe they need to copy what Ireland and France are doing because what their doing isn't working.

J
JWH 48 days ago

ABs played 'poorly'. Alright buddy.

O
OJohn 48 days ago

Borthwick you boofhead

A
AA 48 days ago

I have a great idea.

With Borthwick making utterly stupid substitute decisions , again, how about subbing HIM off after 53 minutes, just when he is about to make the ridiculous choice to bugger the team up .

We could have ,say, Clive ,Rob Baxter , or even Steve Hanson , taking the decision to ,or not ,to sub anyone. In fact, my granny would make a better decision .

Sounds mad ,yes, but so was Borethwicks crazy ,mindless choice .

Will he even think he was wrong .

Dont hold your breath .

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search