Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Marcus Smith eyes allegiance switch when 'dream' England career ends

Marcus Smith of England celebrates victory at full-time following the Rugby World Cup France 2023 Bronze Final match between Argentina and England at Stade de France on October 27, 2023 in Paris, France. (Photo by Franco Arland/Getty Images)

England and Harlequins fly-half Marcus Smith has expressed a desire to one day “be involved in Philippine rugby” when his current Test career comes to an end.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 24-year-old was born in the Philippines to a Filipino mother and a British father, and spent the first eight years of his life there. Under current World Rugby eligibility rules, the fly-half would be able to represent the country of his heritage after a three-year stand down period.

Speaking on an Ask Me Anything session with England recently, Smith was asked whether he would want to represent the Philippines, who his brother Luc plays for, when his England career comes to an end. Though that still seems a long way off , Smith said how he would love to play with his younger brothers should his body allow. He did, however, stress that his focus is solely with England currently, not that anyone should doubt that.

Video Spacer

Stephen Larkham on his name being mentioned for the Wallaby job

Video Spacer

Stephen Larkham on his name being mentioned for the Wallaby job

“One day I’d love to help and be involved in Philippine rugby, my brother currently plays for the Philippines,” the 30-cap England international said.

“Obviously my heart and my mind are fully with England at the minute, it’s a dream of mine to be wearing this kit right now. One day that might be different, or when I retire from here, if I get that opportunity, if my body still holds up, it would be lovely to play with both of my younger brothers.”

Such is Smith’s commitment to England that he even underwent a positional switch midway through the World Cup, starting at fullback against Chile for the first time in his career. Two tries in a 71-0 win against the South Americans earned the Harlequin the No15 shirt for the quarter-final victory over Fiji, although a concussion in that match ruled him out of the semi-final against eventual world champions South Africa. He did take hold of the shirt again though in the bronze final win over Argentina.

This positional switch has even rubbed off on Harlequins, who shifted their playmaker back to fullback for the final quarter in a win over Leicester Tigers at Welford Road.

ADVERTISEMENT

He was also asked how he found the switch into the No15 jersey in the AMA, and whether he thinks it is permanent.

“I’m finding the switch to No15 kind of interesting,” he said. “Obviously, I love playing for England so whenever I get the opportunity to take the field I’m very grateful and honoured to do so. My favourite position is to play fly-half, however, I’ll do anything that’s best for the team.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

4 Comments
S
Sumkunn Tsadmiova 400 days ago

Blimey - he got smashed up playing 15 for England. Playing 15 for the Philippines against a proper team might really sting…..

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search