Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Mark McCall on Saracens' first game 'at this level for 12 months'

By PA
(Photo by Alex Davidson/Getty Images)

Saracens approach their return to the Gallagher Premiership with cautious optimism despite a tough opening assignment against Bristol at Ashton Gate on Friday night.

ADVERTISEMENT

The five-time English champions are back in the top flight after a year spent in Championship exile as punishment for repeated salary cap breaches and are regarded as narrow favourites by bookmakers to reclaim the title they last held in 2019.

Director of rugby Mark McCall knows it might take time to reacclimatise to the Premiership but expects Saracens to be a force at the business end of the season.

Video Spacer

Pre-Season & Lions debrief with Hamish Watson, Ryan Wilson & Max Lahiff | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 1

Video Spacer

Pre-Season & Lions debrief with Hamish Watson, Ryan Wilson & Max Lahiff | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 1

“The truth is we haven’t played a game at this level for 12 months and Bristol will be our first competitive game at this level for 12 months,” McCall said.

“All the teams look stronger than ever before. We’re realistic about where we’re at, but also confident.

“This is a very long season – 24 matches – and we’re confident that we’ll get stronger the longer the season goes on.”

Saracens are missing their British and Irish Lions as they complete their mandatory 10-week stand-down period following the tour to South Africa, but a number of returning loan players are in the starting XV.

ADVERTISEMENT

Nick Isiekwe, Ben Earl, Alex Lozowski and Nick Tompkins face Bristol after spending the season in the Championship at other clubs, while Billy Vunipola slots in at number eight and Jackson Wray is named captain.

“Post Lions tour, clubs will start without the Lions players at the beginning of the season, which is an unusual thing,” McCall said.

“I think some clubs are used to dealing without international players at various points of the season, but to start without them is a new challenge.

“So how teams deal with international absences given the length of the season is going to be interesting.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Bristol, who start Charles Piutau at full-back, finished top of the regular season in 2020-21 only to fall to an inspired Harlequins in the semi-finals.

“Bristol have been getting better year on year. They’re well-organised and well-coached with lots of incredibly dangerous players,” McCall said.

“If you look at the stats form last year, they were top of everything when it came to the attacking side of the game. Most metres gained, most offloads. They are a team of great danger and it’s a great test for our younger players.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search