Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

McCall refuses to comment on Bulls fans’ treatment of Owen Farrell

By PA
Saracens' Owen Farrell (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Saracens’ director of rugby Mark McCall refused to comment on Bulls fans booing visiting captain Owen Farrell when he was kicking at goal in his side’s Champions Cup defeat.

ADVERTISEMENT

Farrell has been frequently booed by opposition fans in recent weeks, especially during the Rugby World Cup with England, and announced a break from international rugby for his mental well-being which will rule him out of the Six Nations.

This was his first game since that announcement and the South African fans booed Farrell after a missed drop goal and when lining up a conversion towards the end of the game.

Video Spacer

Bulls Director of Rugby Jake White previews his team’s Round One Champions Cup encounter with Saracens

Video Spacer

Bulls Director of Rugby Jake White previews his team’s Round One Champions Cup encounter with Saracens

But McCall said after the 27-16 loss: “I have nothing to say about that.”

Saracens denied the home favourites a bonus point in what could be crucial in the group, despite playing more than half the game with 14 men.

Billy Vunipola was sent off for contact to the head when clearing out a ruck, while full-back Alex Goode and second row Maro Itoje both saw yellow, meaning Saracens were unable to grab a losing bonus point themselves.

Saracens will be looking to bounce back when they entertain Connacht next week after the Irish side were well beaten by table toppers Bordeaux.

McCall admitted his side had been up against it at altitude in Pretoria, with the red and yellow cards costing them.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think the discipline comes from pressure,” he said. “We were under a lot of pressure, we were second best physically in the first half, our breakdown and our defensive collisions were nowhere near where they needed to be.

“The scoreline was 20-6 at half-time and I think that reflected the half, but the team showed some grit in the second half to fight back when we were down to 14 men.

“It is a wonderful place to play, an iconic place to play, and we are pleased to have come here but we would have liked to have played a lot better than we did tonight.

“We’ve got a really important game next weekend, this competition is unforgiving – you’ve only got four games and we’ve lost the first one. We’ve got zero points and next week is really important.

ADVERTISEMENT

“When you are losing collisions and under pressure then sometimes that lack of discipline happens.

“I thought Alex Goode was unlucky to be honest, I didn’t agree with that decision, Billy was trying to be urgent and clear out from a line-out and got it wrong. These things happen sometimes.

“I’m pleased we fought back hard in the second half but disappointed with the first half.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
A
Alexander 378 days ago

So much for the ‘global rugby community’ trope.

I'm honestly shocked at the insensitivity of some fans.

D
Diarmid 378 days ago

This guy is going to become one of the greats. Someone needs to point out that when his name came up on the screen and half the stadium booed, they were French. There is no greater compliment than to be booed by the French. Now some SA supporters boo him? Wow… the guy is in total control. Good luck Faz, look at it for what it is, it is jealousy and fear. Chapeau for your resilience, nobody deserves this, you have exposed it and it makes a man of you. Go play in France, Clermont would be a good place.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

146 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search