Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Maro Itoje on England contracts, playing minutes and Martin Johnson

By PA
Maro Itoje at a cryotherapy session in England camp on Monday (Photo by Dan Mullan/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

Maro Itoje doesn’t believe the England decision to award a limited number of enhanced contracts will cause division within Steve Borthwick’s squad. Seventeen players – including Itoje – have been given fixed agreements that will earn them £160,000 per year as part of a new arrangement between the Rugby Football Union and Gallagher Premiership clubs.

ADVERTISEMENT

It allows head coach Borthwick to have the final say on all sports science and medical matters related to those players. Those not on enhanced elite player squad contracts will receive a match fee of £23,000 which hinges on their selection, creating a two-tier system within Borthwick’s squad.

Ben Spencer, Will Stuart and Chandler Cunningham-South are three starters in Saturday’s autumn opener against New Zealand at Allianz Stadium not in possession of a contract, and there are seven players in the same position on the bench following last Friday’s contracts announcement.

Video Spacer

England coach Steve Borthwick on the importance of winning close matches

Steve Borthwick on what he learned from the narrow defeats to New Zealand in the summer.

Video Spacer

England coach Steve Borthwick on the importance of winning close matches

Steve Borthwick on what he learned from the narrow defeats to New Zealand in the summer.

Itoje, however, insisted that England’s core group know their agreements will not be renewed if they under-perform, while the availability of up to eight more contracts provide an incentive for others to deliver on the pitch.

“Steve has set the tone. He said whether you have one of these or not, his job is to pick the best 23 or 15 to represent England and to do the job on Saturday,” explained the Saracens captain. “The aspiration will be to get a contract, but these things are changing.

Team Form

Last 5 Games

1
Wins
4
1
Streak
1
19
Tries Scored
20
22
Points Difference
74
3/5
First Try
3/5
4/5
First Points
0/5
3/5
Race To 10 Points
4/5

“Just because you have a set of players for one season doesn’t mean that they are going to be there for the next season and the season beyond. These things are fluid. Steve has made everyone aware that if you are an enhanced player and not performing then you won’t play and you won’t have one for very long. All of us have to make sure there is no divide, but I don’t foresee that being a real bone of contention.”

Itoje in 2023/24 exceeded his 2,400-minute limit for game-time in a season, including a spell playing through a shoulder injury, and he is keen to avoid a similar scenario unfolding again. “I actually feel that I was in a better position physically come the end of the season than I was earlier on.

ADVERTISEMENT

“That being said, I don’t think it’s necessarily wise to be playing that amount of games every year. It is a bit of a difficult one and it does require management. No-one wants to miss any England games. You don’t want to miss big games for your club either, so it does require some working through.”

Itoje will on Saturday surpass the total of 84 caps held by Rugby World Cup-winning captain Martin Johnson, who was also a world-class second row. “The big thing is not just about racking up caps, racking up appearances for England. What Martin Johnson did was win.

“He won Six Nations, big games against southern-hemisphere teams. While I’ve also done that in my career, there’s more to come. Him and some of the other guys in yesteryear set the standard in terms of winning. I don’t want to just get to a high number of caps and for it to look good on my rugby CV. I want to be part of winning England teams.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

3 Comments
B
Bull Shark 52 days ago

I’d have waited until at least they started winning again before paying them on these contracts.

E
Ed the Duck 52 days ago

Yeah, that might have been the sensible path. England don’t really operate that way!


It’s already causing friction if Marler’s antics are anything to go by…

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search