Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Match Highlights - Scotland vs South Africa

Handre Pollard of South Africa during the Castle Lager Outgoing Tour match between Scotland and South Africa at BT Murrayfield on November 17, 2018 in Edinburgh, Scotland. (Photo by Steve Haag/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

The Springboks have come away with a hard-fought 26-20 win over Scotland at Murrayfield on the back of a man-of-the-match performance by flyhalf Handre Pollard.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 24-year-old had a personal haul of 18 points, scoring one try, two conversions and three penalty goals. South Africa’s captain Siya Kolisi praised Pollard’s game, saying it is getting better and better.

“Each game he is getting better, he is one of the leaders in the team, he helps me with a lot of things and we are really proud of him.”

“Today was very tough, all credit to Scotland. You can see with their record, they’ve only lost one out of 10 games. We knew how big a challenge it was.

“We focused really hard and worked on all the things that didn’t go right last week. We made a couple of plans and we stuck to them and I think we managed the period when Willie le Roux was in the sin-bin quite well.

The loss ends Scotland’s undefeated streak at home at 2018.

“It’s quite frustrating. We couldn’t really generate the speed of ball in the second half, but you have to credit South Africa and the way they defended,” captain Greig Laidlaw said post-match.

They couldn’t capitalise on multiple opportunities inside the five, turning down shots at goal to try a lineout maul which the Springboks dismantled. Laidlaw admitted that in the end, that may have cost them.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Potentially, yes, but you have got to be brave to win Test matches. We had enough opportunities to put points on the board off the back of that. We just needed to execute.

“They went and scored again anyway so we’d have probably needed to score again ourselves.

“We are disappointed, but we need to look at ourselves and make sure we generate quick ball.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Kubota Spears vs Saitama Wild Knights | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

The gruelling reality behind one of the fastest sports in the world | The Report

Boks Office | Episode 40 | The Steven Kitshoff Special

Perry Baker in the house | HSBC Life on Tour | Los Angeles

O2 Inside Line: All In | Episode 6 | Le Crunch

The Unexpected Journey to USA 7s Glory | Aaron Cummings | Sevens Wonders

USA vs Japan | Full Match Replay

Yokohama Canon Eagles vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Confidence knocks and finding your people | Flo Williams | Rugby Rising Locker Room

Tackling reasons for drop-out in sport | Zainab Alema | Rugby Rising Locker Room

Jet Lag: The biggest challenge facing international sports? | The Report

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
BigGabe 8 minutes ago
'Love him or hate him, Henry Pollock has got the rugby world talking.'

@PR I have been trying to respond to you, but my comments keep on being automatically deleted. No idea why. So I am starting a new comment thread, hopefully this works.


Well, I would disagree with your take that you don’t take the piss out of the opposition. Sledging is very much a part of the game - “four more years”/"just a shit richie mccaw”/any swan dive celebration/wit kant commentary/English yelling when they win minor penalties/etc etc. Cricket has much the same when a wicket keeper chats shit in a batsman’s ears, but no one complains about it. Just because we can’t hear what goes on a ruck or maul, or see what goes on, doesn’t mean it doesn’t go on. Sport is emotional and so is taking the piss. Let’s not pretend that rugby has a history of behaving like absolute gentleman before the final whistle goes off.


The spirit of rugby…now this is an interesting one. What does that mean? 2-3 years ago, the 6-2/7-1 split was against the spirit of rugby, but now it is used by club and country. Does this mean the spirit of rugby can change? In 1974, the Lions had an infamous Call 99. Today, teams are still getting into fights. Other sports don’t do this. Is this the spirit of rugby? I think this phrase is one of those useful ones that means everything and nothing and can be used by both sides of the fence, as well as the fence itself, to justify what they want to see. But perhaps we should not be looking at Pollock, but at ourselves. Are we (the rugby public) all not giving a self-described wind up merchant exactly what he wants? Are we not the problem here? I think this conservative group of sports fans needs to realise that just bc they have viewed rugby a certain way for a long time, does not mean that it necessarily needs to be viewed that way for ever and ever amen. That’s gatekeeping and the generations to come don’t like or respect it, not to mention valuable markets that have different values. As rugby culture breaks into new markets, it needs to constantly adjust.


A far more constructive way to resolve this issue, I would argue, is to regulate behaviour. Football players get carded for removing their shirts, why not introduce a similar mechanism? Of course, there would be an adjustment period and probably more polemics, but regulation, law tinkering, and adjustment, is what makes rugby rugby. (Is this the spirit of rugby?) Or, and I would personally prefer this option, we let the kid play. He’s not hurting anyone other than people who want to be hurt.

4 Go to comments
N
Nickers 38 minutes ago
USA team in Super Rugby Pacific is not the answer right now, but this is

The question for any expansion is - what is the point?


On one hand talking about expanding for commercial reasons, but then saying younger squad members would play giving big names a rest making it more for development purposes?


The problem with SRP is it serves two masters - fans who want a good competition to watch, but also the national teams in developing players so they can go on to become international players.


The case for maximising young player development:


A major problem NZ and Australia have is at U20s. AR and NZR would be best served by investing in proper U20 super rugby competition that runs in conjunction with Super Rugby, rather than the one-off carnival style thing that happens at the moment. 20 year olds coming out of France and England in particular, but also France are noticeably more developed than the equivalent players from NZ, Australia and even SA.


NZ and Australia probably both have one too many teams in SR. If you’re taking a long term view they are best served by cutting teams from the comp now and improving the quality even more. Although MP have been good this year there is also an argument for cutting them too, and reducing to 8 teams that all play each other home and away in a round robin. It would be a ridiculously strong competition with a lot of depth if all the best players are redistributed.


This in conjunction with a full U20s competition (possibly playing just one round rather than 2) would make NZ and Australia international teams much stronger with a lot more depth.


But that solution would make less money and cost more.


NPC would need to be fully amateur or semi-pro at best in this model. If you cross reference the losses NZR posted today with the costs they have previously published about operating the NPC, you can attribute a huge amount, if not all of the losses, to the NPC. At the moment this is putting way too much money into a failing high performance competition at the expense of development.

12 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ ‘Rising force’ Proctor gives All Blacks Ioane dilemma ‘Rising force’ Proctor gives All Blacks Ioane dilemma
Search